Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T05:53:07.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The So-called Tissue Phase in Nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Holger Madsen
Holger Madsen
Affiliation:
Jaglfondens Vildtbiologiske Undersogelser, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen, O. Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Big variations have been reported in the extent of occurrence of the so-called “histotropic or tissue phase” (“dormant larvae”) especially in intestinal nematodes. In several species these variations were found by some authors, not by others, and also not always by the same author. From this fact, and from the well known retardation of growth of larvae during their stay in the tissue, it was concluded that it does not represent a phase in the sense of a behavioural pattern innate to the parasite, but rather a phenomenon dependent upon the degree of resistance in the host.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 36 , Issue 1-2 , March 1962 , pp. 143 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, J. E., 1923.—“On the habitat of Ascaridia perspiciltum.” J. Parasit., 10, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackert, J. E., 1931.—“The morphology and life history of the fowl nematode, Ascaridia lineala (Schneider).” Parasitology, 23, 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. D., 1933.—“Some observations on the development of the caecal worm, Heterakis gallinae (Gmelin, 1790) Freeborn, 1923, in the domestic fowl.” Sci. Agric., 13, 356–363.Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1933.—“On the life history of Heterakis gallinae.” J. Helminth., 11, 67–86.Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1934.—“Some observations on the response of chickens to infestation with Heterakis gallinae.” J. Helminth., 12, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, H. P., 1928—“Studies on the life-cycle of Heterakis papillosa (Bloch).” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 47, 379–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsmore, J. D., 1960.—“Retarded development of Ostertagia species in sheep.” Nature, 186, 986–987.Google Scholar
Edgar, S. A., Davis, D. C. and Frazier, J. A., 1957.—“The efficacy of some piperazine compounds in the elimination of helminths from experimentally and naturally-infected poultry.” Poult. Sci., 36, 495–510.Google Scholar
Gidson, T. E., 1953.—“The effect of repeated anthelmintic treatment with phenothiazine on the faecal egg counts of housed horses, with some observations on the life-cycle of Trichonema spp. in the horse.” J. Helminth., 27, 29–40.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. Mcl., 1949.—“Phenothiazine and oesophagostomiasis.” Vet. Rec., 61, 509–512.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. Mcl., 1957.—“Helminthic diseases.” Advanc. vet. Sci., 3, 287–351.Google Scholar
Graybill, H. W., 1921.—“Data on the development of Heterakis papillosa in the fowl.” J. exp. Med., 34, 259–270.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. F., Oonyawongse, H. and Ackert, J. E., 1953.—“Rate of development, viability, vigour and virulence of Ascaridia galli ova cultured respectively in air and in water.” Amer. Midi. Nat., 49, 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. F., Persaud, B. R. B. and Ackert, J. E., 1954.—“Effects of certain anthelmintics and an antibiotic on lumen and tissue phase larvae of Ascaridia galli (Schrank).” Poult. Sci., 33, 140–146.Google Scholar
Horton-Smith, C. and Long, P. L., 1956.—“The anthelmintic effect of three piperazine derivatives on Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788)”. Poult. Sci., 35 606–614.Google Scholar
Hwang, J. C. and Wehr, E. E., 1958.—“Observations on early development of Ascaridia columbae in the pigeon.” J. Parasit., 44, (Suppl.) 26–27.Google Scholar
Itagaki, S., 1928.—“On the life history of the chicken nematode, Ascaridia perspicillum.” Rep. Proc. Third World's Poultry Congr., (Ottawa, Canada, July 27-Aug. 4) 339–344.Google Scholar
Itagaki, S., 1930.—“The nature of the parasitic nodules in the caecal wall of fowls and the development of Heterakis vesicularis.” Fourth World's Poultry Congr. Conf. Papers. Section C (Diseases and their control) 77, 481–483.Google Scholar
Kotlán, A., 1948.—“Studies on the life history and pathological significance of Oesophagostomum spp. of the domestic pig.” Ada vet. Hung., 1, 14–30.Google Scholar
Kotlán, A., 1949.—“On the histotropic phase of the parasitic larvae of Hyostrongylus rubidus.” Ada vet. Hung., 1, 7.Google Scholar
Kotlán, A., 1954.—“Bericht über die Ergebnisse der parasitologischen Forschungsarbeit in Ungarn in den Jahren 1945–1951.” Ada microbiol. hung., 1, 289–295.Google ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E., 1958a.—“Growth and development of Heterakis gallinae in turkeys and chickens infected with Histomonas meleagridis.” J. Parasitol., 44, 297–301.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E., 1958b.—“Studies on “self-cure” and acquired resistance to Heterakis infections in chickens and turkeys.” J. Parasitol., 44, (Suppl.) 27.Google Scholar
Madsen, H., 1952.—“A study on the nematodes of Danish gallinaceous game birds.” Dan. Rev. Game Biol., 2, 1–126.Google Scholar
Madsen, H., 1962.—“On the interaction between Heterakis gallinarum, Ascaridia galli, “blackhead” and the chicken.” J. Helminth., 36, 107–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, W. B., Thomas, B. A. C. and Urquart, G. M., 1957.—“Chronic diarrhoea in housed cattle due to atypical gastritis.” Vet. Rec., 69, 736–739.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., 1955.—“Studies on host resistance to Diclyocaulus infection. I. The phenomenon of inhibited development.” J. comp. Path., 65, 149–168.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., 1958.—“Host resistance to intestinal worms.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 52, 303.Google Scholar
Moran, J. F. jr and Mizelle, J. D., 1956.—“Notes on the habitat and tissuephase of Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788).” J. Parasit. 42, (Suppl.) 18.Google Scholar
Moran, J. F. jr, 1957.—“Studies on Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788).” Amer. Midl. Nat., 58, 170–181.Google Scholar
Riley, W. A. and James, L. G., 1921.—“Studies on the chicken nematode, Helerakis papillosa (Bloch).” J. Amer. vet. vied. Ass., 22, 208–217.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1937a.—“Studies on the biology and control of the large round worm of fowls. Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788) Freeborn, 1923.” Queensland Agr. J., 46, 328–350, 408–470, 729–746 (1936) 47, 8–15.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1937b.—“Studies on the life history and economic importance of Heterakis gallinae, (Gmelin, 1790) Freeborn, 1923, the caecum worm of fowls.” Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci., 15, 429–439.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1957.—“Reactions of calves to infestation with the stomach worm, Haemonchus placei (Place, 1893) Ransom, 1911.” Aust.J. agric. Res., 8, 740–767.Google Scholar
Sadun, E. H., 1948.—“Resistance induced in chickens by infections with the nematode, Ascaridia galli.” Amer. J. Hyg., 47, 282–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Sadun, E. H., 1950.—“Studies on the pathogenecity in chickens of single infections of variable size with the nematode, Ascaridia galli.” Poult. Sci., 29, 712–722.Google Scholar
Scott, J. A., 1928.—“An experimental study of the development of Ancylostoma caninum in normal and abnormal hosts.” Amer. J. Hyg., 8, 168–204.Google Scholar
Sommerville, R. J., 1954.—“The histotropic phase of the nematode parasite, Ostertagia circumcincta.” Aust. J. agric. Res., 5, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, R. J., 1960.—“The growth of Cooperia curticei (Giles, 1892), a nematode parasite of sheep.” Parasitology, 50, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E. J. L., 1958.—“Immunity; to helminths.” Vet. Revs. Annots., 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. B., 1958.—“Resistance of cattle to infection with Cooperia punctata.” Proc. helm. Soc. Wash., 25, 131–132.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. and Michel, J. F., 1953.—“The parasitological and pathological significance of arrested development in nematodes.” J. Helminth., 27, 199–205.Google Scholar
Threlkeld, W. L., 1958.—“The histotropic phase and other biological aspects of Ostertagia ostertagi.” J. Parasit., 44, 342–343.Google Scholar
Todd, A. C. and Crowdus, D. H., 1952.—“On the life history of Ascaridia galli.” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 71, 282–287.Google Scholar
Tugwell, H. L. and Ackert, J. E., 1952.—“On the tissue phase of the lifecycle of the fowl nematode, Ascaridia galli (Schrank)”. J. Parasit., 38, 277–288.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E., 1934.—“Studies on histomoniasis or ‘blackhead’ infections in the chicken and the turkey.” Proc. Amer. A cad. Arts. Sci., 69, 189–264.Google Scholar
Uribe, C., 1922.—“Observations on the development of Heterakis papillosa Bloch in the chicken.” J. Parasit., 8, 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegors, H. H., 1958.—“Observations on inhibited development of cattle nematodes.” Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash., 25, 86–90.Google Scholar
Wehr, E. E. and Hwang, J. C., 1959.—“Further observations on the life history and development of Ascaridia columbae (Gmelin, 1790) Travassos, 1913 in the pigeon.” J. Parasit., 45, (Suppl.) 43.Google Scholar
Worley, D. E., Hansen, M. F. and Persaud, B. H. B., 1957 “Action of piperazine compounds on lumen and tissue phase larvae of Ascaridia galli (Schrank), a roundworm of chickens.” Poult. Sci., 36, 864–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar