Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T06:46:32.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Prepatent Period of Some Horse Nematodes Determined by Experimental Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

M. C. Round
M. C. Round
Affiliation:
Equine Research Station, Animal Health Trust, New market
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experimental infections with strongyles were carried out using ponies reared worm-free. Infection with Strongylus vulgaris was produced by artificially administering larvae to housed ponies. Infection with small strongyles was produced both by this method and also by exposing hitherto worm free ponies to heavily infested pasture. The shortest prepatent periods found were: S. vulgaris, 149–156 days; Triodontophorus spp. and Poteriostomum spp., 63–70 days and trichonemid species 35–42 days.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 43 , Issue 1-2 , March 1969 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drudge, J. H., Lyons, E. T., Szanto, J., 1966.—“Pathogenesis of migrating stages of heiminths, with special reference to Strongylus vulgaris.” In, Soulsby, E. J. L., (Editor), Biology of Parasites, Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Lucker, J. T., 1934.—“The morphology and development of the preparasitic larvae of Poteriostomum ratzii.” J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 24, 302–310.Google Scholar
Lucker, J. T., 1935.—“The morphology and development of the infective larva of Cylicodontophorus ultrajeclinus (Ihle).” J. Parasit., 21, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucker, J. T., 1936.—“Comparative morphology and development of infective larvae of some horse strongyles.” Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 3, 22–25.Google Scholar
Lucker, J. T., 1938.—“Description and differentiation of infective larvae of three species of horse strongyles.” Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Poynter, D., 1958.—“A study of certain nematode parasites of the horse in Britain.” Thesis, London.Google Scholar
Russell, A. F., 1948.—“The development of helminthiasis in thoroughbred foals.” J. comp. Path. Ther., 58, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salisbury, G. W., Baker, D. W., and Britton, J. W.. 1940.—“Control of equine strongylosis; Part II; The effect of anthelmintic treatment of mares on the development of strongylosis in foals.” Cornell Vet., 30, 367–375.Google Scholar
Todd, A. C., Hansen, M. F., Kelley, G. W., Wyant, Z. M. and Hull, F. E., 1950.—“The development of helminthiasis in thoroughbred foals in central Kentucky.” Vet. Med., 45, 181–186 and 195.Google ScholarPubMed
Tiunov, V. I., 1951.—“Nodular trichonematinosis of large intestine of horses.” Dissertation Abstracts. (In Russian). Trudy gel ’mint. Lab., 5, 318–322.Google Scholar
Wetzel, R., 1942.—“Ueber die Entwicklungdauer der Palisadenwürmer im korper des Pferdes und ihre praktische Auswertung.” Dt. tierärztl. Wschr., 50, 443–444.Google Scholar
Whitlock, H. V., 1948.—“Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus.” J. Counc. sri. industr. Res. Aust., 21, 177–180.Google Scholar