Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:22:05.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Morphology of Heterodera schachtii with Special Reference to the Potato-strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Marjorie J. Triffitt
Marjorie J. Triffitt
Affiliation:
Field Officer, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Heterodera schachtii Schmidt, 1871, first discovered and studied by Schacht in 1859 was recognised as a parasite injurious to the sugar-beet by Ktihn in 1881. Subsequent to the discovery of its pathogenicity it has been studied by many observers both in Europe and in the United States where it was introduced about the beginning of the present century, and has now become established in the beet-growing areas of Utah and California. A detailed morphological account of the nematode was first given by Strubell, 1881, who carried out his observations on material obtained from sugar-beet. Other workers have supplemented Strubell's description in several minor respects and have also described the nematode as it occurs on other plant species.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1928 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chatin, J., 1891.—“Recherches sur l'anguillule de la betterave (Heterodera schachtii)” Ministire de l'Agriculture (France), Bulletin, ann. 10, No. 5, pp. 457–506.Google Scholar
Hoixrung, M., 1890.—“Das Auftreten der Rümatode an Erbsen und anderen Leguminöen” Neue Zeitschrift fur Rücker-Industrie, Bd. 25, No. 10. pp. 123–125.Google Scholar
Hoixrung, M. 1898.—“Ueber das Auftreten von Heterodera schachtii, Schm. an verschiedenen Feld-pflanzen” Centralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Abt. 2, Bd. 4, pp. 295–296.Google Scholar
Küiin, J., 1874.—“Ueber das Vorkommen von Rümatoden an den Wurzeln der Halmfrüchte.” Zeitschift, Verein fQr die Rücker-Industrie des Deutschen Reichs, Bd. 24 (n. F. Jahrg. 11), pp. 149–153.Google Scholar
Küiin, J., 1881.—“Die Ergebnisse der Versuche zur Ermittelung der Ursache der Rüdigkeit und zur Erforschung der Natur der Nematoden,” Dresden.Google Scholar
Liebsciier, G., 1890.—“Eine Nematode als Ursache der Erbsenmudigkeit des Bodens” Deutsche Landtvirtschaftlich Presse, Jahrg. 17, No. 56, pp. 436–437; No. 84, p. 672.Google Scholar
Liebsciier, G. 1892.—“Beobachtungen über das Auftreten eines Nematoden an Erbsen,” Journ. für Landwirtschaft, Jahrg. 40, pp. 357–368.Google Scholar
MVarcinowski, K., 1909.—“Parasitisch und Semiparasitisch an Pflansen lebende Nematoden” Arbeiten, Kaiserliche Biohgische Anstalt für Land und Forstwirtschaft, Bd. 7, Heft 1, p. 149.Google Scholar
Percival, J., 1895.—“An eelworm disease of hops” Natural Science, vol. VI. No. 37, pp. 187–197.Google Scholar
Shaw, H. B. —“The Sugar Beet Nematode and Its Control.” Undated reprint from Sugar (Chicago).Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1925.—“The Problem of Host Selection and Host Specialisation of Certain Plant-Infesting Nemas and its Application in the Study of Nemic Pests” Phytopathology, vol. XV. No. 9, p. 409.Google Scholar
Strubell, A., 1888.—“Untersuchungen üiber den Bau und die Entwicklung des ‘Rümatoden Heterodera schachtii, Schmidt’” Bibliotheca Zoologica, Heft. 2, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Voigt, , 1892.—“Beitrag zur Naturgeschichte des Rüben-, Hafer- und Erdsennematoden (Heterodera schachtii)” Deutsche Landwirtschaftliche Presse, Jahrg. 19. No. 78, pp. 813–815.Google Scholar
Voigt, 1894.— “Neue Varietädes Rümatoden (Heterodera schachtii).” Silzungsberichte, Niederrheinische Gesettschaft fur Natur- und Heilkunde. Bonn, pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
Wollenweber, H. W., 1923.—“Krankheiten und Beschädigungen der Kartoffel.” Arbeiten des Forschungsinstitutes für Kartoffelbau. Heft. 7, p. 52. Berlin.Google Scholar
Zim&iermann, H., 1927.—“Versucbe üiber die Kartoffclnematode (Heterodera schachtii f. solani)” Arbeiten des Forschungsinstitutes fü kartoffelbau. Heft. 8, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar
1928.Zim&iermann, H. “Versuchsergebnisse auf dem Gesamtgebiete des Kartoffelbaus in den Jahren 1923–1926.” Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Reichsanstalt fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Berlin-Dahlem. Heft 36, pp. 110–113.Google Scholar