Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-28T23:22:31.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Life-History of Heterakis gallinœ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Phyllis A. Clapham
Phyllis A. Clapham
Affiliation:
(From the Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the course of some experiments involving the Nematode worm Heterakis gallinæ, it became necessary to know the exact life history in order to interpret the results. On consulting the literature it became evident that the details of the life history had never been worked out accurately in either this worm or in any of its near relations. Further-more, there was considerable controversy on the subject. For this reason therefore the whole morphology and life history were investigated in detail and some interesting points came to light.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 1933 , pp. 67 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, J. E., 1917.—“A Means of transmitting the Fowl Nematode, Heterakis papillosa, Bloch,” Science, xlvi, 394. (W.L. 19938.)Google Scholar
Ackert, J. E., Graham, G. L., Nolf, N. O., & Porter, D. A., 1931.—“Quantitative Studies on the Administration of Variable Numbers of Nematode Eggs (Ascaridia lineata) to Chickens,” Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., (1), 206–214. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Ackert, J. E., & Herrick, C. A., 1928.—“Effects of the Nematode Ascaridia lineata (Schneider) on growing Chicks,” J. Parasit., xv, 1–13. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Bloch, M. E., 1798.—“Abhandlung von der Erzeugung der Einegeweider Würmer und den Mitteln weider diesselben. Eine von der Königlich Dänischen Sociatät der Wissenschaften zu Copenhagen gekrönte Preisschrift.” Berlin.Google Scholar
Cram, E. B., 1927.—“Bird Parasites of the Nematode Sub-orders Strongylata, Ascaridiata and Spirurata,” Smithsonia Institute U.S. Nat. Mus. Washington. Bulletin No. 140.Google Scholar
Cram, E. B., 1931.—“Developmental Stages of some Nematodes of the Spirurata, parasitic in Poultry and Game Birds,” U.S.A. Dept. Agri. Washington D.C. Technical Bulletin No. 227.Google Scholar
Dorman, H. P., 1928.—“Studies on the Life Cycle of Heterakis papillosa (Bloch),” Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., xlvii, (4), 279–313. (W.L. 21400a.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.—“Histoire naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers intestinaux.” 222–229.Google Scholar
Von Frælich, F., 1791.—“Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Einegeweiderwurmer,” Naturforschr, Halle, xxv, 52.Google Scholar
Freeborn, S. B., 1923.—“Nicotine as a Poultry Vermifuge,” Science N.Y., n.s. lvii, 692–693. (W.L. 19938.)Google Scholar
Fülleborn, F., 1929.—“On the Larval Migration of some parasitic Nematodes in the body of its host and its biological significance,” J. Helm, vii, 15–26.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, F., 1898.—“Le neoformatzioni nodulari,” Manuale di Patagonia generale comparata e sperimentale. Milano, 110.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F., 1790.—“Caroli á Linné—Systema Natur per regna trianaturæ, secundum classes ordines, generalocis vol. 1.” Editio decima tertia, sucta, reformatacure Jo. Fred. Gmelin. Pt. 6 (vermes), pp. 3021–3910.Google Scholar
Graybill, H. W., 1921.—“Data on the Development of Heterakis papillosa in the Fowl,” J. Exp. Med., xxxiv, 259–270. (W.L. 11189.)Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1782.—“Naturgeschichte,” p. 86.Google Scholar
Itagaki, S., 1930.—“The Nature of the Parasitic Nodules in the Cæcal Wall of Fowls and the Development of Heterakis Vesicularis,” Report of the 4th Wld's Poultry Congress. London. 517–519.Google Scholar
LÉtulle, M., & Marotel, G., 1909.—“Etudes des Typhlitis parasitaire nodules des Cæcmus parasitaires chez le Faisan,” Arch. Parasit, xii.Google Scholar
MÖnnig, H. O.., 1927.—“The Life Histories of Trichostrongvlus instabilis and T. rugatus of the Sheep in South Africa,” Rep. Vet. Res. S. Africa, 11 and 12. 231–251.Google Scholar
Rietz, J. H., 1930.—“Animal Parasites of Chickens in Ohio and West Virginia,” J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass., lxxvii, n.s. xxx, (1), 153–156.Google Scholar
Riley, W. A., & James, L. G., 1921.—“Studies on the Chicken Nematode, Heterakis papillosa, Bloch,” J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass., xxii.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1819.—“Entozoorum Synopsis,” 38 & 268.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., 1925.—“Intestinal Nodules in Chickens due to Heterakid larvæ (Heterakis beramporia) Lane,” Philipp. J. Sci., xxviii, (1), 1–9. (W.L. 16189).Google Scholar
Uribe, C., 1922.—“Observations on the Development of Heterakis papillosa Bloch in the Chicken,” J. Parasit, viii, (4), 167–176. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H., 1800.—“Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Einegeweider-würmer von J. A. E. Gærze,” pp. 33–36.Google Scholar