Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T06:24:31.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Remarkable New Nematode, Lappetascaris lutjani gen. et sp. nov. (Anisakidae: Ascaridoidea) from Marine Fishes of Karachi and an Account of Thynnascaris inquies (Linton, 1901) n.comb. and Goezia intermedia n.sp.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Suraiya Rasheed
Suraiya Rasheed
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three exceedingly interesting parasites of the super-family Ascaridoidea have been discussed in this paper. A new genus Lappetascaris is described from two different kinds of fish and a new subfamily has been established to include this genus. The latter is based on its peculiar head structures and the cuticle.

2. Thynnascaris inquies (Linton, 1901) n.comb, is reported for the first time since its original description, from the type host of a new locality.

3. Goezia intermedia n.sp. is described and a comparative study of the related species has been carried out.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 313 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayus, H. A., 1920.—“On the classification of the Ascaridae. I. The systematic value of certain characters of the alimentary canal.” Parasitology, 12, 253–264.Google Scholar
Bayus, H. A., 1923a.—“On the classification of the Ascaridae. III. A revision of the genus Dujardinia Gcdoelst with a description of a new genus of Anisakinae from a crocodile.” Parasitology. 15, 223–232.Google Scholar
Bayus, H. A., 1923b.—“A new Ascaris from the otter.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 11, 450–463.Google Scholar
Bayus, H. A., 1927.—“Some parasitic worms from Arapaitna gigas (Teleostean fish) with a description of Philomeira scnticosa n.sp. (Filarioidea).” Parasitology, 19, 35–47.Google Scholar
Bayus, H. A., 1936.—The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Nematoda. I (Ascaroidea and Strongyloidca). Taylor and Francis Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Byckovskaya-Pavlovskaya, et al. , 1962.—Key to the parasites of freshwater fish in the U.S.S.R. Academy of Science, Zoological Laboratories, Moscow.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1935.—“Parasites of fishes in Galveston Bay.” Proc. U.S. nat. hist. Mus.. 83, 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. and Chitwood, M. B., 1950.—An introduction to Ncmatology. Sect. I., Washington.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph., 1933.—“Thynnascaris legendrei, n.gen., n.sp., de l'estomac du Germon, Germo alalonga(Gmel.).” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 58, 7–13.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph.. 1935a.—“Sur Contracaecum, Thynnascaris et Avtplicaecum.” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 60, 88–92.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph., 1935b.—“Nématodc du genre Goexia chcz une Truite arc-en-ciel (Salmo irideus W. Gibbons) d'élevage.” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., 60, 244–265.Google Scholar
Fujita, T., 1932.—“On new nematodes (Contracaecum) in fishes of Japan.” Bull. Sch. Hokkaido, 2, 24–30.Google Scholar
Fujita, T., 1940.—“Further notes on Nematodes of Salmonoid fishes in Japan.” Japan. J. Zool. 8, 377–394.Google Scholar
Hartwich, G., 1954.—“Die Vorderdarmstrukturen, das Exkretions-system sowie der Kopfbau der Ascariden und ihre taxonomische Bedeutung.” Wiss. Zschr. Univ. Halle Math. Nat.Reihe, 3, 1171–1212.Google Scholar
Hartwich, G., 1957.—“Zur Systematik der Ncmatodcn-Superfamilie Ascaridoidea.” Zool. Jber., 85, 211–252.Google Scholar
HöSt, P., 1932.—“Phocascaris phocae, n.g., n.sp., eine neuc Askaridcnart aus Phoca groenlandica Fabr.” Zbl. Bakt., (orig.), 125, 335–340.Google Scholar
Hsu, H.F., 1933a.—“Remarks on some morphological characters of parasitic Nematodes of man and dog together with description of a new Goezia species from Yangtze beaked Sturgeon.” Chin. med. J., 47, 1289–1297.Google Scholar
Hsu, H. F., 1933b.—“Study on the ocsophageal glands of parasitic Nematoda superfamily Ascaroidea.” Chin. med. J.. 47, 1247–1288.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M., 1945.—“Parasitic Nematodes.” Rept. Brit. Austr. & New Zealand Antarct. Res. Exp. 1929–1931, Adelaide Ser.B., 5, 73–159.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. and Mawson, P. M.. 1945.—“Some parasitic Nematodes from South Australian marine fish.” Trans roy. Soc. S. Australia, 69, 114–117.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1937.—“Beitrage zur Kenntnis parasitischer Nematoden. V. Neue parasitische Nematoden aus der Forelle Salmo fario L.” Zbl. Bakt. (orig.), 140, 127–131.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T., 1909.—“A new Nematode worm from Trinidad.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 742–743.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. and Atkinson, E. L., 1914.—“Helminthsof British Antarctic Expedition 1910–1913.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 222–226.Google Scholar
Linton, E., 1901.—“Parasites of Fishes of Wood's Hole Region.” Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., 405–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, E., 1913.—“A catalogue of the Marine Fauna by Francis B. Sumner, Raymond C. Osburn And Leon J. Cole. A Biological Survey of the Waters of Wood's Hole and vicinity.” Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., 31, 549–794.Google Scholar
Lyster, L. L., 1940.—“Parasites of some Canadian Sea Mammals.” Canad. J. Res., 18, 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccallum, G. A., 1921.—“Studies in Heminthology.” Zoopathologica, 1, 137–284.Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1930.—“Parasitic Nematodes obtained from animals dying in the Calcutta Zoological Gardens.” Rec. Indian Mus., 32, 385–394.Google Scholar
Mosgovoy, A. A., 1953.—[Ascaridia of animals and man and the diseases caused by them.] (Osnovy nemalodologii) 2.Google Scholar
Osche, G., 1958.—“Beitrage zur Morphologie, Ökologie und Phylogenie der Ascaridoidea (Nematoda). Parallelen in der Evolution von Parasit und Wirt.” Z. Parasitenk., 18, 479–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osche, G., 1963.—Morphological, Biological and Ecological considerations in the Phylogeny of parasitic Nematodes. The Lower Metazoa Comparative Biology & Phylogeny, Edited by Dougherty, E. C., University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, C., 1935.—“Ascaridata e spirurata Parasitos de Peixes do Nordeste Brasileiro.” Arch. Inst. Biol. S. Paulo, 6, 53–62.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Henry, A., 1915.—“Sur les Nematodes du genre Goezia Zeder.” Bull. Soc. Path. exot.. 8, 270–275.Google Scholar
Rasheed, S., 1964.—“An interesting ascaroid from fish.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 58, 2. (Demonstration).Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., Schichobalowa, N. P. and Mosgovoy, A. A., 1951.—[Oxyurata and Ascaridata] 2.Google Scholar
Spaul, E. A., 1927.—“A new Nematode of the subfamily Anisakinae.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 19, 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanski, W., 1938.—“Goezia sigalasi n.sp., parasite d'une “vive” (Trachinus draco).” Livro Jub. L. Travassos Rio de J. 447–457.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A., 1905.—“The determination of generic types, and a list of roundworm genera, with their original and type species.” U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Anim. Ind. Bull., (79), 1–150.Google Scholar
Teixeira, De Freitas J. F. and Lent, H., 1946.—“Infestacao de Apaiaris ‘Astronotus ocellatus’ (Agassiz) Pelo Nematodco“Goezia spinulosa” (Diesing 1839).” Rev. bras. Biol., 6, 215–222.Google Scholar
Wu, H. W., 1949.—“A note on two parasitic nematodes of fishes.” Sinensia, 20, 51–57.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1941.—“Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan, part 33. Nematodes of Fishes II.” Japan. J. Zool., 9, 343–396.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1961.—Systema Helminthum, 3.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. and Maplestone, P. A., 1926.—The Nematode parasites of Vertebrates. J. & A. Churchill, London.Google Scholar