Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-22T01:16:15.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heterologous transmission with Dictyocaulus capreolus from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to cattle (Bos taurus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

B.P. Divina
Affiliation:
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños College, Laguna, 4031 Philippines
J. Höglund*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology (SWEPAR), National Veterinary Institute and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +46(0)18 67 309162 E-mail: johan.hoglund@sva.se

Abstract

Eight Swedish Red Breed cattle, about 2 months old, were experimentally infected with a Swedish isolate of Dictyocaulus viviparus (Dviv-Se) from cattle and D. capreolus from roe deer. The aims were to determine whether the roe deer lungworm is infective to cattle or if it can induce seroconversion in cattle against D. viviparus as measured with an ELISA. Four calves which were given 500 Dviv-Se infective larvae (L3) each by larval dosing for two successive days developed patent infection between days 23 and 25 post-inoculation (PI). Larval output varied among the calves and during the patent period. However, maximum recovery occurred between 28 and 56 days PI with peak shedding on day 37 PI. Shedding ceased at day 58 PI and adult worms were recovered from one calf at necropsy (day 67 PI). No immature worms were recovered from the lungs at necropsy. Seroconversion was detected on days 35–42 PI. One Dviv-Se infected calf became seronegative on day 67 PI whereas the other calves still remained seropositive during this period. Prepatency and patency periods of D. viviparus and serological findings in this study basically conform to previous studies. Each calf that was infected with 400 L3 of D. capreolus for two successive days, and about 800 L3 of the same species about 8 weeks later, did not develop to patency based on faecal and post-mortem examinations. Consequently, under the conditions of this study, D. capreolus was not infective to cattle. Two of the four calves that were infected with L3 from roe deer were challenged with L3 cultured from faeces of the Dviv-Se-infected calves. This infection did not develop to patency. Whether this was due to cross-protection as a result of the prior priming with L3 from roe deer is not clear. However, if it is so, it opens up the possibility of using D. capreolus L3 for preventing bovine dictyocauliasis.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, (1986) Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Reference Book 418, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 17.Google Scholar
Bienioschek, S., Rehbein, S. & Ribbeck, R. (1996) Cross-infections between fallow deer and domestic ruminants with large lungworms (Dictyocaulus spp). Applied Parasitology 37, 229238.Google ScholarPubMed
Boon, J.H., Kloosterman, A. & Breukink, M. (1984) Parasitological, serological and clinical effects of continuous graded levels of Dictyocaulus viviparus inoculations in calves. Veterinary Parasitology 16, 261272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christenssen, D. & Rehbinder, C. (1975) Parasiter hos renkalv–en träckprovsunderökning (Parasites in reindeer calves–faecal examination). Nordic Veterinary Medicine 27, 496498.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J.W.W., Borgsteede, F.H.M. & van Milligen, F.J. (1997) Evaluation of an ELISA for the routine diagnosis of Dictyocaulus viviparus infections in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 70, 153164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrigall, W., Coutts, A.G., Watt, C.F., Hunter, A.R. & Munro, R. (1988) Comparison by experimental infections in cattle of a Dictyocaulus species occuring naturally in red deer and Dictyocaulus of bovine origin. Veterinary Record 122, 302304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divina, B., Wilhelmsson, E., Mattsson, J.G., Waller, P.J. & Höglund, J. (2000) Identification of Dictyocaulus spp. in ruminants by morphological and molecular analyses. Parasitology 121, 193201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enigk, K. & Hildebrandt, J. (1965) Host specificity of Dictyocaulus species in ruminants. Veterinary Medicine Review 2, 8097.Google Scholar
Enigk, K. & Hildebrandt, J. (1969) Susceptibility of ruminants to D. viviparus and D. filaria . Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin 16, 6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epe, C., Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.V. & Schnieder, T. (1997) Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of lungworm species (Nematoda: Dictyocaulidae) from fallow deer, cattle, sheep and donkeys. Research in Veterinary Science 62, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, L.M. & Höglund, J. (2002) Dictyocaulus capreolus n. sp. (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) from roe deer, Capreolus capreolus and moose. Alces alces in Sweden. Journal of Helminthology 76, 119124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R.P. & Gibbs, H.C. (1971) Infectivity of Dictyocaulus viviparus (moose strain) to calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 12, 56.Google Scholar
Höglund, J., Wilhelmsson, E., Christensson, D., Waller, P. & Mattsson, J.G. (1999) ITS2 sequences of Dictyocaulus species from cattle, roe deer and moose in Sweden: molecular evidence for a new species. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 607611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarrett, W.F., Jennings, F.W., McIntyre, W.I.M., Mulligan, W., Sharp, N.C.C. & Urquhart, G.M. (1960) The disease process. Veterinary Record 72, 10661067.Google Scholar
Mason, P.C. (1985) Biology and control of the lungworm Dictyocaulus viviparus in farmed red deer in New Zealand. Royal Society New Zealand Bulletin 22, 119121.Google Scholar
Nilsson, O. (1971) The inter-relationship of endo-parasites in wild cervids (Capreolus capreolus L, and Alces alces L.) and domestic ruminants. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 12, 3668.Google ScholarPubMed
Presidente, P.J., Worley, D.E. & Catlin, J.E. (1972) Cross-transmission experiments with Dictyocaulus viviparus isolates from Rocky Mountain elk and cattle. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 8, 5762.Google ScholarPubMed
Pybus, M.J. (1990) Survey of hepatic and pulmonary helminths of wild cervids in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 26, 453459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roepstorff, A., Eriksen, L., Slotved, H.C. & Nansen, P. (1997) Experimental Ascaris suum infection in the pig: worm population kinetics following single inoculations with three doses of infective eggs. Parasitology 115, 443452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, R. & Lucker, J. (1956) The couse and pathogenicity of initial infections with Dictyocaulus viviparus . American Journal of Veterinary Research 17, 217226.Google Scholar
Schnieder, T. & Daugschies, A. (1993) Dose-dependent pathophysiological changes in cattle experimentally infected with Dictyocaulus viviparus . Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin 40, 170180.Google ScholarPubMed
Seesee, F. & Worley, D. (1993) Experimental infections with Dictyocaulus viviparus in dairy calves, with observations on histopathology, peripheral blood parameters, and inhibited fourth stage larvae. Helminthologia 30, 119125.Google Scholar
Tenter, A.M., Bellmer, A. & Schnieder, T. (1993) Evaluation of an ELISA for Dictyocaulus viviparus-specific antibodies in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 47, 301314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urquhart, G.M., Jarrett, W.F. & McIntyre, W.I.M. (1973) Bovine dictyocauliasis: pathology, clinical signs, epidemiology, treatment and control. pp. 2330 in Urquhart, G.M. & Armour, J. (Eds) Helminth diseases of cattle, sheep and horses in Europe. Proceeding of Workshop held at the Veterinary School of University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Urquhart, G.M., Armour, J., Duncan, J.L., Dunn, A.M. & Jennings, F.W. (1996) Veterinary parasitology 307 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar