Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T20:10:47.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exposure of Caged Biomphalaria glabrata (Say) to Investigate Dispersion of Miracidia of Schistosoma mansoni Sambon in Outdoor Habitats in St. Lucia *

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Edward Suchart Upatham
Edward Suchart Upatham*
Affiliation:
Research and Control Department, P.O. Box 93, Castries, St. Lucia, West Indies
*
*Staff member The Rockefeller Foundation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Laboratory studies showed two types of cages to be suitable for exposing uninfected B. glabrata in field habitats as a means of locating S. mansoni miracidial infestations.

2. Tests conducted in tanks under simulated field conditions showed that miracidia moved away from the point of inoculation in non-random fashion and congregated at the margins of the tanks.

3. In a natural habitat, miracidia located and infected caged snails at distances of 33 cm vertically and 106·7 cm horizontally.

4. The pattern of infection was similar in the simulated field and field experiments, but field infection rates were lower.

5. For transmission studies in field habitats, caged laboratorybred snails should be placed at the margin of the habitat to ensure the maximum snail-miracidium interaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , December 1972 , pp. 297 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Part of a thesis submitted to the University of Michigan in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Natural Resources

References

REFERENCES

Barbosa, F. S. and Carneiro, E., 1965.—“Penetration of S. mansoni miracidia in abnormal hosts”. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo, 7, 99–102.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. R. and Kendall, D. G., 1953.—“The random walk of Tricho strongylus retortaeformis”. Biometrics, 9, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernin, E., 1970.—“Behavioural responses of miracidia of S. mansoni and other trematodes to substances emitted by snails”. J. Parasit., 56, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernin, E., AND Donavan, C. A., 1902.—“The influence of host-parasite dispersion upon the capacity of S. mansoni miracidia to infect A. glabratus”. Am. J. irop. Med. Hyg., 11, 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etges, F. J. and DECKER, C. L., 1903.—“Chemosensitivity of the miracidium of S. mansoni to A. glabratus and other snails”. J. Parasit., 49,114–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., 1924.—“The reactions of the miracidia of S. japonicum and S. haematobium in the presence of their intermediate hosts”. J. Parasit., 10, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., AND Hoffman, W. A., 1934.—“Studies on S. mansoni in Puerto Rico. HI. Biological studies. I. The extra mammalian phases of the life cycle”. Puerto RicoJ. publ. Hlth trop, Med., 10, 1–49.Google Scholar
Mcclelland, W. F. J., 1965.—“Exposure of laboratory bred snails in natural situations. In East African Institute for Medical Research, Annual Report 1903–1904. Mwanza, Tanzania, pp. 18–20.Google Scholar
MacInnis, A. J., 1965.—“Responses of S. mansoni miracidia to chemical attractants.” J. Parasit., 51, 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malek, A. E., 1959.—“Susceptibility of the snail B. boissyi to infection with certain strains of S. mansoni”. Am. J. trop. Med., 30, 887–894.Google Scholar
Shiff, C. J., 1968.—“Location of Bulinus (Physopsis) globosus by miracidia of S. haematobium”. J. Parasit., 54, 1133–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiff, C. J., 1969.—“Influence of light and depth on location of Bulinus globosus by miracidia of S. haematobium”. J. Parasit., 55, 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiff, C. J., and Kriel, R. L., 1970.—“A water-soluble product of Bulinus globosus attractive to S. haemalobium miracidia”. J. Parasit., 56, 281–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, O. D., (1949.—“Experimental schistosomiasis. II. Maintenance of S. mansoni in the laboratory, with some notes on experimental infection with S. haematobium”. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 43, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H., 1900.—“Principles and procedures of statistics”. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Upatham, E. S., 1970.—“Bionomics of S. mansoni”. Ph.D thesis : University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Michigan. 187 pp.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J., 1902.—“Statistical principles in experimental design”. pp. 77–85, McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., 1966.—“Relationships between schistosomes and their molluscan hosts in Africa”. J. Helminth., 40, 402–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed