Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:36:08.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental infection and adaptation of Rodentolepis nana to the Mongolian jird Meriones unguiculatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Gustavo José Caldas Vianna
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Taxonomia e Biologia de Invertebrados, Departamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, PO Box 486, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30123-970, Brazil
Alan Lane de Melo*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Taxonomia e Biologia de Invertebrados, Departamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, PO Box 486, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30123-970, Brazil
*
*Fax: (+55-31) 3499 2970, E-mail:aldemelo@icb.ufmg.br

Abstract

A mouse-derived strain of Rodentolepis ( = Hymenolepis) nana was transferred to the Mongolian jird Meriones unguiculatus. It was found that M. unguiculatus has low susceptibility to R. nana mouse isolates. Likewise, adaptation of the parasite to jird hosts, in the absence of dexamethasone treatment, was not demonstrable, at least during ten-passage trials. Nevertheless, the parasite was able to establish, grow and develop to gravid adults in M. unguiculatus treated daily with dexamethasone. Prepatent periods in dexamethasone-treated jirds in ten-passage series ranged from 10 to 17 days post-infection (DPI), the average being 12 days, and the patent periods lasted from 18 to 30 DPI, with an average of 25 days. The population pattern of faecal egg output in immunosuppressed jirds suggests that under a daily dexamethasone treatment protocol, the parasite is able to maintain egg production as long as treatment is sustained.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreassen, J. (1997) Interaction between intestinal tapeworms and their hosts: present knowledge and problems. Parassitologia 39, 259267.Google ScholarPubMed
Baer, J.C. & Tenora, F. (1970) Some species of Hymenolepis (Cestoidea) from rodents and primates. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Bohemoslovacae-Brno 4, 132.Google Scholar
Barbosa, M.D.M.S. (1975) Alguns aspectos do parasitismo, experimental em murídeos e natural em humanos, por Hymenolepis nana (Von Siebold, 1852), Blanchard, 1891 (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae). 43 pp. Belo Horizonte, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
De Rycke, P.H. (1966) Development of the cestode Hymenolepis microstoma in Mus musculus. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 27, 350354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duclos, L.M. & Richardson, D.J. (2000) Hymenolepis nana in pet store rodents. Comparative Parasitology 67, 197–201.Google Scholar
Ferretti, G., Gabriele, F. & Palmas, C. (1981) Development of human and mouse strain of Hymenolepis nana in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 11, 425430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghandour, A.M., Zahid, N.Z., Banaja, A.A., Kamal, K.B. & Bouq, A.I. (1995) Zoonotic intestinal parasites of the hamadryas baboons Papio hamadryas in the western and northern regions of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 98, 431439.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, L., Pinto, R.M., Vicente, J.J., Noronha, D. & Gomes, D.C. (1998) Helminth parasites of conventionally maintained laboratory mice – II. Inbred strains with an adaptation of the anal swab technique. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 93, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, W.A., Pons, J.A. & Janer, J.L. (1934) Sedimentation concentration method in Schistosomiasis mansoni. Puerto Rico Journal of Public Health and Tropical Medicine 9, 283298.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C.A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972) The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice. Parasitology 64, 401412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunninen, A.V. (1935) Studies on life history and host–parasite relations of Hymenolepis fraterna (H. nana var. fraterna Stiles) in white mouse. American Journal of Hygiene 22, 414443.Google Scholar
Isaak, D.D., Jacobson, R.H. & Reed, N.D. (1977) The course of Hymenolepis nana infections in thymus-deficient mice. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 55, 504513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishih, A., Nishimura, M. & Sano, M. (1992) Differential establishment and survival of Hymenolepis diminuta in syngeneic and outbred rat strains. Journal of Helminthology 66, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishih, A., Sekijima, T., Asakawa, M., Tenora, F. & Uchikawa, R. (2003) Hymenolepis pseudodiminuta Tenora et al. 1994 from Apodemus speciosus and H. diminuta: a comparison of experimental infection in rats. Parasitology Research 89, 297301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A. (1982) Induction of adult formation from cysticercoid of Hymenolepis nana established in Fischer (F344) rat with cortisone acetate. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 31, 141–146.Google Scholar
Ito, A. (1983) Hymenolepis nana: maturation in an immunosuppressed unnatural rat host. Experimental Parasitology 56, 318326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A. (1984) Stage-specific immunogens of Hymenolepis nana in mice. Journal of Helminthology 58, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, A. (1997) Basic and applied immunology in cestode infections: from Hymenolepis to Taenia and Echinococcus. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 12031211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A. & Kamiyama, T. (1987) Cortisone-sensitive, innate resistance to Hymenolepis nana infection in congenitally athymic nude rats. Journal of Helminthology 61, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S.S. & Conder, G.A. (1996) Infectivity of Hymenolepis diminuta for the jird, Meriones unguiculatus, and utility of this model for anthelmintic studies. Journal of Parasitology 82, 492495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsh, J.E. (1944) Comparative studies on mouse strain Hymenolepis nana var. fraterna, in different species and varieties of mice. Journal of Parasitology 30, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litchford, R.G. (1963) Observations on Hymenolepis microstoma in three laboratory hosts: Mesocricetus auratus, Mus musculus, and Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Parasitology 49, 403410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lussier, G. & Loew, F.M. (1970) Natural Hymenolepis nana in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Canadian Veterinary Journal 11, 105–107.Google ScholarPubMed
Macnish, M.G., Morgan, U.M., Behnke, J.M. & Thompson, R.C.A. (2002a) Failure to infect laboratory rodent hosts with human isolates of Rodentolepis ( = Hymenolepis) nana. Journal of Helminthology 76, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macnish, M.G., Morgan, U.M., Monis, P.T. & Behnke, J.M. (2002b) A molecular phylogeny of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences in Hymenolepis nana (Cestoda) supports the existence of a cryptic species. Parasitology 125, 567575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melo, A.L., Neri, F.M. & Ferreira, M.B. (1997) Helmintos de sauás, Callicebus personatus nigrifrons (Spix, 1823, Primates: Cebidae), coletados em resgate faunístico durante a construção da Usina Hidrelétrica de Nova Ponte, MG. pp. 193–198 in Souza, M.B.C. & Menezes, A.L.L. (Eds) A Primatologia no Brasil. Natal, Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia.Google Scholar
Murray, P.D., Foster, W.B. & Passmore, H.C. (1984) Hymenolepis microstoma: mouse differences in resistance to a challenge infection. Experimental Parasitology 58, 325332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, L.R., Neri, F.M., Frahia, V.T. & Melo, A.L. (2003) Parasitismo natural em Sauás, Callicebus nigrifons (Spix, 1823): Variação na eliminação de ovos de Nematoda e Cestoda. Neotropical Primates 11, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, R.M., Vicente, J.J., Noronha, D., Gonçalves, L. & Gomes, D.C. (1994) Helminth parasites of conventionally maintained laboratory mice. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 89, 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, R.M., Gonçalves, L., Gomes, D.C. & Noronha, D. (2001) Helminth fauna of golden hamster Mesocricetus auratus in Brazil. Contemporary Topics on Laboratory Animal Science 40, 20–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinto, R.M., Gomes, D.C., Menezes, R.C., Muniz-Pereira, L.C. & Noronha, D. (2003) First natural helminth infection in the mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus (Rodentia, Muridae), parasitized with Dentostomella translucida (Nematoda, Heteroxynematidae) in the neotropical region. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63, 173175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiller, E.L. (1959a) Experimental studies on morphological variation in the cestode genus Hymenolepis. II. Growth, development and reproduction of the strobilate phase of H. nana in different mammalian host species. Experimental Parasitology 8, 215235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiller, E.L. (1959b) Experimental studies on morphological variation in the cestode genus Hymenolepis IV. Influence of the host on variation in H. nana. Experimental Parasitology 8, 581590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorb, D.A. (1933) Host–parasite relations of Hymenolepis fraterna in the rat and the mouse. American Journal of Hygiene 18, 74–113.Google Scholar
Siles-Lucas, M. & Hemphill, A. (2002) Cestode parasites: application of in vivo and in vitro models for studies on the host–parasite relationship. Advances in Parasitology 51, 134194.Google ScholarPubMed
Stradowski, M. (2004) The development of Hymenolepis diminuta tapeworms of inbred line WMS il1 in rats of the WAG alb. race in primary and secondary infections of varying intensity. Helminthologia 41, 9–14.Google Scholar
Turton, J.A. (1971) Distribution and growth of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat, hamster and mouse. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 37, 315329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Haeren, C. & De Rycke, P.H. (1984) Hymenolepis muris-sylvaticae in laboratory rodents. Journal of Helminthology 58, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodland, W.N.F. (1924) On the development of the human Hymenolepis nana (Siebold, 1852) in the white mouse with remark in H. fraterna, H. longior and H. diminuta. Parasitology 16, 6983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar