Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T17:28:38.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of flubendazole on the number of first-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis released in the faeces of treated rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Jun Maki
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, 228 Japan
Toshio Yanagisawa
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, 228 Japan

Abstract

The effect of flubendazole orally administered at 10 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days (the 11th, 20th or 40th post-infection) on the number of first-stage larvae (L1) of Angiostrongylus cantonensis released in the faeces of rats each infected with 40 third-stage larvae was determined. Faecal examination for 5 months, the period from medication to dissection of rats, showed that L1 release ceased in all the rats of medicated groups by about 1 week after the termination of dosing and resumed 1–2 months later in 86% of the rats which were dissected at the end of experiments with the recovery of adult worms of both sexes. Throughout the period of 5 months, about 2–4×104 L1/gram of fresh faeces was recorded in non-medicated control groups. There was a 38–79% reduction in adult worms at the dissection. Microscopic examination of the uteri of the remaining adult worms and lung tissues of rats confirmed no normal egg production in the adult worms from rats of medicated groups, except the rats with the resumption of faecal L1 release.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alicata, J. E. (1965) Biology and distribution of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis, and its relationship to eosinophilic meningoencephalitis and other neurological disorders of man and animals. In: Advances in Parasitology (editor Dawes, B.), pp. 223248. Academic Press: London and New York.Google Scholar
Ambu, S. & Mak, J. W. (1981) The effect of mebendazole and flubendazole on Angiostrongylus malaysiensis infection in rats. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 12, 228230.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. C. & Denham, D. A. (1983) Chemotherapy, In: Trichinella and Trichinosis (editor Campbell, W. C.), pp. 335366. Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court, J. P. (1982) A diffusion chamber technique for detecting compounds with clinical prophylactic activity against Brugia pahangi. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 33, 8386.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuckler, A. C., Egerton, J. R. & Alicata, J. E. (1965) Therapeutic effect of thiabendazole on Angiostrongylus cantonensis infections in rats. Journal of Parasitology, 51, 392396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Burbure, G. & Kumar, V. & Vanparijs, O. (1986) Prophylactic activity of flubendazole-medicated feed on Brugia pahangi infection of multimammate rats. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 80, 455457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denham, D. A. (1980) Anthelmintic properties of flubendazole against Dipetalonema viteae in jirds. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 74, 829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denham, D. A., Samad, R., Cho, S-Y., Suswillo, R. R. & Skippins, S. C. (1979) The anthelmintic effects of flubendazole on Brugia pahangi. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 73, 673676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devaney, E., Howells, R. E. & Smith, G. (1985) Brugia pahangi in the BALB/c mouse: a model for testing filaricidal compounds. Journal of Helminthology, 59, 9599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kino, H. (1984) Parasite density and the fecundity of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats. Parasitology, 89, 275285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwong, Y. W. & Dobson, C. (1982) Population dynamics of Angiostrongylus cantonensis during primary infections in rats. Parasitology, 85, 399409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, R., Hayashi, Y. & Shibuya, T. (1988) Basic studies on the laboratory assessment of macrofilaricides using Brugia malayi in the jird, Meriones unguiculatus. 2. Establishment and evaluation of a new method of macrofilaricide assessment. Japanese Journal of Experimental Medicine, 58, 4549.Google ScholarPubMed
Mak, J. W. (1981) Antifilarial activity of mebendazole and flubendazole on Breinlia booliati. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 75, 306307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maki, J. & Yanagisawa, T. (1980) Acid phosphatase activity demonstrated in the nematodes, Dirofilaria immitis and Angiostrongylus cantonensis with special reference to the characters and distribution. Parasitology, 80, 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, J. & Yanagisawa, T. (1983) A comparison of the effects of flubendazole and thiabendazole on the larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Trichinella spiralis, Diphyllobothrium erinacei and Hymenolepis nana in mice. Parasitology, 87, 525531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maki, J. & Yanagisawa, T. (1985) Larvicidal effect of flubendazole on Angiostrongylus cantonensis in mice with various worm burdens. Journal of Helminthology, 59, 301302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maki, J. & Yanagisawa, T. (1986) Studies on anthelmintic effects of flubendazole and mebendazole on the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis in mice and rats. Journal of Parasitology, 72, 512516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maki, J. & Yanagisawa, T. (1988) Comparative efficacy of flubendazole and mebendazole on encysted larvae of Trichinella spiralis (USA strain) in the diaphragm of mice and rats. Journal of Helminthology, 62, 3539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michiels, M., Hendriks, R. & Heykants, J. (1982) The pharmacokinetics of mebendazole and flubendazole in animals and man. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie, 256, 180191.Google Scholar
Reddy, A. B., Rao, U. R., Chandrashekar, R., Shrivastava, R. & Subrahmanyam, D. (1983) Comparative efficacy of some benzimidazoles and amoscanate (Go. 9333) against experimental filarial infections. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 34, 259262.Google ScholarPubMed
Terada, M., Dharejo, A. M., Ishii, A. I., Nacapunchai, D. & Sano, M. (1987) Effects of milbemycin D on adult Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats. Parasitology Research, 73, 375380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thienpont, D., Vanparijs, O., Niemegeers, C. & Marsboom, R. (1978) Biological and pharmacological properties of flubendazole. Arzneimittel-Forschung, 28, 605612.Google ScholarPubMed
van den Bossche, H., Rochette, F. & Hörig, C. (1982) Mebendazole and related anthelmintics. Advances in Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 19, 67127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kerckhoven, I. & Kumar, V. (1988) Macrofilaricidal activity of oral flubendazole on Brugia pahangi. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 82, 890891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanparijs, O., Hermans, L. & Thienpont, D. (1979) Anthelmintic activity of flubendazole against Trichinella spiralis in rats. Veterinary Parasitology, 5, 237242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yii, C.-Y. (1976) Clinical observations on eosinophilic meningitis and meningoencephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Taiwan. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 25, 233249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar