Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-6q656 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T11:21:00.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some debatable questions of Germanic prosody

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Anatoly Liberman
Anatoly Liberman
Affiliation:
University of MinnesotaMinneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All scholars think that they express themselves clearly; they also expect that their arguments will carry immediate conviction. Polemical notes show how mistaken they are. In this rejoinder I will attempt to clarify my position and add a few new arguments.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 1990 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Anderson, Stephen R. 1974. The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
D'Alquen, Richard, 1988. Germanic accent, grammatical change and the laws of unaccented syllables. Canadian studies in German language and literature, 36. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger, 1988. “The ‘Akzentumsprung’ of Old English eo.” Duncan-Rose, Caroline, Vennemann, Theo, eds., On language, rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica. A Festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 221–32.Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1970. Altnordische Grammatik. 5th ed.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard, 1951. Altenglische Grammatik by Brunner, Karl. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Francis A. 1895. “Verner's Law in Gothic.” In his: Germanic Studies. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press. Pp. 7–26.Google Scholar