Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T18:20:59.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEWS - Pronomen und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Untersuchungen zum grammatischen Wandel einer deutschen Minderheiten-sprache in romanischer Umgebung. By Agnes Kolmer (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beiheft 150.) Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. 2012. Pp. 253. Paperback. €47,00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2014

Ermenegildo Bidese
Ermenegildo Bidese*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Trento
*
Università degli Studi di Trento, Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia, Via Tommaso Gar 14, ITA – 38122 Trento, Italy [e.bidese@lett.unitn.it]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 65 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacher, Josef. 1905. Die deutsche Sprachinsel Lusern. Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
Bayer, Joseph. 1984. Comp in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3. 209-274.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1989. Dialect variation and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo. 2004. Die Zimbern und ihre Sprache: Geographische, historische und sprachwissenschaftlich relevante Aspekte. “Alte” Sprachen, ed. by Stolz, Thomas, 3–42. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo. 2008. Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, & Tomaselli, Alessandra. 2007. Diachronic development in isolation: The loss of V2 phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte 210. 209-228.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. Syntactic microvariation, ed. by Barbiers, Sjef, Cornips, Leonie, & Van der Kleij, Susanne. Available at http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/books/synmic.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, & Tomaselli, Alessandra. 2000. L'interazione tra germanico e romanzo in due “isole linguistiche.” Cimbro e ladino centrale a confronto. Isole linguistiche? Per un'analisi dei sistemi in contatto, ed. by Marcato, Gianna, 163–176. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, & Tomaselli, Alessandra. 2002. La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: Cimbro e Sappadino a confronto. La dialettologia oltre il 2001, ed. by Marcato, Gianna, 237–252. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1992. Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. Language death. Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa, ed. by Brenzinger, Matthias, 59–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmeller, Johann Andreas. 1838. Ueber die sogenannten Cimbern der VII und XIII Communen auf den Venedischen Alpen und ihre Sprache. Denkschriften der bayer. Akademie der Wissenschaften 15, Abhandlungen der philos.-philol. Klasse 2. 555-708.Google Scholar
Schmeller, Johann Andreas. 1855. Cimbrisches Wörterbuch, das ist deutsches Idiotikon der VII. und XIII. Comuni in den venetianischen Alpen, ed. by Bergmann, Joseph. Wien: Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects don't make it. Folia Linguistica 33. 225-251.Google Scholar
Tyroller, Hans. 2003. Grammatische Beschreibung des Zimbrischen von Lusern. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar