Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T04:44:37.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OE-estre and PGmc. *-ārjaz: The origin and development of two agentive suffixes in Germanic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Garry W. Davis
Garry W. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukee, WI 53201
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

PGmc. *-ārjaz was borrowed from Latin, and became a productive masculine agentive suffix in the older Germanic languages, gradually displacing various native agentive suffixes. Despite some assertions to the contrary, OE -estre can be shown to have been a feminine agentive suffix of Germanic origin that was also applied to certain feminine animal names. During the Old English period, a pattern obtained whereby masculine agent nouns were frequently derived using -ere (< PGmc. *-ārjaz), while the corresponding feminine agent nouns used -estre. This system was partially preserved in Modern Dutch, but died out in English as -er was increasingly used to form agent nouns of both genders.*

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 103 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Barnhart, Robert K. 1988. The Barnhart dictionary of etymology. New York: Wilson.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm. 1981. Gotische Grammatik. Mit Lesestük-ken und Wörterverzeichnis. 19th ed. Ed. Ebbinghaus, Ernst A.. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bezzenberger, Adalbert. 1874. “Awistr und *nawistr.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 22:276–8.Google Scholar
Brink, Bernhard ten. 1882. “Das altenglische Suffix -ere” Anglia 5:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Garry W. 1988. “The origin of Middle Dutch -ster.” Papers from the third interdisciplinary onference on Netherlandic studies. Ed. Broos, Ton J.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Pp. 231–235.Google Scholar
Davis, Garry W. 1988. forthcoming. “The word sheep in the West Germanic languages.” Indogermanische Forschungen 91:118–135Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1980. “Universalienvon Agens-Wortbildungen.” Wege zur Universalien-Forschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjacob Seiler. Ed. Brettschneider, Gunter and Lehmann, Christian. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 145. Tübingen: Narr. Pp. 110–114.Google Scholar
Frings, Theodor. 1932. “Persönliche Feminina im Westgermanischen.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 56:23–40.Google Scholar
Goebel, Julius. 1900. “The Germanic suffix -ar-ja.” Publications of the Modern Language Association 15:321–325.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1927. “The ending ‘-ster’.” Modem language review 22:129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1899. Nominate Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken altgermanischer Dialekte. Ergänzungsreihe, 1. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1989. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 22. ed. Ed. Seebold, Elmar. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahe, Hans and Meid, Wolfgang. 1967. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. 3: Wortbildungslehre. Sammlung Göschen, 1218/1218a/1218b. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lindheim, Bogislav von. 1958. “Die weiblichen Genussuffixe im Altenglischen.” Anglia 76:479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loey, Adolphe van. 1959. Schönfelds historische Grammatica van het Nederlands. Zutphen: W. J. Thieme.Google Scholar
Murray, James A. H., Bradley, Henry, Craigie, W.A. and Onions, C.T., eds. 1933. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
OED, see Murray, et al. 1933.Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann. 1877. “Über das eingedrungene s in der nominalen suffixform -stra- und vor dental anlautenden personalendungen des deutschen, griechischen und altbaktrischen verbums.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 23:311–333.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 1. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Schröder, Edward. 1922. “Die Nomina Agentis auf-ster.” Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 48:1–8.Google Scholar
Stratmann, F. H. 1880. “Altenglisch -ere (-ære, -are).” Englische Studien 3:273.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Albert Morey. 1947. “Gothic morphological notes.” Journal of English and Germanic philology 46:92–97.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Albert Morey. 1951. “Miscellaneous Gothic notes.” Germanic review 26:50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sütterlin, L.. 1887. Geschichte der Nomina agentis im Germanischen. Straßburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Jan de. 1971. Nederlands etymologisch woordenboek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Otto. 1971. Die Suffixablösung bei den Nomina agentis während der althochdeutschen Periode. Philologische Studien und Quellen, 56. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar