Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T12:29:48.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The wall pressure signature of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

MATTEO BERNARDINI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Meccanica e Aeronautica, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Roma, Italy
SERGIO PIROZZOLI*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Meccanica e Aeronautica, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Roma, Italy
FRANCESCO GRASSO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Meccanica e Aeronautica, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Roma, Italy
*
Email address for correspondence: sergio.pirozzoli@uniroma1.it

Abstract

The structure of wall pressure fluctuations beneath a turbulent boundary layer interacting with a normal shock wave at Mach number M = 1.3 is studied exploiting a direct numerical simulation database. Upstream of the interaction, in the zero-pressure-gradient region, pressure statistics compare well with canonical low-speed boundary layers in terms of fluctuation intensities, space–time correlations, convection velocities and frequency spectra. Across the interaction zone, the root-mean-square wall pressure fluctuations attain very large values (in excess of 162 dB), with a maximum increase of about 7 dB from the upstream level. The two-point wall pressure correlations become more elongated in the spanwise direction, indicating an increase of the pressure-integral length scales, and the convection velocities (determined from space–time correlations) are reduced. The interaction qualitatively modifies the shape of the frequency spectra, causing enhancement of the low-frequency Fourier modes and inhibition of the higher ones. In the recovery region past the interaction, the pressure spectra collapse very accurately when scaled with either the free-stream dynamic pressure or the maximum Reynolds shear stress, and exhibit distinct power-law regions with exponent −7/3 at intermediate frequencies and −5 at high frequencies. An analysis of the pressure sources in the Lighthill's equation for the instantaneous pressure has been performed to understand their contributions to the wall pressure signature. Upstream of the interaction the sources are mainly located in the proximity of the wall, whereas past the shock, important contributions to low-frequency pressure fluctuations are associated with long-lived eddies developing far from the wall.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. 1951 Pressure fluctuations in isotropic turbulence. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 47, 359374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, W. K. 1986 Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1967 ‘Inactive’ motion and pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 241258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, P. J. K. & Babinsky, H. 2008 Unsteady shock wave dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 463473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, M. K. 1967 Wall pressure fluctuations associated with subsonic turbulent boundary layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 719754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bur, R., Benay, R., Galli, A. & Berthouze, P. 2006 Experimental and numerical study of forced shock-wave oscillations in a transonic channel. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 265278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camussi, R., Felli, M., Pereira, F., Aloisio, G. & di Marco, A. 2008 Statistical properties of wall pressure fluctuations over a forward-facing step. Phys. Fluids 20, 075113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camussi, R., Guj, G., Imperatore, B., Pizzicaroli, A. & Perigo, D. 2007 Wall pressure fluctuations induced by transonic boundary layers on a launcher model. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 11 (5), 349359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, L. & George, W. K. 2001 Similarity analysis for turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradient: outer flow. AIAA J. 39, 4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H. & Moin, P. 1990 On the space–time characteristics of wall-pressure fluctuations. Phys. Fluids 2 (8), 14501460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, K. & Keith, W. 2000 Effects of pressure gradients on turbulent boundary layer wave number frequency spectra. AIAA J. 38, 18321836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonius, T. 2004 Modeling artificial boundary conditions for compressible flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 315345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcos, G. M. 1964 The structure of the turbulent pressure field in boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 353378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, S. 2005 Numerical simulation of the transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil. AIAA J. 43, 15561566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delery, J. & Marvin, J. G. 1986 Shock-wave boundary layer interactions. Tech. Rep. 280. AGARDograph.Google Scholar
Dolling, D. S. 2001 Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J. 39, 15171531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducros, F., Ferrand, V., Nicoud, F., Weber, C., Darracq, D., Gacherieu, C. & Poinsot, T. 1999 Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 152, 517549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erm, L. P. & Joubert, J. 1991 Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farabee, T. & Casarella, M. J. 1991 Spectral features of wall pressure fluctuations beneath turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 3 (10), 24102420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FfowcsWilliams, J. E. Williams, J. E. 1965 Surface pressure fluctuations induced by boundary layer flow at finite Mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 507519.Google Scholar
George, W. K., Beuter, P. D. & Arndt, R. E. A. 1984 Pressure spectra in turbulent free shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 155191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravante, S. P., Naguib, A. M., Wark, C. E. & Nagib, H. M. 1998 Characterization of the pressure fluctuations under a fully developed turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 36, 18081816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. E. 1969 Interactions between shock waves and turbulent boundary layers. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 11, 253340.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2003 Spectra of energy dissipation, enstrophy and pressure by high-resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 72, 983986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, G. S. & Shu, C. W. 1996 Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. A. & Gruber, A. 2008 Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 16761700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1989 On the structure of pressure fluctuations in simulated turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 421451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, R. R. & Freund, J. B. 2008 The sound from mixing layers simulated with different ranges of turbulence scales. Phys. Fluids 20, 101503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. H. K. 2001 Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 37, 147196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. K. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, K. B. 1971 A study of pressure fluctuations in turbulent shear flows under the effects of mean pressure gradients. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Lund, T. S., Wu, X. & Squires, K. D. 1998 Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 233258.Google Scholar
Mabey, D. G. 1982 Comment on ‘a review of research on subsonic turbulent flow attachment’. AIAA J. 20, 1632b1632b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, Y. & Moin, P. 1998 The structure of wall-pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers with adverse pressure gradient and separation. J. Fluid Mech. 377, 347373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. 2010 Generalized conservative approximations of split convective derivative operators. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 71807190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S., Bernardini, M. & Grasso, F. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation. J. Fluid Mech. 657, 361393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schewe, G. 1983 On the structure and resolution of wall-pressure fluctuations associated with turbulent boundary-layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 311328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schloemer, H. H. 1967 Effects of pressure gradients on turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42 (1), 93113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simens, M. P., Jimnez, J., Hoyas, S. & Mizuno, Y. 2009 A high-resolution code for a turbulent boundary layers. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 42184231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Ghodbane, M. & McGrath, B. E. 1987 Surface pressure fluctuations in a separating turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 167186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988 Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Re θ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 6198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, Y., Fransson, J. H. N., Alfredsson, P. H. & Johansson, A. V. 2007 Pressure statistics and their scaling in high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, Y. & Ishihara, T. 2003 Similarity scaling of pressure fluctuation in turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 68, 026309.Google ScholarPubMed
Willmarth, W. W. & Wooldridge, C. E. 1962 Measurements of the fluctuating pressure at the wall beneath a thick turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 187210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagarola, M. V. & Smits, A. J. 1998 Mean flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 373, 3379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar