Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:16:41.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-dependent transport by convection and diffusion with exchange between two phases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

C. G. Phillips ,
S. R. Kaye  and
C. D. Robinson
C. G. Phillips
Affiliation:
Physiological Flow Studies Group, Centre for Biological and Medical Systems, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BY, UK Department of Mathematics, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BY, UK
S. R. Kaye
Affiliation:
Physiological Flow Studies Group, Centre for Biological and Medical Systems, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BY, UK
C. D. Robinson
Affiliation:
Physiological Flow Studies Group, Centre for Biological and Medical Systems, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BY, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the transport of a tracer substance through a system consisting of a tube containing flowing fluid surrounded by a wall layer in which the tracer is soluble. The fluid moves with either a Poiseuille or a uniform flow profile, and the outer boundary of the wall layer is either impermeable to tracer or absorbs it perfectly. The development of dispersive transport following the injection of tracer is described in terms of three time-dependent effective transport coefficients, viz. the fraction of tracer remaining in the system, the apparent convection velocity and the dispersion coefficient; the last two are defined in terms of the rates of change of the mean and variance of the axial tracer distribution. We assume that the timescale for tracer diffusion across the wall layer is much larger than that for diffusion across the flowing phase, and derive an asymptotic approximation corresponding to each timescale. Numerical results are given to illustrate sensitivity to the physical parameters of the system. It is shown that if the coefficients are based on tracer concentration in the fluid phase alone, as in previous work, paradoxical behaviour, such as negative apparent convection velocities, can result; we therefore base our results on averages of concentration over both phases. On the shorter timescale (the same timescale over which Taylor dispersion develops) at leading order it is found that the influence of the wall layer can be characterized by a single dimensionless parameter, and that conditions at the outer boundary have no effect. In many cases transport is also rather insensitive to the form of the flow profile. On the longer timescale, at leading order the influence of the wall layer is characterized by another dimensionless parameter, and unless uptake is very small diffusion within the layer is the rate-determining process; consequently transport is independent of the form of the flow profile. A further important conclusion is that the usual effective convection and dispersion coefficients, based on spatial moments, are of little use in predicting the time-varying concentration at a fixed position, because the spatial concentration profile becomes Gaussian only over the longer timescale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 297 , 25 August 1995 , pp. 373 - 401
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1972 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Aris, R. 1956 On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 235, 67–77.Google Scholar
Aris, R. 1959 On the dispersion of a solute by diffusion, convection and exchange between phases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 252, 538–550.Google Scholar
Davidson, M. R. & Schroter, R. C. 1983 A theoretical model of absorption of gases by the bronchial wall. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 313–335.Google Scholar
Gill, W. N. & Sankarasubramanian, R. 1970 Exact analysis of unsteady convective diffusion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 316, 341–350.Google Scholar
Jayaraman, G., Pedley, T.J. & Goyal, A. 1995 Dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a curved tube with absorbing walls. In preparation.
Lungu, E. M. & Moffatt, H. K. 1982 The effect of wall conductance on heat diffusion in duct flow. J. Engng Maths 16, 121–136.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. G., Kaye, S. R. & Schroter, R. C. 1994 A diameter-based reconstruction of the branching pattern of the human bronchial tree. Part I. Description and application. Respir. Physiol. 98, 193–217.Google Scholar
Purnama, A. 1988 Boundary retention effects upon contaminant dispersion in parallel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 393–412.Google Scholar
Sankarasubramanian, R. & Gill, W. N. 1973 Unsteady convective diffusion with interphase mass transfer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 333, 115–132.Google Scholar
Shankar, A. & Lenhoff, A. M. 1991 Dispersion and partitioning in short coated tubes. Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 30, 828–835.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1983 Effect of boundary absorption upon longitudinal dispersion in shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 161–177.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1954 Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 225, 473–477.Google Scholar