Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:53:39.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

A. Mashayek*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
C. P. Caulfield
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
W. R. Peltier
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: amashaye@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca

Abstract

We employ direct numerical simulation to investigate the efficiency of diapycnal mixing by shear-induced turbulence in stably stratified free shear layers for flows with bulk Richardson numbers in the range $0. 12\leq R{i}_{0} \leq 0. 2$ and Reynolds number $Re= 6000$. We show that mixing efficiency depends non-monotonically upon $R{i}_{0} $, peaking in the range 0.14–0.16, which coincides closely with the range in which both the buoyancy flux and the dissipation rate are maximum. By detailed analyses of the energetics of flow evolution and the underlying dynamics, we show that the existence of high mixing efficiency in the range $0. 14\lt R{i}_{0} \lt 0. 16$ is due to the emergence of a large number of small-scale instabilities which do not exist at lower Richardson numbers and are stabilized at high Richardson numbers. As discussed in Mashayek & Peltier (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 725, 2013, pp. 216–261), the existence of such a well-populated ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities at intermediate Richardson numbers and the subsequent high mixing efficiency is realized only if the Reynolds number is higher than a critical value which is generally higher than that achievable in laboratory settings, as well as that which was achieved in the majority of previous numerical studies of shear-induced stratified turbulence. We furthermore show that the primary assumptions upon which the widely employed Osborn (J. Phys. Oceanogr. vol. 10, 1980, pp. 83–89) formula is based, as well as its counterparts and derivatives, which relate buoyancy flux to dissipation rate through a (constant) flux coefficient ($\Gamma $), fail at higher Richardson numbers provided that the Reynolds number is sufficiently high. Specifically, we show that the assumptions of fully developed, stationary, and isotropic turbulence all break down at high Richardson numbers. We show that the breakdown of these assumptions occurs most prominently at Richardson numbers above that corresponding to the maximum mixing efficiency, a fact that highlights the importance of the non-monotonicity of the dependence of mixing efficiency upon Richardson number, which we establish to be characteristic of stratified shear-induced turbulence. At high $R{i}_{0} $, the lifecycle of the turbulence is composed of a rapidly growing phase followed by a phase of rapid decay. Throughout the lifecycle, there is considerable exchange of energy between the small-scale turbulence and larger coherent structures which survive the various stages of flow evolution. Since shear instability is one of the most prominent mechanisms for turbulent dissipation of energy at scales below hundreds of metres and at various depths of the ocean, our results have important implications for the inference of turbulent diffusivities on the basis of microstructure measurements in the oceanic environment.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barenblatt, G. I., Bertsch, M., Passo, R. Dal, Prostokishin, V. M. & Ughi, M. 1993 A mathematical model of turbulent heat and mass transfer in stably stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 253, 341358.Google Scholar
Billant, P. & Chomaz, J. M. 2001 Self-similarity of strongly stratified inviscid flows. Phys. Fluids 13, 16451651.Google Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Billant, P., Lindborg, E. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2007 Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 343368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britter, R. E. 1974 An experiment on turbulence in a density-stratified fluid. PhD thesis, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 2000 Anatomy of the mixing transition in homogeneous and stratified free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 413, 147.Google Scholar
Caulfield, C. P., Tang, W. & Plasting, S. C. 2004 Reynolds number dependence of an upper bound for the long-time-averaged buoyancy flux in plane stratified Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 498, 315332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. 1991 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 455493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, P. 1972 Numerical studies of the stability of inviscid parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 3962.Google Scholar
Holford, J. M. & Linden, P. F. 1999 Turbulent mixing in a stratified fluid. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 30, 173198.Google Scholar
Howard, L. N. 1961 Note on a paper of John W. Miles. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 509512.Google Scholar
Ivey, G. N. & Imberger, J. 1991 On the nature of turbulence in a stratified fluid. Part 1. The energetics of mixing J. Phys. Oceanogr. 21, 650658.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, G. N., Winters, K. B. & Koseff, J. R. 2008 Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 169184.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1985 The onset of turbulence in finite amplitude Kelvin–Helmholtz billows. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1991 The influence of stratification on secondary instabilities in free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 71106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, C. G. 1976 Instability and turbulence in a stratified shear layer. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N 77, 16303.Google Scholar
Laprise, R. & Peltier, W. R. 1989 The linear stability of nonlinear mountain waves: implications for the understanding of severe downslope windstorms. J. Atmos. Sci. 46 (4), 545564.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1979 Mixing in stratified fluids. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 13, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1980 Mixing across a density interface produced by grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 691703.Google Scholar
Lozovatsky, I. D. & Fernando, H. J. S. 2012 Mixing efficiency in natural flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012a The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 1. Shear aligned convection, pairing, and braid instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012b The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 2. The influence of stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 4570.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2013 Shear-induced mixing in geophysical flows: does the route to turbulence matter to its efficiency?. J. Fluid Mech. 725, 216261.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496508.Google Scholar
Oglethorpe, R. L. F., Caulfield, C. P. & Woods, A. W. 2013 Spontaneous layering in stratified turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 721, R3.Google Scholar
Osborn, T. R. 1980 Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 8389.Google Scholar
Park, Y. G., Whitehead, J. A. & Gnanadeskian, A. 1994 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids: layer formation and energetics. J. Fluid Mech. 279, 279311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M. D., Caulfield, C. P., McElwaine, J. N. & Dalziel, S. B. 2006 Time-dependent mixing in stratified Kelvin–Helmholtz billows: experimental observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L15608.Google Scholar
Peltier, W. R. & Caulfield, C. P. 2003 Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 135167.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1972 Turbulence in a strongly stratified fluid: is it unstable? Deep-Sea Res. 19, 7981.Google Scholar
Posmentier, E. S. 1977 The generation of salinity fine structure by vertical diffusion. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7 (2), 298300.Google Scholar
Prastowo, T., Griffiths, R. W., Hughes, G. O. & Hogg, A. McC. 2008 Mixing efficiency in controlled exchange flows. J. Fluid Mech. 600, 235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehmann, C. R. & Koseff, J. R. 2004 Mean potential energy change in stratified grid turbulence. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 37, 271294.Google Scholar
Riley, J. J. & de Bruyn Kops, S. M. 2003 Dynamics of turbulence strongly influenced by buoyancy. Phys. Fluids 15, 20472059.Google Scholar
Shih, L. H., Koseff, J. R., Ivey, G. N. & Ferziger, J. H. 2005 Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 193214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Moum, J. N. 2000 Length scales of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 12, 13271342.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D., Moum, J. & Caldwell, D. 2001 The efficiency of mixing in turbulent patches: inferences from direct simulations and microstructure observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31, 19691992.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Peltier, W. R. 1991 Instability and transition in finite amplitude Kelvin–Helmholtz and Holmboe waves. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 387415.Google Scholar
Spedding, G. R. 1997 The evolution of initially turbulent bluff-body wakes at high internal Froude number. J. Fluid Mech. 337, 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, E. J. & Fernando, H. J. S. 2001 Entrainment and mixing in stratified shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 349386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stretch, D. D., Rottman, J. W., Venayagamoorthy, S. K., Nomura, K. K. & Rehmann, C. R. 2010 Mixing efficiency in decaying stably stratified turbulence. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 49, 2536.Google Scholar
Tang, W., Caulfield, C. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2009 A prediction for the optimal stratification for turbulent mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 634, 487497.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1968 A method of producing a shear flow in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 693704.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1973 Experiments on instability and turbulence in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 731751.Google Scholar
Wells, M., Cenedese, C. & Caulfield, C. P. 2010 The relationship between flux coefficient and entrainment ratio in density currents. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 27132727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, K. B., Lombard, P. N., Riley, J. J. & D’Asaro, E. A. 1995 Available potential energy and mixing in density-stratified fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 115128.Google Scholar
Wunsch, C. & Ferrari, R. 2004 Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 281314.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mashayek et al. supplementary movie

The XZ view of the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy for Ri=0.14. Open this file side by side movie 2.

Download Mashayek et al. supplementary movie(File)
File 7.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Mashayek et al. supplementary movie

The YZ view of the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy for Ri=0.14. Open this file side by side movie 1.

Download Mashayek et al. supplementary movie(File)
File 2.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Mashayek et al. supplementary movie

The XZ view of the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy for Ri=0.2. Open this file side by side movie 4.

Download Mashayek et al. supplementary movie(File)
File 3.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Mashayek et al. supplementary movie

The YZ view of the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy for Ri=0.2. Open this file side by side movie 3.

Download Mashayek et al. supplementary movie(File)
File 1.3 MB