Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:51:04.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secondary instability of wall-bounded shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Steven A. Orszag  and
Anthony T. Patera
Steven A. Orszag
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Anthony T. Patera
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis is given of a secondary instability that obtains in a wide class of wall-bounded parallel shear flows, including plane Poiseuille flow, plane Couette flow, flat-plate boundary layers, and pipe Poiseuille flow. In these flows it is shown that two-dimensional finite-amplitude waves are (exponentially) unstable to infinitesimal three-dimensional disturbances. This secondary instability seems to be the prototype of transitional instability in these flows in that it has the characteristic (convective) timescales observed in the typical transitions. In the case of plane Poiseuille flow, two-dimensional nonlinear equilibria and quasi-equilibria exist, and the stability of the secondary flow is determined by a three-dimensional linear eigenvalue calculation. In flows without equilibria (e.g. pipe flow), a time-dependent stability analysis is performed by direct spectral numerical calculation of the incompressible three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations.

The energetics and vorticity dynamics of the instability are discussed. It is shown that the two-dimensional wave mediates the transfer of energy from the mean flow to the three-dimensional perturbation but does not directly provide energy to the disturbance. The instability is of an inviscid character as it persists to high Reynolds numbers and grows on convective timescales. Maximum vorticity (inflexion-point) arguments predict some features of the instability like phase-locking of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional waves, but they do not explain its essential three-dimensionality. The inviscid vorticity dynamics of the instability shows that vortext-stretching and tilting effects are both required to explain the persistent exponential growth. The instability is not centrifugal in nature.

The three-dimensional instability requires that a threshold two-dimensional amplitude be achieved (about 1% of the centreline velocity in plane Poiseuille flow): the growth rates are relatively insensitive to amplitude for moderate two-dimensional amplitudes. With moderate two-dimensional amplitudes, the critical Reynolds numbers for substantial three-dimensional growth are about 1000 in plane Poiseuille and Couette flows and several thousand in pipe Poiseuille flow. The asymptotic (as R approaches infinity) growth rate in plane Poiseuille flow is approximately 0·15h/U0, where h is the half-channel width and U0 is the centreline velocity.

It is possible to make some progress identifying experimental features of transitional spot structure with aspects of the nonlinear two-dimensional/linear three-dimensional instability. The principal excitation of the eigenfunction of the three-dimensional (growing) disturbance is localized within a given periodicity length (in both the stream and cross-stream directions) near the vorticity maxima of the two-dimensional flow; its planwise structure corresponds to that of observed streaks in early transitional spots; its vortical structure resembles that of a streamwise vortex lifting off the wall. As the three-dimensional disturbance grows to finite amplitude, the flows become chaotic with statistical structure similar to that observed experimentally in moderate-Reynolds-number turbulent shear flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 128 , March 1983 , pp. 347 - 385
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benney, D. J. & Lin, C. C. 1960 On the secondary motion induced by oscillation in a shear flow Phys. Fluids 3, 656.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. & Orszag, S. A. 1983 Secondary instability of free-shear flows. (To be published.)
Brown, G. L. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1977 Large structure in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 20, S243.Google Scholar
Busse, F. H. 1969 Bounds on the transport of mass and momentum by turbulent flow between parallel plates Z. angew. Math. Phys. 20, 1.Google Scholar
Carlson, D., Widnall, S. E. & Peeters, M. F. 1981 A flow visualization study of transition in plane Poiseuille flow. Flow Dynamics Research Lab. (Dept of Aero, and Astro., M.I.T.) Rep. no. 81–3.Google Scholar
Clever, R. M. & Busse, F. H. 1974 Transition to time-dependent convection J. Fluid Mech. 65, 625.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1980 Nonlinear evolution and breakdown in unstable boundary layers J. Fluid Mech. 99, 247.Google Scholar
Davey, A. 1973 On the stability of plane Couette flow to infinitesimal disturbances J. Fluid Mech. 57, 689.Google Scholar
Davey, A. & Drazin, P. G. 1969 The stability of Poiseuille flow in a pipe J. Fluid Mech. 36, 209.Google Scholar
Davey, A. & Nguyen, H. P. F. 1971 Finite-amplitude stability of pipe flow J. Fluid Mech. 45, 701.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Ellingson, T. & Palm, E. 1975 Stability of linear flow Phys. Fluids 18, 487.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, M. 1980 The transition to aperiodic behavior in turbulent systems Commun. Math. Phys. 77, 65.Google Scholar
Gollub, J. P. & Benson, S. H. 1980 Many routes to turbulent convection J. Fluid Mech. 100, 449.Google Scholar
Gorman, M., Reith, L. A. & Swinney, H. L. 1980 Moderation patterns, multiple frequencies, and other phenomena in circular Couette flow Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 357, 10.Google Scholar
Görtler, H. & Witting, H. 1958 Theorie der sekundären Instabilität der laminaren Grent-schichten. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. Boundary Layer Research (ed. H. Görtler), p. 110. Berlin.
Grohne, D. 1969 Die Stabilität der ebenen Kanalströmung gegenüber dreidimensionalen Störungen von endlicher Amplitude. A.V.A. Göttingen Rep. 69-A-30.Google Scholar
Herbert, T. 1976 Periodic secondary motions in a plane channel. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (ed. A. I. Van de Vooren & P. J. Zandbergen). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 59, p. 235. Springer.
Herbert, T. 1977 Finite amplitude stability of plane parallel flows. AGARD Conf. Proc. CP-224, p. 3/1.
Itoh, N. 1977 Nonlinear stability of parallel flows with subcritical Reynolds numbers. Part 2. Stability of pipe Poiseuille flow to finite axisymmetric disturbances J. Fluid Mech. 82, 469.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S., Tidstrom, K. D. & Sargent, L. M. 1962 The three-dimensional nature of boundary-layer instability J. Fluid Mech. 12, 1.Google Scholar
Kleiser, L. & Schumann, U. 1983 Laminar–turbulent transition process in plane Poiseuille flow. In Proc. Symp. on Spectral Methods. SIAM.
Landahl, M. T. 1980 A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows J. Fluid Mech. 98, 243.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. 1955 The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Manneville, P. & Pomeau, Y. 1980 Different ways to turbulence in dissipative dynamic systems. Physica D1, 219.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, J. B. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Transition from periodic to chaotic thermal convection J. Fluid Mech. 122, 123.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, R. W. & Orszag, S. A. 1973 Numerical calculation of the linear stability of pipe flows. Flow Research Rep. no. 25, Kent, Washington.Google Scholar
Nishioka, M., Iida, S. & Ichikawa, Y. 1975 An experimental investigation of the stability of plane Poiseuille flow J. Fluid Mech. 72, 731.Google Scholar
Nishioka, M., Iida, S. & Kanbayashi, S. 1978 An experimental investigation of the subcritical instability in plane Poiseuille flow. In Proc. 10th Turbulence Symp. Inst. Space Aero. Sci., Tokyo Univ., p. 55.
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation J. Fluid Mech. 50, 689.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1976 Turbulence and transition: a progress report. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (ed. A. van de Vooren & P. J. Zandbergen). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 59, p. 32.
Orszag, S. A. & Kells, L. C. 1980 Transition to turbulence in plane Poiseuille flow and plane Couette flow J. Fluid Mech. 96, 159.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. & Patera, A. T. 1980 Subcritical transition to turbulence in plane channel flows Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 989.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. & Patera, A. T. 1981a Subcritical transition to turbulence in planar shear flows. In Transition and Turbulence (ed. R. E. Meyer), p. 127. Academic.
Orszag, S. A. & Patera, A. T. 1981b Calculation of von Kármán's constant for turbulent channel flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 832.Google Scholar
Patera, A. T. & Orszag, S. A. 1981 Finite-amplitude stability of axisymmetric pipe flow J. Fluid Mech. 112, 467.Google Scholar
Pfenniger, W. 1961 Boundary Layers and Flow Control, vol. 2 (ed. C. V. Leschmann), p. 190. Pergamon.
Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1982 The two- and three-dimensional instabilities of a spatially periodic shear layer J. Fluid Mech. 114, 59.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, S. & Antonia, R. A. 1979 Some properties of the large structure in a fully developed turbulent duct flow Phys. Fluids 22, 614.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D. & Takens, F. 1971 On the nature of turbulence Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167.Google Scholar
Salwen, H., Cotton, F. W. & Grosch, C. E. 1980 Linear stability of Poiseuille flow in a circular pipe J. Fluid Mech. 98, 273.Google Scholar
Squires, H. B. 1933 On the stability of the three-dimensional disturbances of viscous flow between parallel walls. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 142, 621.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1960 On the non-linear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows. Part 1. The basic behaviour in plane Poiseuille flow J. Fluid Mech. 9, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1965 The production of intense shear layers by vortex stretching and convection. AGARD Rep. 514.Google Scholar
Wray, A. & Hussaini, M. Y. H. 1980 Numerical experiments in boundary layer stability. AIAA Paper 80–0275.