Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:47:14.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secondary flow and turbulence in a cone-and-plate device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

H. P. Sdougos ,
S. R. Bussolari  and
C. F. Dewey
H. P. Sdougos
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
S. R. Bussolari
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
C. F. Dewey
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flow between a shallow rotating cone and a stationary plate has been investigated using flow visualization, hot-film heat-transfer probes, and measurements of the torque required to rotate the cone against the retardation of the viscous fluid that fills the device. Theory appropriate to these experiments is also presented.

An expansion of the Navier–Stokes equations is performed for small values of the single parameter $\tilde{R} = r^2\omega\alpha^2/12\nu $. (Here r is the local radius, ω the angular velocity of the cone, α([Lt ] 1) is the angle between the cone and plate, and v is the fluid kinematic viscosity.) The measurements at low rotational speeds describe a simple linear velocity profile as predicted for the laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid. At larger rotational speeds, strong secondary flows are observed. There is agreement between the laminar theory and the measured streamline angles and shear stresses for values of $\tilde{R} < 0.5$. Turbulence is observed for $\tilde{R} \gtrsim 4$.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 138 , January 1984 , pp. 379 - 404
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bussolari, S. R., Dewey, C. F. & Gimbrone, M. A. 1982 An apparatus for subjecting living cells to fluid shear stress Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 1851–1854.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. J. 1981 Organized motion in turbulent flow Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457–515.Google Scholar
Cheng, D. C.-H. 1968 The effect of secondary flow on the viscosity measurement using a cone-and-plate viscometer Chem. Engng Sci. 23, 895–899.Google Scholar
Coleman, B. D., Markovitz, H. & Noll, W. 1966 Viscometric Flows of Non-Newtonian Fluids. Springer.
Coles, D. E. & VAN ATTA, C. W. 1967 Digital experiment in spiral turbulence Phys. Fluids Suppl. 10, SII20–SII21.Google Scholar
Cox, D. B. 1962 Radial flow in the cone–plate viscometer Nature 193, 670.Google Scholar
Dewey, C. F., Bussolari, S. R., Gimbrone, M. A. & Davies, P. F. 1981 The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. Trans. ASME K: J. Biomech. Engng 103, 177–185.
Fewell, M. E. 1974 The secondary flow of Newtonian fluids in cone-and-plate viscometers. Ph.D. thesis, Rice University.
Fewell, M. E. & Hellums, J. D. 1977 The secondary flow of Newtonian fluids in cone-and-plate viscometers Trans. Soc. Rheol. 21, 535–565.Google Scholar
Heuser, G. & Krause, E. 1979 The flow field of Newtonian fluids in cone and plate viscometers with small gap angles Rheol. Acta 18, 553–564.Google Scholar
King, M. J. & Waters, N. D. 1970 The effect of secondary flows in the use of a rheogoniometer Rheol. Acta 9, 164–170.Google Scholar
Lévéque, M. A. 1928 Transmission de chaleur par convection Ann. des Mines 13, 201–299.Google Scholar
Miller, C. E. & Hoppmann, W. H. 1963 Velocity field induced in a liquid by a rotating cone. In Proc. 4th Intl Congr. on Rheology, Part 2, pp. 619–635. Interscience.
Mooney, M. & Ewart, R. H. 1934 The conicylindrical viscometer Physics 5, 350–354.Google Scholar
Narasimha, R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1973 Relaminarization in highly accelerated turbulent boundary layers J. Fluid Mech. 61, 417–447.Google Scholar
Pelech, I. & Shapiro, A. H. 1964 Flexible disk rotating on a gas film next to a wall. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 31, 577–584.
Savins, J. G. & Metzner, A. B. 1970 Radial (secondary) flows in rheogoniometric devices Rheol. Acta 9, 365–373.Google Scholar
Slattery, J. C. 1961 Analysis of the cone–plate viscometer J. Coll. Sci. 16, 431–437.Google Scholar
Turian, R. M. 1972 Perturbation solution of the steady Newtonian flow in the cone and plate and parallel plate systems Ind. Engng Chem. Fundam. 11, 361–368.Google Scholar
Walters, K. 1975 Rheometry. Wiley.
Walters, K. & Waters, N. D. 1966 Polymer systems, deformation and flow. In Proc. Brit. Soc. Rheol. (ed. R. E. Wetton & R. W. Whorlow). Macmillan.
Wygnanski, I. J. & Champagne, F. H. 1973 On transition in a pipe. Part 1. The origin of puffs and slugs and the flow in a turbulent slug J. Fluid Mech. 59, 281–335.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I., Sokolov, M. & Friedman, D. 1975 On transition in a pipe. Part 2. The equilibrium puff. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 283, 304.