Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T02:50:58.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of a turbulent boundary layer to sinusoidal free-stream unsteadiness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

G. J. Brereton
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
W. C. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
R. Jayaraman
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Present address: IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, New York.

Abstract

In this paper, selected findings of a detailed experimental investigation are reported concerning the effects of forced free-stream unsteadiness on a turbulent boundary layer. The forced unsteadiness was sinusoidal and was superimposed locally on an otherwise-steady mainstream, beyond a turbulent boundary layer which had developed under constant-pressure conditions. Within the region over which free-stream unsteadiness was induced, the sinusoidal variation in pressure gradient was between extremes of zero and a positive value, with a positive average level. The local response of the boundary layer to these free-stream effects was studied through simultaneous measurements of the u- and v-components of the velocity field

Although extensive studies of unsteady, turbulent, fully-developed pipe and channel flow have been carried out, the problem of a developing turbulent boundary layer and its response to forced free-stream unsteadiness has received comparatively little attention. The present study is intended to redress this imbalance and, when contrasted with other studies of unsteady turbulent boundary layers, is unique in that: (i) it features an appreciable amplitude of mainstream modulation at a large number of frequencies of forced unsteadiness, (ii) its measurements are both detailed and of high spatial resolution, so that the near-wall behaviour of the flow can be discerned, and (iii) it allows local modulation of the mainstream beyond a turbulent boundary layer which has developed under the well-known conditions of steady, two-dimensional, constant-pressure flow

Results are reported which allow comparison of the behaviour of boundary layers under the same mean external conditions, but with different time dependence in their free-stream velocities. These time dependences correspond to: (i) steady flow, (ii) quasi-steadily varying flow, and (iii) unsteady flow at different frequencies of mainstream unsteadiness. Experimental results focus upon the time-averaged nature of the flow; they indicate that the mean structure of the turbulent boundary layer is sufficiently robust that the imposition of free-stream unsteadiness results only in minor differences relative to the mean character of the steady flow, even at frequencies for which the momentary condition of the flow departs substantially from its quasi-steady state. Mean levels of turbulence production are likewise unaffected by free-stream unsteadiness and temporal production of turbulence appears to result only from modulation of the motions which contribute to turbulence production as a time-averaged measure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, M. & Reynolds, W. C., 1975 Measurements and predictions of a fully developed turbulent channel flow with imposed controlled oscillations. Report TF -8, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Andersen, P. S., Kays, W. M. & Moffat, R. J., 1975 Experimental results for the transpired turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 353375.Google Scholar
Binder, G., Tardu, S., Blackwelder, R. F. & Kueny, J. L., 1985 Large amplitude periodic oscillations in the wall region of a turbulent channel flow. Proc. Fifth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 16.116.7. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Blondeaux, P. & Colombini, M., 1985 Pulsatile turbulent pipe flow. Proc. Fifth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 16.1516.21. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Brereton, G. J.: 1989 Deduction of skin friction by Clauser technique in unsteady turbulent boundary layers. Exp. Fluids 7, 422424.Google Scholar
Brereton, G. J. & Reynolds, W. C., 1987 Experimental study of the fluid mechanics of unsteady turbulent boundary layers. Report TF -29, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Cebeci, T.: 1977 Calculation of unsteady two-dimensional laminar and turbulent boundary layers with fluctuations in external velocity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 335, 225238.Google Scholar
Charnay, G., Mathieu, J. & Comte-Bellot, G. 1976 Response of a turbulent boundary layer to random fluctuations in the external stream. Phys. Fluids 19, 12611272.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E.: 1968 The young person's guide to the data. Proc. Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers -1968 AFOSR-IFP-Stanford conference, vol. 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Cousteix, J. & Houdeville, R., 1983 Couches limites instationnaires. Rapport Technique 53/2259 and, Department d'Etudes et de Recherches en Aerothermodynamique, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 241258.Google Scholar
Jayaraman, R., Parikh, P. & Reynolds, W. C., 1982 An experimental study of the dynamics of an unsteady turbulent boundary layer. Report TF -18, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Karlsson, S. K. F.: 1959 An unsteady turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 622636.Google Scholar
Kebede, W., Launder, B. E. & Younis, B. A., 1985 Large-amplitude periodic pipe flow: a second-moment closure study. Proc. Fifth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 16.2316.29. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Kenison, R. C.: 1977 An experimental study of the effect of oscillatory flow on the separation region in a turbulent boundary layer. AGARD Conf. Proc. 277 20.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W., 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741773.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J.: 1954 The response of laminar skin friction and heat transfer to fluctuations in the stream velocity. Proc R. Soc. Lond. A 224, 123.Google Scholar
Luchik, T. S. & Tiederman, W. G., 1987 Timescale and structure of ejections and bursts in turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 529552.Google Scholar
Maruyama, S. & Tanaka, T., 1987 The effect of spatial restriction on the inner-layer structure of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 485500.Google Scholar
Mizushina, T., Maruyama, T. & Hirasawa, H., 1975 Structure of the turbulence in pulsating pipe flows. J. Chem. Engng Japan 8, 210216.Google Scholar
Mizushina, T., Maruyama, T. & Shiozaki, Y., 1973 Pulsating turbulent flow in a tube. J. Chem. Engng Japan 6, 487494.Google Scholar
Patel, M. H.: 1975 On laminar boundary layers in oscillatory flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 347, 99123.Google Scholar
Patel, M. H.: 1977 On turbulent boundary layers in oscillatory flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 353, 121144.Google Scholar
Ramaprian, B. R. & Tu, S. W., 1983 Fully developed periodic turbulent pipe flow. Part 2. The detailed structure of the flow. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 5981.Google Scholar
Rao, K. N., Narasimha, R. & Narayanan, M. A. Badri 1971 The ‘bursting’ phenomenon in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 339352.Google Scholar
Schachenmann, A. A. & Rockwell, D. O., 1976 Oscillating turbulent flow in a conical diffuser. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 98, 695701.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Shivaprasad, B. G. & Chew, Y. T., 1983 The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 4. Effects of periodic free-stream unsteadiness. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 219261.Google Scholar
Tardu, S., Binder, G. & Blackwelder, R., 1987 Modulation of bursting by periodic oscillations imposed on channel flow. Proc. Sixth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 4.5.14.5.6. Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse.
Tu, S. W. & Ramaprian, B. R., 1983 Fully developed periodic turbulent pipe flow. Part 1. Main experimental results and comparison with predictions. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 3158.Google Scholar