Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T12:09:41.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconfiguration of elastic blades in oscillatory flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2018

Tristan Leclercq*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, LadHyX, CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
Emmanuel de Langre
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, LadHyX, CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
*
Email address for correspondence: tristan.leclercq@polytechnique.edu

Abstract

When subjected to a steady cross-flow, the deformation of flexible blades is known to result in the alleviation of the internal stresses in comparison to rigid structures. In the field of biomechanics, the flow-induced deformations of flexible structures leading to stress reduction have been often referred to as ‘reconfiguration’ in order to highlight the alleged benefits of such an adaptive process. In this paper, we investigate the reconfiguration of thin elastic blades and the resulting internal stresses when the flow about the blade is oscillatory. Our approach, based on numerical simulations using reduced order fluid force models, is validated by experimental observations. Through a systematic investigation of the response of the structure, we identify four kinematic regimes depending on the excursion of the fluid particles relative to the dimensions of the blade and on the frequency of the flow oscillations relative to the characteristic frequency of the blade. When the flow amplitude is smaller than the structural width, fluid inertia dominates over drag and the fluid–structure coupling triggers resonances that may cause a magnification of the internal stresses. But the small magnitude of the fluid load in this regime is unlikely to cause any severe damage in practice. Otherwise, when drag is the dominant load, flexibility always permits a reduction of the internal stresses. As in the static case, dynamic reconfiguration results in the concentration of the stresses within a small bending length whose scaling depends on the kinematic regime. The magnitude of the stresses does not depend on the actual length of the structure anymore, which suggests the absence of mechanical limitations to the axial growth of wave-swept plants. However, the risk of resonances originating from the inertial load when the blade width compares with the flow excursion favours elongated shapes that best accommodate the oscillatory fluid loadings.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alben, S. 2008 Optimal flexibility of a flapping appendage in an inviscid fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 355380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alben, S., Shelley, M. & Zhang, J. 2002 Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420 (6915), 479481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alben, S., Shelley, M. & Zhang, J. 2004 How flexibility induces streamlining in a two-dimensional flow. Phys. Fluids 16 (5), 16941713.Google Scholar
Arellano Castro, R. F., Guillamot, L., Cros, A. & Eloy, C. 2014 Non-linear effects on the resonant frequencies of a cantilevered plate. J. Fluids Struct. 46, 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audoly, B. & Pomeau, Y. 2010 Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-Linear Response of Shells. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. D. 1990 Flow-Induced Vibration. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Broyden, C. G. 1965 A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations. Math. Comput. 19 (92), 577593.Google Scholar
Candelier, F., Boyer, F. & Leroyer, A. 2011 Three-dimensional extension of Lighthill’s large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. J. Fluid Mech. 674, 196226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. K. 2002 The Theory and Practice of Hydrodynamics and Vibration. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M. W. 1999 Are there mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms? J. Expl Biol. 202 (23), 34633467.Google Scholar
Denny, M. W. & Cowen, B. 1997 Flow and flexibility. II. The roles of size and shape in determining wave forces on the bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana. J. Expl Biol. 200 (24), 31653183.Google Scholar
Denny, M. W., Daniel, T. L. & Koehl, M. A. R. 1985 Mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms. Ecol. Monographs 55 (1), 69102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eloy, C., Kofman, N. & Schouveiler, L. 2012 The origin of hysteresis in the flag instability. J. Fluid Mech. 691, 583593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, M. T. & Denny, M. W. 1995 Surviving hydrodynamic forces in a wave-swept environment: consequences of morphology in the feather boa kelp, Egregia menziesii (Turner). J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecology 190 (1), 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaylord, B., Blanchette, C. A. & Denny, M. W. 1994 Mechanical consequences of size in wave-swept algae. Ecol. Monographs 64 (3), 287313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaylord, B. & Denny, M. W. 1997 Flow and flexibility. I. Effects of size, shape and stiffness in determining wave forces on the stipitate kelps Eisenia arborea and Pterygophora californica. J. Expl Biol. 200 (24), 31413164.Google Scholar
Gosselin, F., de Langre, E. & Machado-Almeida, B. A. 2010 Drag reduction of flexible plates by reconfiguration. J. Fluid Mech. 650, 319341.Google Scholar
Harder, D. L., Speck, O., Hurd, C. L. & Speck, T. 2004 Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23 (2), 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassani, M., Mureithi, N. W. & Gosselin, F. 2016 Large coupled bending and torsional deformation of an elastic rod subjected to fluid flow. J. Fluids Struct. 62, 367383.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Weihs, D. 1978 Hydrodynamic propulsion by large amplitude oscillation of an airfoil with chordwise flexibility. J. Fluid Mech. 88 (3), 485497.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Weihs, D. 1979 Large amplitude unsteady motion of a flexible slender propulsor. J. Fluid Mech. 90 (4), 713723.Google Scholar
Keulegan, G. H. & Carpenter, L. H. 1958 Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. 60 (5), 423440.Google Scholar
Koehl, M. A. R. 1984 How do benthic organisms withstand moving water? Am. Zool. 24 (1), 5770.Google Scholar
de Langre, E. 2008 Effects of wind on plants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 141168.Google Scholar
de Langre, E., Gutierrez, A. & Cossé, J. 2012 On the scaling of drag reduction by reconfiguration in plants. C. R. Méc 340 (1), 3540.Google Scholar
Leclercq, T. & de Langre, E. 2016 Drag reduction by elastic reconfiguration of non-uniform beams in non-uniform flows. J. Fluids Struct. 60, 114129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1960 Note on the swimming of slender fish. J. Fluid Mech. 9 (2), 305317.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1971 Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 179 (1055), 125138.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Xiao, Q. & Cheng, F. 2013 A bio-inspired study on tidal energy extraction with flexible flapping wings. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 8 (3), 036011.Google Scholar
Luhar, M., Infantes, E. & Nepf, H. M. 2017 Seagrass blade motion under waves and its impact on wave decay. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 37363752.Google Scholar
Luhar, M. & Nepf, H. M. 2011 Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56 (6), 20032017.Google Scholar
Luhar, M. & Nepf, H. M. 2016 Wave-induced dynamics of flexible blades. J. Fluids Struct. 61, 2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelin, S. & Doaré, O. 2013 Energy harvesting efficiency of piezoelectric flags in axial flows. J. Fluid Mech. 714, 489504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelin, S. & Llewellyn Smith, S. G. 2009 Resonance and propulsion performance of a heaving flexible wing. Phys. Fluids 21 (7), 071902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullarney, J. C. & Henderson, S. M. 2010 Wave-forced motion of submerged single-stem vegetation. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C12061.Google Scholar
Paraz, F., Eloy, C. & Schouveiler, L. 2014 Experimental study of the response of a flexible plate to a harmonic forcing in a flow. C. R. Méc 342 (9), 532538.Google Scholar
Paraz, F., Schouveiler, L. & Eloy, C. 2016 Thrust generation by a heaving flexible foil: resonance, nonlinearities, and optimality. Phys. Fluids 28 (1), 011903.Google Scholar
Piñeirua, M., Thiria, B. & Godoy-Diana, R. 2017 Modelling of an actuated elastic swimmer. J. Fluid Mech. 829, 731750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramananarivo, S., Godoy-Diana, R. & Thiria, B. 2011 Rather than resonance, flapping wing flyers may play on aerodynamics to improve performance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 (15), 59645969.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Michelin, S. & de Langre, E. 2012 The effect of non-uniform damping on flutter in axial flow and energy-harvesting strategies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 468 (2147), 36203635.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1952 Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 214 (1117), 158183.Google Scholar
Tickner, E. G. & Sacks, A. H. 1969 Engineering simulation of the viscous behavior of whole blood using suspensions of flexible particles. Circulat. Res. 25 (4), 389400.Google Scholar
Utter, B. & Denny, M. W. 1996 Wave-induced forces on the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Agardh): field test of a computational model. J. Expl Biol. 199 (12), 26452654.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1984 Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am. Zool. 24 (1), 3744.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1989 Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds. J. Expl Bot. 40 (8), 941948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W. J., Timoshenko, S. P. & Young, D. H. 1990 Vibration Problems in Engineering. Wiley.Google Scholar