Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:06:55.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pathological oscillations of a rotating fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

K. Stewartson
Affiliation:
University College London
J. A. Rickard
Affiliation:
University College London

Abstract

A theoretical study is made of the free periods of oscillation of an incompressible inviscid fluid, bounded by two rigid concentric spheres of radii a, b (a > b), and rotating with angular velocity Ω about a common diameter. An attempt is made to use the Longuet-Higgins solution of the Laplace tidal equation as the first term of an expansion in powers of the parameter ε = (ab)/(a + b), of the solution to the full equations governing oscillations in a spherical shell. This leads to a singularity in the second-order terms at the two critical circles where the characteristic cones of the governing equation touch the shell boundaries.

A boundary-layer type of argument is used to examine the apparent non-uniformity in the neighbourhood of these critical circles, and it is found that, in order to remove the singularity in the pressure, an integrable singularity in the velocity components must be introduced on the characteristic cone which touches the inner spherical boundary. Further integrable singularities are introduced by repeated reflexion at the shell boundaries, and so, even outside the critical region the velocity terms contain what may reasonably be described as a pathological term, generally of order ε½ compared to that found by Longuet-Higgins, periodic with wavelength Oa) in the radial and latitudinal directions.

Some consequences of this result are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenhill, A. G. 1880 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 4, 4.
Greenspan, H. P. 1964 J. Fluid Mech. 20, 673.
Greenspan, H. P. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 22, 449.
Greenspan, H. P. & Howard, L. N. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 17, 325.
Haurwitz, B. 1940 J. Mar. Res. 3, 254.
Hough, S. S. 1898 Phil. Trans. A, 186, 297.
Lord, Kelvin 1877 Nature, Lond. 15, 297.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1964 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 279, 446.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1965 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 284, 40.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1968 Phil. Trans. A, 262, 511.
Malkus, W. V. R. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 28, 793.
Roberts, P. H. & Stewartson, K. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 17, 1.
Rumiantsev, V. V. 1964 Adv. Appl. Mech. 8. London: Academic Press.
Stern, M. E. 1963 Tellus, 15, 246.
Stewartson, K. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 577.
Stewartson, K. 1967 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 299, 173.
Whittaker, E. T. & Watson, G. N. 1927 A Course of Modern Analysis, Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.