Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:02:07.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On turbulent spots in a laminar boundary layer subjected to a self-similar adverse pressure gradient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Avi Seifert  and
Israel J. Wygnanski
Avi Seifert
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel
Israel J. Wygnanski
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The characteristics of a turbulent spot propagating in a laminar boundary layer subjected to a self-similar adverse pressure gradient (defined by a Falkner–Skan parameter β = -0.1) were investigated experimentally. It was observed that some small differences in the normalized shape of the undisturbed velocity profile caused by the pressure gradient had a major influence on the spreading rate of the spot at comparable Reδ*. The rate of spread of the spot in the spanwise direction was affected most dramatically by the pressure gradient where the average angle at which the tips of the spots moved outward relative to the plane of symmetry was 21°. It was noted that the strength and duration of the disturbance initiating the spots had an effect on their spanwise rate of spread. For example, a strong impulsive disturbance and a disturbance caused by a stationary three-dimensional roughness generated spots which spread at a much smaller rate. The interaction of the spot with the wave packet existing beyond its tip was enhanced by the adverse pressure gradient because the Reynolds number of the surrounding boundary layer was everywhere supercritical. Thus, the maximum linear amplification rate in this case is approximately four times larger than in Blasius flow. Some features of the breakdown and their relationship to the shape and the perturbation velocities in the spot are discussed. The normalized length of the calmed region relative to the length of the spot is enhanced by the adverse pressure gradient and by an increase in the intensity of the disturbance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 296 , 10 August 1995 , pp. 185 - 209
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cantwell, B., Coles, D. & Dimotakis, P. 1978 Structure and entrainment in the plane of symmetry of a turbulent spot. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 641.Google Scholar
Chambers, F. W. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1983 Turbulent spots, wave packets and growth. Phys. Fluids 26, 1160.Google Scholar
Emmons, H. W. 1951 The laminar turbulent transition in a boundary layer-part I. J. Aero. Sci. 18, 490.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M., Blackwelder, R. F. & Riley, J. J. 1981 On the growth of turbulent regions in laminar boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 73.Google Scholar
Glezer, A., Katz, Y. & Wygnanski, I. 1989 On the breakdown of the wave packet trailing a turbulent spot in a laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 1.Google Scholar
Gostelow, J. P. 1993 Some scenarios for transition on turbomachinery blading. Paper Presented at the End stage transition Conf., Syracuse University.
Gostelow, J. P., Hong, G., Melwani, N. & Walker, G. J. 1993 Turbulent spot development under a moderate pressure gradient. ASME Paper 93-GT-377.
Katz, Y., Seifert, A. & Wygnanski, I. 1990 On the evolution of a turbulent spot in a laminar boundary layer in favorable pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 221, 1.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S., Tidstrom, K. D. & Sargent, L. M. 1962 The 3D nature of boundary layer instability. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 1.Google Scholar
Kovasznay, L. S., Komoda, H. & Vasudeva, B. R. 1962 Detailed flow field in transition. In Proc. 1962 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mech. Inst., Palo Alto, CA, p 1. Stanford University Press.
Morkovin, M. V. 1969 On the many faces of transition. In Viscous Drag Reduction (ed. C. S. Wells), p. 1. Plenum.
Narasimha, R. 1985 The laminar turbulent transition zone in the boundary layer. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 22, 29.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S. 1994 Görtler vortices. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 379.Google Scholar
Schubauer, G. B. & Klebanoff, P. S. 1956 Contributions to the mechanics of boundary layer transition. NACA Rep. 1289.
Seifert, A. 1990 On the interaction of low amplitude disturbances emanating from discrete points in a Blasius boundary layer. PhD thesis, Tel-Aviv University.
Seifert, A. 1995 To be published.
Seifert, A., Zilberman, M. & Wygnanski, I. 1994 On the simultaneous measurements of two velocity components in the turbulent spot. J. Engng Maths 28, 43.Google Scholar
Wazzan, A. R., Okamora, T. T. & Smith, A. M. O. 1968 Spatial and temporal stability charts for the Falkner-Skan velocity profiles. McDonnel Douglas Corp. Rep. DAC 67086.
Wygnanski, I. 1981 The effects of Reynolds number and pressure gradients on the transitional spot in a laminar boundary layer. In Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 136, p. 304. Springer.
Wygnanski, I. 1983 On turbulent spots. In Proc. the 7th Biennial Symp. on Turbulence, Rolla, Missouri (ed. G. K. Patterson & J. L. Zakin) p. 390.
Wygnanski, I., Haritonidis, J. H. & Kaplan, R. E. 1979 On a Tollmien—Schlichting wave packet produced by a turbulent spot. J. Fluid Mech. 92, 505.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. J., Sokolov, M. & Friedman, D. 1975 On transition in a pipe. Part 2. The equilibrium puff. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 283.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I., Sokolov, M. & Friedman, D. 1976 On a turbulent spot in a laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 785.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I., Zilberman, M. & Haritonidis, J. H. 1982 On the spreading of a turbulent spot in the absence of a pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 69.Google Scholar