Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T11:38:13.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the question of the preferred mode in cellular thermal convection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

L. A. Segel  and
J. T. Stuart
L. A. Segel
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York
J. T. Stuart
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper modifies and refines earlier work of Palm (1960) concerning the finiteamplitude steady state of cellular convective motion attained when a horizontal layer of fluid becomes unstable as a result of being heated from below. The two non-linear ordinary differential equations to which the problem was reduced by Palm (under certain conditions) are given in a corrected form, and are then analysed in some detail. The principal conclusions are that, for the model considered, hexagonal convection cell may be the stable equilibrium state only if the variation of kinematic viscosity with temperature is sufficiently great. Under the same circumstances a two-dimensional roll cell is also possible, the initial conditions determining which state actually occurs. Although further work is indicated, it seems probable that in an actual experiment with sufficiently large kinematic-viscosity variation, the hexagonal cells are more likely to appear. The analysis enables conclusions to be drawn concerning the flow direction at the cell centre, and also shows that a disturbance of sufficient magnitude may grow even though the situation is a stable one by linearized theory. Comparison with experiment is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1962 , pp. 289 - 306
Copyright
© 1962 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andronow, A. A. & Chaikin, C. E. 1949 Theory of Oscillations. Princeton University Press.
Chandra, K. 1938 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 164, 231–42.
de Graaf, J. G. A. & van der Held, E. F. M. 1953 Appl. Sci. Res. A, 3, 393–409.
Gorkov, L. P. 1957 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 402–7. Also Sov. Phys. JETP, 6, 311-15 (1958).
Graham, A. 1933 Phil. Trans. A, 232, 285–96.
Malkus, W. V. R. & Veronis, G. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 4, 225–60.
Palm, E. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 8, 183–92.
Rayleigh, Lord 1916 Scientific Papers, 6, 432–46.
Segel, L. A. 1962 To be published.
Spangenberg, W. G. & Rowland, W. R. 1961 Phys. Fluids, 4, 743–50.
Stoker, J. J. 1950 Nonlinear Vibrations. New York: Interscience.
Stuart, J. T. 1960a J. Fluid Mech. 9, 353–70.
Stuart, J. T. 1960b Proc. Xth Int. Cong. Appl. Mech., Stresa.
Sutton, O. G. 1950 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 204, 297–311.
Tippelskirch, H. von 1956 Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 29, 37–54.
Watson, J. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 9, 371–89.