Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:05:54.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the irreversibility of internal-wave dynamics due to wave trapping by mean flow inhomogeneities. Part 1. Local analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Sergei I. Badulin
Affiliation:
P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasikova 23, Moscow, 117218, Russia
Victor I. Shrira
Affiliation:
P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasikova 23, Moscow, 117218, Russia

Abstract

The propagation of guided internal waves on non-uniform large-scale flows of arbitrary geometry is studied within the framework of linear inviscid theory in the WKB-approximation. Our study is based on a set of Hamiltonian ray equations, with the Hamiltonian being determined from the Taylor-Goldstein boundary-value problem for a stratified shear flow. Attention is focused on the fundamental fact that the generic smooth non-uniformities of the large-scale flow result in specific singularities of the Hamiltonian. Interpreting wave packets as particles with momenta equal to their wave vectors moving in a certain force field, one can consider these singularities as infinitely deep potential holes acting quite similarly to the ‘black holes’ of astrophysics. It is shown that the particles fall for infinitely long time, each into its own ‘black hole‘. In terms of a particular wave packet this falling implies infinite growth with time of the wavenumber and the amplitude, as well as wave motion focusing at a certain depth. For internal-wave-field dynamics this provides a robust mechanism of a very specific conservative and moreover Hamiltonian irreversibility.

This phenomenon was previously studied for the simplest model of the flow non-uniformity, parallel shear flow (Badulin, Shrira & Tsimring 1985), where the term ‘trapping’ for it was introduced and the basic features were established. In the present paper we study the case of arbitrary flow geometry. Our main conclusion is that although the wave dynamics in the general case is incomparably more complicated, the phenomenon persists and retains its most fundamental features. Qualitatively new features appear as well, namely, the possibility of three-dimensional wave focusing and of ‘non-dispersive’ focusing. In terms of the particle analogy, the latter means that a certain group of particles fall into the same hole.

These results indicate a robust tendency of the wave field towards an irreversible transformation into small spatial scales, due to the presence of large-scale flows and towards considerable wave energy concentration in narrow spatial zones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (eds) 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. US Govt. Printing Office.
Badulin, S. I. & Shrira, V. I. 1985 The trapping of internal waves by horizontally inhomogeneous currents of arbitrary geometry. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 21, 982992.Google Scholar
Badulin, S. I. & Shrira, V. I. 1993 On the irreversibility of inertial-wave dynamics due to wave trapping by mean flow inhomogeneities. Part 2.
Badulin, S. I., Shrira, V. I. & Tsimring, L. Sh. 1985 The trapping and vertical focusing of internal waves in a pycnocline due to the horizontal inhomogeneities of density and currents. J. Fluid Mech. 158 199–218 (referred to herein as BST2).Google Scholar
Badulin, S. I., Tsimring, L. Sh. & Shrira, V. I. 1983 On the trapping and vertical focusing of internal waves in a pycnocline due to the horizontal inhomogeneities of stratification and current. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 273 459–463 (referred to herein as BST1).Google Scholar
Badulin, S. I., Vasilenko, V. M. & Golenko, N. N. 1990 Transformation of internal waves in the equatorial Lomonosov current. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 26, 279289.Google Scholar
Basovich, A. Ya. & Tsimring, L. Sh. 1984 Internal waves in horizontally inhomogeneous flows. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 233249.Google Scholar
Briscoe, M. G. 1975 Introduction to collection of papers on oceanic internal waves. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 289290.Google Scholar
Booker, J. R. & Bretherton, F. P. 1967 The critical layer for internal gravity waves in a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 513539.Google Scholar
Borovikov, V. A. 1988 Critical layer formation in a stratified fluid with mean currents. Reprint N309. Instut Problem Mehaniki AN SSSR, Moscow 58p (in Russian).
Borovikov, V. A. & Levchenko, E. S. 1987 The Green's functions of the internal wave equation in the layer of stratified fluid with average shear flows. Morsk. Gidrofiz. J. 1, 2432.Google Scholar
Broutman, D. 1986 On internal wave caustics. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 16, 16251635.Google Scholar
Broutman, D. & Grimshaw, R. 1988 The energetics of the interaction between short small-amplitude internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 93106.Google Scholar
Bunimovich, L. A. & Zhmur, V. V. 1986 Internal waves scattering in a horizontally inhomogeneous ocean. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 286, 197200.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. 1989 The stability of unbounded two- and three-dimensional flows subject to body forces: some exact solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 275292.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. & Criminale, W. O. 1986 Evolution of wave-like disturbances in shear flows: A class of exact solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 406, 1326.Google Scholar
Erokhin, N. S. & Sagdeev, R. Z. 1985a On the theory of anomalous focusing of internal waves in a two-dimensional nonuniform fluid. Part 1. A stationary problem. Morsk. Gidrofiz. J. 2, 1527.Google Scholar
Erokhin, N. S. & Sagdeev, R. Z. 1985b On the theory of anomalous focusing of internal waves in a horizontally inhomogeneous fluid. Part 2. Precise solution of the two-dimensional problem with regard to viscosity nonstationarity. Morsk. Gidrofiz. J. 4, 310.Google Scholar
Jones, W. L. 1969 Ray tracing for internal gravity waves. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 20282033.Google Scholar
Leblond, P. H. & Mysak, L. A. 1979 Waves in the Ocean. Elsevier.
Levine, M. D. 1983 Internal waves in the ocean: a review. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 21, 12061216.Google Scholar
McComas, C. H. & Bretherton, F. D. 1977 Resonant interactions of the oceanic internal wave field. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7, 836845.Google Scholar
McComas, C. H. & Müller, P. 1981 The dynamic balance of internal waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 11, 970986.Google Scholar
Miropolsky, Yu. Z. 1981 Dynamics of Internal Gravity Waves in the Ocean. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat.
Olbers, D. 1981 The propagation of internal waves in a geostrophic current. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 11, 12241230.Google Scholar
Olbers, D. J. 1983 Models of the oceanic internal wave field. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 21, 15671606.Google Scholar
Raevsky, M. A. 1983 On the propagation of gravity waves in randomly inhomogeneous currents. Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR. Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 19, 639645.Google Scholar
Voronovich, A. G. 1976 The propagation of surface and internal gravity waves in the geometric optics approach. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 12, 850857.Google Scholar
Watson, K. M. 1985 Interaction between internal waves and mesoscale flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 12961311.Google Scholar