Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:21:20.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the direction of the re-entrant jet and the limiting cavity flow configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2022

Dmitri V. Maklakov Open the ORCID record for Dmitri V. Maklakov [Opens in a new window]  and
Anna I. Lexina
Dmitri V. Maklakov*
Affiliation:
N.I. Lobachevsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia
Anna I. Lexina
Affiliation:
N.I. Lobachevsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia
*
†Email address for correspondence: dmaklak@kpfu.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate an old classical free streamline problem, namely, the two-dimensional re-entrant jet cavity flow past an obstacle. It is well known that for the re-entrant jet model, the direction of the jet is a free parameter that can be specified arbitrarily. To fix this uncertainty, we make a complementary conjecture: the direction should be chosen so that the mean kinetic energy of the remote part of the jet is minimal. Considering cavity flows over an oblique flat plate as an example, we show numerically that the direction is almost opposite to the incident flow. In addition, we present an analytical confirmation of this conclusion that is independent of the obstacle shape. Further, considering again the oblique flat plate as an example, we give an answer to the following question: What happens when the angle of attack tends to zero and the cavity number is finite? We demonstrate that for the limiting configurations, the re-entrant jet vanishes, and the limit is a free-surface flow with a symmetric bubble above the plate and two stagnation points on the lower side of the plate. For this limit we construct a simple exact analytical solution.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Cavitation Wakes/Jets: Jets Wakes/Jets: Separated flows
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 936 , 10 April 2022 , A30
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birkhoff, G. & Zarantonello, E. 1957 Jets, Wakes and Cavities. Academic.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, L. & Brizzolara, S. 2016 A multiphase RANSE-based computational tool for the analysis of super-cavitating hydrofoils. Naval Engrs J. 128 (1), 47–64.Google Scholar
Brennen, C.E. 1995 Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, T.E. & Bate, E.R. 1962 An experimental investigation of a fully cavitating two-dimensional flat-plate hydrofoil near a free surface. Tech. Rep. E-118.12. Karman Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics and Jet Propulsion, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
DeLillo, T.K., Elcrat, A.R. & Hu, C. 2005 Computation of the Helmholtz–Kirchhoff and reentrant jet flows using Fourier series. Appl. Maths Comput. 163, 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efros, D. 1946 Hydrodynamical theory of two-dimensional flow with cavitation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 51 (4), 267–270.Google Scholar
Franc, J.-P. & Michel, J.-M. 2004 Fundamentals of Cavitation. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 76. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Geurst, J.A. 1960 Linearized theory for fully cavitated hydrofoils. Intl Shipbuilding Prog. 7 (65), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbarg, D. 1960 Jets and Cavities, Encyclopedia of Physics, vol. 9. Springer.Google Scholar
Gilbarg, D. & Serrin, J. 1950 Free boundaries and jets in the theory of cavitation. J. Maths Phys. 29, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, M.I. 1965 The Theory of Jets in an Ideal Fluid. Academic.Google Scholar
Gurevich, M.I. 1979 The Theory of jets in an Ideal Fluid, 2nd edn. Nauka.Google Scholar
Karn, A., Arndt, R.E.A. & Hong, J. 2016 An experimental investigation into supercavity closure mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanami, Y., Kato, H., Yamaguchi, H. & Tagaya, M.T.Y. 1997 Mechanism and control of cloud cavitation. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 119 (4), 788–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnas, S. & Fine, N. 1991 Non-linear analysis of the flow around partially or super-cavitating hydrofoils by a potential based panel method. In Boundary Integral Methods (ed. L. Morino & R. Piva), pp. 289–300. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisel, G. 1946 Cavitation with finite cavitation numbers. Tech. Rep. Rl/H/36. Admiralty Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L.M. 1968 Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 4th edn. Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, Y. 1958 The flow with wake past an oblique plate. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 13 (9), 1048–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiedzka, A., Schnerr, G.H. & Sobieski, W. 2016 Review of numerical models of cavitating flows with the use of the homogeneous approach. Arch. Thermodyn. 37 (2), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palatini, A. 1916 Sulla confluenza di due vene. Atti del R. Istituto Veneto di Sc. Lett. ed Arti LXXV (parte 2), 451–463.Google Scholar
Terent'ev, A.G. 1976 Nonlinear theory of cavitational flow around obstacles. Fluid Dyn. 11, 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terentiev, A.G., Kirschner, I.N. & Uhlman, J.S. 2011 The Hydrodynamics of Cavitating Flows. Backbone.Google Scholar
Tulin, M.P. 1964 Supercavitating flows – small perturbation theory. J. Ship Res. 7 (3), 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernengo, G., Bonfiglio, L., Gaggero, S. & Brizzolara, S. 2016 Physics-based design by optimization of unconventional supercavitating hydrofoils. J. Ship Res. 60 (4), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, R.B. 1964 Water tunnel observations on the flow past plano-convex hydrofoil. Tech. Rep. E-79.6. Hydrodynamics Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Wade, R.B. & Acosta, A.J. 1966 Experimental observations on the flow past a plano-convex hydrofoil. Trans. ASME J. Basic Engng 88, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T.Y.-T. 1956 A free streamline theory for two-dimensional fully cavitated hydrofoils. Stud. Appl. Maths 35 (1–4), 236–265.Google Scholar
Wu, T.Y.-T. 1962 A wake model for free-streamline flow theory. Part 1. Fully and partially developed wake flows and cavity flows past an oblique flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 13 (2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Chen, M. & Shao, X. 2018 Inhibition of cloud cavitation on a flat hydrofoil through the placement of an obstacle. Ocean Engng 155, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Maklakov and Lexina supplementary material

Maklakov and Lexina supplementary material

Download Maklakov and Lexina supplementary material(File)
File 217.7 KB