Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:39:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On source-sink flows in a rotating fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

R. Hide
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, U.S.A.

Abstract

An incompressible fluid fills a container of fixed shape and size and of uniform cross-section in the (x, y)-plane, the m rigid side walls and the two rigid end walls being in contact with the fluid. Here (x, y, z) are the Cartesian co-ordinates of a general point in the frame of reference in which the container is stationary. Fluid is withdrawn from the container at Q cm3/sec via certain permeable parts of the side walls and replaced at the same steady rate via other permeable parts of the side walls. As, by hypothesis, the vorticity of the entering and leaving fluid relative to the container is zero, the concomitant fluid motion within the container, Eulerian velocity u = −∇ϕ − ∇ × A, is irrotational when the container is stationary in an inertial frame. The present paper is concerned with the effects on u of uniform rotation of the whole system with angular velocity Ω about the z-axis when the normal component of u on the side walls is independent of z.

In the simplest conceivable case, Dzuzl is infinite (but D/Q remains finite). End effects are then negligible and u is everywhere independent of z. The solenoidal component of u, − ∇ × A, corresponds to j gyres, one for each of the j irreducible sets of circuits across which the net flow of fluid does not vanish that can be drawn within the m-ply connected region bounded by the side walls. While ∇ϕ, which satisfies ∇2ϕ = 0, depends on Q but not on Ω, j and v (the coefficient of kinematic viscosity), ∇ × A depends on all these quantities but vanishes identically when jΩ = 0. When jΩ ≠ 0 but v → 0, ∇2A + 2Ω, the absolute vorticity, tends to zero everywhere except in certain singular regions near the bounding surfaces, where boundary layers form.

End effects cannot be ignored when D is finite. When D is independent of x and y and equal to D0 (say) and Ω is sufficiently large for the boundary layers on the end walls to be of the Ekman type, 95% thickness δ = 3(v/Ω)½ (δ [Lt ] D0), the end effects that then arise are only confined to these boundary layers when j = 0. When j ≠ 0 boundary-layer suction influences the flow everywhere; thus ∇2A and ∇ϕ (but not ∇ × A) are reduced to zero in the main body of the fluid, the regions of non-zero ∇ϕ and ∇2A being the Ekman boundary layers on the end walls and boundary layers of another type, 95% thickness δs (typically greater than δ), on the side walls. A theoretical analysis of the structure of these boundary layers shows that non-linear effects, though unimportant in the end-wall boundary layers, can be significant and even dominant in the side-wall boundary layers. The analysis of an axisymmetric system, whose side walls are two coaxial cylinders, suggests an approximate expression for Δs. When D is not everywhere independent of x and y, non-viscous end effects arise which produce relative vorticity in the main body of the fluid even when j = 0.

Experiments using a variety of source-sink distribution generally confirm the results of the theory, show that instabilities of various kinds may occur under certain circumstances, and suggest several promising lines for future work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1968 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arons, A. B., Ingersoll, A. P. & Green, T. 1961 Tellus, 13, 31.
Barcilon, V. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 27, 551.
Charney, J. G. & Eliassen, A. 1949 Tellus, 1, no. 2, 38.
Faller, A. J. 1960 Tellus, 12, 159.
Faller, A. J. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 15, 560.
Gregory, N., Stuart, J. T. & Walker, W. S. 1955 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 248, 155.
Hamel, R. 1916 Jahrs. deutschen Math. Ver. 25, 34.
Herbert, D. M. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 23, 65.
Hide, R. 1963 Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, V 7, 481.
Hide, R. 1966 Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 47, 873.
Hide, R. 1967 Phys. Fluids, 10, S 306.
Hide, R., Ibbetson, A. & Lighthill, M. J. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 32, 251.
Lamb, H. 1945 Hydrodynamics. New York: Dover.
Lewellen, W. S. 1965 Am. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 3, 91.
Prandtl, L. 1952 Essentials of Fluid Dynamics. London: Blackie and Sons.
Proudman, I. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 505.
Proudman, J. 1916 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 92, 408.
Rott, N. & Lewellen, W. S. 1966 Article in Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, 7 (ed. D. Küchemann). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Stern, M. E. 1960 Tellus, 12, 399.
Stewartson, K. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 3, 17.
Stommel, H., Arons, A. B. & Faller, A. J. 1958 Tellus, 10, 179.
Tatro, P. R. & MOLLO-CHRISTENSEN, E. L. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 28, 531.
Taylor, G. I. 1917 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 93, 99.