Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:22:06.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On prediction of the turbulent flow over a wavy boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Russ E. Davis
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

Abstract

The importance of fluctuating turbulent stresses in the flow over a wave is examined. It is shown that anisotropic stresses, which are most likely to be turbulent Reynolds stresses, are essential to the process of energy flow to the wave. Two fundamentally different methods of predicting fluctuating turbulent Reynolds stresses are examined. One method makes use of a phenomenological closure of the conservation equation for the turbulent Reynolds stresses and is similar to the turbulent boundary-layer calculation scheme of Bradshaw, Ferriss & Atwell (1967). The second method is based on the assumption that the turbulent stresses are determined by the recent history of velocity shear experienced by a fluid parcel and results in a viscoelastic constitutive relation for the turbulence; in the limit of shortest’ memory’ this relation becomes the eddy viscosity model proposed by Hussain & Reynolds (1970). Comparison of predicted and measured values of surface pressure indicates that the eddy viscoelasticity model can explain measured pressure distributions but the comparison is not conclusive. Suggestions for further measurements are made.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1972 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Bradshaw, P., Ferris, D. H. & Atwell, N. P. 1967 Calculation of boundary-layer development using the turbulent energy equation. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 593.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1969 On the high Reynolds number flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 36, 337.Google Scholar
Datis, R. E. 1970 On the turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 721.Google Scholar
Dobson, F. W. 1969 Observations of normal pressure on wind generated sea waves. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Physics, University British Columbia.
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Hussain, A. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of a perturbation wave in turbulent shear flow. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University Rep. FM6.
Kendall, J. M. 1970 The turbulent boundary layer over a wall with progressive surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 259.Google Scholar
Lichthill, M. J. 1962 Physical interpretation of the mathematical theory of wave generation by wind. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 385.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. 1955 The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Lumley, J. L. & Panofsky, H. A. 1964 The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence. Wiley.
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1967 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 5. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 163.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1966 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, R. H. 1970 Laboratory studies of the velocity field of deep-water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 733.Google Scholar
Volkov, Iu. A. 1969 Spectra of velocity and temperature fluctuations in the airflow above the agitated sea surface. Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys. 5, 1251.Google Scholar