Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T01:43:55.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nonlinear stability of flows over compliant walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

M. D. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Present address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.

Abstract

The weakly nonlinear, high-Reynolds-number triple-deck theory of Smith (1979) is applied to Blasius flow over a compliant wall. Attention is concentrated on Tollmien–Schlichting (TS) disturbance waves. We consider wall models of the Carpenter–Garrad type, modified to cater for three-dimensional disturbances, and allowing for the effects of nonlinear wall curvature. Supercritical equilibrium-amplitude states are possible for TS waves in a rigid-wall boundary layer, as is well known (see for example Smith 1979; Hall & Smith 1984). It is found that judicious choice of wall parameters can dramatically alter the nonlinear stability properties of TS waves in the boundary layer over a compliant wall: waves that are linearly damped may become nonlinearly unstable. Excellent agreement is obtained with rigid-wall results of Hall & Smith (1984).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carpenter, P. W. & Gajjar, J. S. B. 1990 A general theory for two- and three-dimensional wall-mode instabilities in boundary layers over isotropic and anisotropic compliant walls. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 349378.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D., 1985 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465510.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D., 1986 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow-induced surface instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 199232.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Morris, P. J., 1990 The effect of anisotropic wall compliance on boundary layer stability and transition. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 171223.Google Scholar
Gajjar, J. S. B.: 1990 Nonlinear stability of flow over compliant surfaces. In Proc. 5th European Drag Reduction Meeting, London, November 1990. Kluwer.
Hall, P. & Smith, F. T., 1984 On the effects of nonparallelism, three-dimensionality and mode interaction in nonlinear boundary-layer stability. Stud. Appl. Maths. 70, 91120.Google Scholar
Ince, E. L.: 1956 Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover.
Joslin, R. D. & Morris, P. J., 1991 The effect of compliant walls on secondary instabilities in boundary-layer transition. AIAA Paper 91–0738.Google Scholar
Joslin, R. D., Morris, P. J. & Carpenter, P. W., 1991 Role of three-dimensional instabilities in compliant wall boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 29, 16031610.Google Scholar
Mackerrell, S. O.: 1988 Some hydrodynamic instabilities of boundary layer flows. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter.
Metcalfe, R. W., Battistoni, F. & Ekeroot, J., 1991 Evolution of boundary layer flow over a compliant wall during transition to turbulence. In Proc. Conf. on Boundary Layer Transition & Control, Cambridge, April 1991. Royal Aeronautical Society.
Rotenberry, R. M. & Saffman, P. G., 1990 Effect of compliant boundaries on weakly nonlinear shear waves in channel flow. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 50, 361394.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.: 1979 Nonlinear stability of boundary layers for disturbances of various sizes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 368, 573589 (and corrections A 371, 1980, 439–440).Google Scholar
Thomas, M. D.: 1990 Nonlinear stability of flows over rigid and flexible boundaries. Ph.D. thesis, University of St. Andrews.
Thomas, M. D.: 1992 On the resonant triad interaction in flows over rigid and flexible boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 417441.Google Scholar