Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T23:20:41.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetohydrodynamic flow at a rear stagnation point

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

S. Leibovich
Affiliation:
Department of Thermal Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Abstract

An exact rear stagnation point solution is sought for a viscous, incompressible conducting fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. It is found that a steady solution exists only if [Nscr ] ≥ 2, where [Nscr ] = σB2/ρα is the interaction parameter of the flow based upon the normal component of the magnetic field at the wall. Here α is a positive rate of strain, which, for a finite body with length l and velocity U0, is of the order of U0/l.

The steady solution is found, and from its existence it is inferred that separation of the viscous boundary layer does not begin at the rear stagnation point when [Nscr ] ≥ 2, and that such separation can be prevented. This supports theoretical work by Moreau (1964) and experimental work of Tsinober, Shtern & Shcherbinin (1963).

When [Nscr ] < 2, the flow is necessarily unsteady, and in this case an asymptotic analysis (as t → ∞) similar to that of Proudman & Johnson (1962) is undertaken. For [Nscr ] < 1, the magnetic and non-magnetic flows are qualitatively alike, in that there is a growing inviscid region dominated by eddies, and an ultimately steady layer at the wall representing a viscous forward stagnation point flow.

For 1 < [Nscr ] < 2, the inviscid region again grows with time, but no eddies appear. It is thus suggested that for this range of [Nscr ] separation occurs without reversed flow.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blasius, H. 1908 Grenzschichten in Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung Z. Math. Phys. 56, 1.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1965 On similarity solutions of the boundary-layer equations with algebraic decay J. Fluid Mech. 23, 67387.Google Scholar
Coppel, W. A. 1960 On a differential equation of boundary-layer theory. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc A 253, 10135.Google Scholar
Fucks, W., Fischer, E. & Uhlenbusch, J. 1964 Laminare Grenzschichten an zylin-drischen Körpern in der Magnetohydrodynamik Z. Flugwissenschaften, 11, 38995.Google Scholar
Glauert, M. B. 1956 The laminar boundary-layer on oscillating plates and cylinders J. Fluid Mech. 1, 97110.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1965 On backwards boundary layers and flow in converging passages J. Fluid Mech. 21, 3345.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1939 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 35, 33840.
Heiser, W. H. & Shercliff, J. A. 1965 A simple demonstration of the Hartmann layer J. Fluid Mech. 22, 7017.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1967 On the differential equation for ‘backward’ boundary-layers with a magnetic field. To appear in Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.Google Scholar
Ludford, G. S. S. 1963 Hydromagnetic stagnation-point flow for small RM. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 43, 924.Google Scholar
Moreau, R. 1964 L'effet d'un champ magnétique transversal sur le decollement C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 258, 173235.Google Scholar
Proudman, I. & Johnson, K. 1962 Boundary-layer growth near a rear stagnation point J. Fluid Mech. 12, 1618.Google Scholar
Sears, W. R. 1961 On a boundary-layer phenomenon in magneto-fluid dynamics Astro. Acta 7, 22336.Google Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1965 A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics, pp. 846. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Tsinober, A., Shtern, A. & Shcherbinin, E. 1963 On the separation of the magneto-hydrodynamic boundary-layer [in Russian]. Latvijas PSR Zinatnu Akad. Vestis 12, 4956. Also [unedited English translation] Foreign Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, U.S.A., FTD-TT-65-27.Google Scholar