Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:32:33.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-frequency sound radiation and generation due to the interaction of unsteady flow with a jet pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

A. M. Cargill
A. M. Cargill
Affiliation:
Noise Department, Rolls-Royce Limited, P.O. Box 31, Derby DE2 8BJ, U.K., and Department of Applied Mathematical Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we examine the low-frequency sound radiated when various types of unsteady flow interact with a jet pipe. In each case we solve the problem exactly by the Wiener-Hopf technique, producing results valid for arbitrary internal and ex- ternal Mach numbers and temperatures, discuss the importance of a Kutta condition at the duct exit, and provide an interpretation, in elementary terms, of the radiated sound field using the Lighthill acoustic analogy. A central feature is that the solutions are always obtained subject to a causality requirement, regardless of whether or not a Kutta condition is imposed at the pipe lip.

When low-frequency sound propagates down the jet pipe, little of it reaches the far field, and the major disturbance outside the pipe is that associated with the jet instability waves. At subsonic jet speeds and low-enough Strouhal number these waves transport kinetic energy at a rate precisely balancing the loss of acoustic energy from the pipe, resulting in a net attenuation of the sound power. For supersonic jet condi- tions a further wave motion, the unsteady-flow counterpart of the steady wave struc- ture of an imperfectly expanded jet, is present in addition to the instability wave. We use the Lighthill acoustic analogy to show that, for high-enough jet Mach number and temperature, the sound radiation is caused largely by quadrupole sources arising from the jet instability waves. An alternative interpretation uses the acoustic analogy incorporating a mean flow due to Dowling, Ffowcs Williams and Goldstein, and expresses the far-field sound as the sum of contributions from monopoles and dipoles distributed over the duct exit. The directivity and power of the calculated far-field sound are in good agreement with experiments.

We also calculate the sound scattered by the jet pipe when there is an incident external sound field, and show a previously published result to be in error. In general, the flbw phenomena produced by internal and external incident sound fields are similar. Finally, we discuss the effects of nozzle contraction. We find that the radiated sound field is little changed in character, but that the reflection properties of the nozzle may be drastically altered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 121 , August 1982 , pp. 59 - 105
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechert, D. W. 1979 Sound absorption caused by vorticity shedding demonstrated with a jet flow. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 79-0575.
Bechert, D. W., Michel, U. & Pfizenmaier, E. 1977 Experiments on the transmission of sound through jets. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 77–1928.
Bryce, W. D. 1979 Experiments concerning the anomalous behaviour of aero-engine exhaust noise in flight. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 79–0648.
Cargill, A. M. 1981 The aeroacoustics of jet pipes and cascades. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds.
Cargill, A. M. 1982 Low frequency acoustic radiation from a jet pipe – a second order theory. J. Sound Vib. (in press).Google Scholar
Carrier, G. F. 1956 Sound transmission from a tube with flow. Quart. Appl. Math. 13, 457–461.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1972 The excess noise field of subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 683–694.Google Scholar
Cumpsty, N. A. & Marble, F. E. 1977 The interaction of entropy fluctuations with turbine blade rows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A357, 323–344.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P., Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Goldstein, M. E. 1978 Sound production in a moving stream. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 288, 321–439.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1972 Current papers of the Aeronautical Research Council. C.P. no. 1195. Papers on novel aerodynamic source mechanisms at low jet speeds, chap. 2.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Hawkings, D. L. 1969 Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 264, 321–342.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Howe, M. S. 1975 The generation of sound by density inhomogeneities in low Mach number nozzle flows. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 605–622.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1975 The low frequency sound from multipole sources in axisymmetric shear flows with application to jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 595–604.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1975 Contributions to the theory of aerodynamic sound with application to excess jet noise and the theory of the flute. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 625–673.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1976 The influence of vortex shedding on the generation of sound by convected turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 711–740.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1979 Attenuation of sound in a low Mach number nozzle flow. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 209–229.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. & Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1978 On the noise of an imperfectly expanded supersonic jet. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 289, 271–314.Google Scholar
Ingard, U. & Singhal, V. K. 1975 Effect of flow on the acoustic resonances of an open duct. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 788–793.Google Scholar
Jacques, J. R. 1975 The acoustic response of a nozzle flow to an externally applied low frequency pressure field. J. Sound Vib. 41, 13–32.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. & Morgan, J. D. 1974 A linear model of a finite Helmholtz instability. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 388, 17–41.Google Scholar
Leppington, F. G. 1971 Current papers of the Aeronautical Research Council. C.P. no. 1195. Papers on novel aerodynamic source mechanisms at low jet speeds, chap. 5.
Levine, H. & Schwinger, J. 1948 On the radiation of sound from an unflanged circular pipe. Phys. Rev. 73, 383–406.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 221, 564–587.Google Scholar
Mani, R. 1973 Refraction of acoustic duct wave-guide modes by exhaust jets. Quart. Appl. Mech. 30, 501–520.Google Scholar
Mani, R. 1974 The jet density exponent issue for the noise of heated subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 611–622.Google Scholar
Mani, R. 1981 Low-frequency sound propagation in a quasi-one-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 81–92.Google Scholar
Marble, F. E. & Candel, S. M. 1977 Acoustic disturbance from gas non-uniformities convected through a nozzle. J. Sound Vib. 55, 225–244.Google Scholar
Moore, C. J. 1977 The role of shear layer instability waves in jet exhaust noise. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 321–367.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. D. 1974 The interaction of sound with a semi-infinite vortex sheet. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 27, 465–487.Google Scholar
Munt, R. M. 1977 The interaction of sound with a subsonic jet issuing from a semi-infinite cylindrical pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 609–640.Google Scholar
Munt, R. M. 1982a Acoustic transmission properties of a jet pipe with subsonic jet flow. I. The cold jet reflection coefficient. Submitted to J. Sound Vib.Google Scholar
Munt, R. M. 1982b Acoustic transmission properties of a jet pipe with subsonic jet flow. II. The cold jet radiated power. To be submitted to J. Sound Vib.Google Scholar
Noble, B. 1958 Methods Based on the Wiener–Hopf Technique, Pergamon.
Pinker, R. A. & Bryce, W. D. 1976 The radiation of plane wave duct noise from a jet exhaust statically and in flight. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 76–581.Google Scholar
Savkar, S. D. 1975 Radiation of cylindrical duct acoustic modes with flow mismatch. J. Sound Vib. 42, 383–386.Google Scholar