Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:05:28.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large-eddy simulation and experimental study of heat transfer, nitric oxide emissions and combustion instability in a swirled turbulent high-pressure burner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2021

Patrick Schmitt ,
T. Poinsot ,
B. Schuermans  and
K. P. Geigle
Patrick Schmitt
Affiliation:
CERFACS, 42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse cedex 1, France
T. Poinsot
Affiliation:
IMFT, Allée du Professeur Camille Soula, 31400 Toulouse, France
B. Schuermans
Affiliation:
ALSTOM Power Ltd., Pavillion 3.2, 5401 Baden, Switzerland
K. P. Geigle
Affiliation:
DLR, Pfaffenwaldring 38–40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nitric oxide formation in gas turbine combustion depends on four key factors: flame stabilization, heat transfer, fuel–air mixing and combustion instability. The design of modern gas turbine burners requires delicate compromises between fuel efficiency, emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and combustion stability. Burner designs allowing substantial NOx reduction are often prone to combustion oscillations. These oscillations also change the NOx fields. Being able to predict not only the main species field in a burner but also the pollutant and the oscillation levels is now a major challenge for combustion modelling. This must include a realistic treatment of unsteady acoustic phenomena (which create instabilities) and also of heat transfer mechanisms (convection and radiation) which control NOx generation.

In this work, large-eddy simulation (LES) is applied to a realistic gas turbine combustion chamber configuration where pure methane is injected through multiple holes in a cone-shaped burner. In addition to a non-reactive simulation, this article presents three reactive simulations and compares them to experimental results. The first reactive simulation neglects effects of cooling air on flame stabilization and heat losses by radiation and convection. The second reactive simulation shows how cooling air and heat transfer affect nitric oxide emissions. Finally, the third reactive simulation shows the effects of combustion instability on nitric oxide emissions. Additionally, the combustion instability is analysed in detail, including the evaluation of the terms in the acoustic energy equation and the identification of the mechanism driving the oscillation.

Results confirm that LES of gas turbine combustion requires not only an accurate chemical scheme and realistic heat transfer models but also a proper description of the acoustics in order to predict nitric oxide emissions and pressure oscillation levels simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 570 , 10 January 2007 , pp. 17 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angelberger, C., Veynante, D. & Egolfopoulos, F. 2000 Large Eddy Simulations of chemical and acoustic forcing of a premixed dump combustor. Flow, Turb. Combust. 65 (2), 205–222.Google Scholar
Barlow, R., Karpetis, A., Frank, J. & Chen, J.-Y. 2001 Scalar profiles and no formation in laminar opposed-flow partially premixed methane/air flames. Combust. Flame 127, 2102–2118.Google Scholar
Baum, M., Thevenin, D. & Poinsot, T. 1994 Accurate boundary conditions for multispecies reacting flows. J. Comput. Phys. 116, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bédat, B., Egolfopoulos, F. & Poinsot, T. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of heat release and NOx formation in turbulent nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame 119 (1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branley, N. & Jones, W. P. 2001 Large Eddy Simulation of a turbulent non-premixed flame. Combust. Flame 127, 1914–1934.Google Scholar
Butler, T. & O'Rourke, P. 1977 A numerical method for two-dimensional unsteady reacting flows. In 16th Symp. (Intl) on Combustion, pp. 1503–1515.Google Scholar
Cabot, W. & Moin, P. 2000 Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high reynolds number flow. Flow Turb. Combust. 63, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarthy, V. K. & Menon, S. 2000 Large-Eddy Simulation of turbulent premixed flames in the flamelet regime. Combust. Sci. Technol. 7, 1–48.Google Scholar
Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D. & Poinsot, T. 2000 A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 12, 1843–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, O. & Rudgyard, M. 2000 Development of high-order Taylor-Galerkin schemes for unsteady calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 162 (2), 338–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, J. 2004 Modélisation des transferts radiatifs en combustion par methode aux ordonnées discretes sur des maillages non structurés tridimensionnels. PhD thesis, INP Toulouse.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. 1970 A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doebbeling, K., Eroglu, A., Joos, F. & Hellat, J. 1999 Novel technologies for natural gas combustion in turbine systems. In Eurogas 99. Ruhr University Bachum.Google Scholar
Duchamp de Lageneste, L. & Pitsch, H. 2000 A level-set approach to large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. In CTR Annual Research Briefs.Google Scholar
Glarborg, P., Miller, J. & Kee, R. 1986 Kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of nitrogen oxide formation in well-stirred reactors. Combust. Flame 65, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, J., Lim, J., Takeno, T. & Zhu, X. 1999 A study of the effects of thermal radiation on the structure of methane/air counter-flow diffusion flames using detailed chemical kinetics. In Book of Abstracts of the 5th ASME/JSME Joint Thermal Engineering Conference, p. 50.Google Scholar
Grosshandler, W. 1993 RADCAL: A narrow-band model for radiation calculations in a combustion environment. Tech. Rep. 1402. NIST.Google Scholar
Grötzbach, G. 1987 Direct numerical and larger eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. In Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, pp. 1337–1391. West Orange.Google Scholar
Janicka, J. & Sadiki, A. 2005 Large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion systems. In 30th Symp. (Intl) on Combustion, pp. 537–547.Google Scholar
Ju, Y., Masuya, G. & Ronney, P. 1998 Effects of radiative emission and absorption on the propagation and extinction of premixed gas flames. In 27th Symp. (Intl) on Combustion, pp. 2619–2626.Google Scholar
Kee, R., Grcar, J., Smooke, M., Miller, J. & Meeks, E. 1998 Premix: a fortran program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames. Tech. Rep. Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
Keller, J. 1995 Thermoacoustic oscillations in combustion chambers of gas turbines. AIAA J. 33 (12), 2280–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launder, B. & Spalding, D. 1974 The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 3, 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A. 1998 Gas Turbine Combustion. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lieuwen, T. C. 2001 A mechanism of combustion instability in lean premixed gas turbine combustors. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power 123, 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. 2004 EPORCK user guide V1.8. Tech. Rep. TR/CFD/04/84. CERFACS.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Benoit, L., Nicoud, F. & Poinsot, T. 2004 Analysis of acoustic energy and modes in a turbulent swirled combustor. In Proc. Summer Program, pp. 377–394. Center for Turbulence Research, NASA AMES/Stanford University.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Benoit, L., Sommerer, Y., Nicoud, F. & Poinsot, T. 2006 LES and acoustic analysis of combustion instability in a staged turbulent swirled combustor. AIAA J. 44, 741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Poinsot, T. 1991 Stretching and quenching of flamelets in premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 86, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. & Bowman, C. 1989 Mechanism and modeling of nitrogen chemistry in combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 15, 287–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P., Pierce, C. & Pitsch, H. 2000 Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent, nonpremixed combustion. In Advances in Turbulence VIII, pp. 385–392. CIMNE, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Moureau, V., Lartigue, G., Sommerer, Y., Angelberger, C., Colin, O. & Poinsot, T. 2005 Numerical methods for unsteady compressible multi-component reacting flows on fixed and moving grids. J. Comput. Phys. 202 (2), 710–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, D., Malte, P., Lai, J., Marinov, N. & Pratt, D. 1992 NOx sensitivities for gas turbine engines operated on lean-premixed combustion and conventional diffusion flames. In ASME Intl Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, N. 2000 Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U. & Balaras, E. 2002 Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. & Lele, S. 1992 Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1), 104–129.Google Scholar
Poinsot, T., Trouvé, A., Veynante, D., Candel, S. & Esposito, E. 1987 Vortex driven acoustically coupled combustion instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. & Veynante, D. 2005 Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2ndEdn. R.T. Edwards.Google Scholar
Poinsot, T., Veynante, D. & Candel, S. 1991 Quenching processes and premixed turbulent combustion diagrams. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 561–605.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1878 The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena. Nature, July 18 pp. 319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagaut, P. 2000 Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Schumann, U. 1975 Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J. Comput. Phys. 18, 376–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selle, L., Lartigue, G., Poinsot, T., Koch, R., Schildmacher, K.-U., Krebs, W., Prade, B., Kaufmann, P. & Veynante, D. 2004a Compressible Large-Eddy Simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes. Combust. Flame 137 (4), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selle, L., Nicoud, F. & Poinsot, T. 2004b The actual impedance of non-reflecting boundary conditions: implications for the computation of resonators. AIAA J. 42 (5), 958–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J., Manabe, S. & Holloway, S. 1963 General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon. Weather Rev 91 (3), 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. P., Golden, D. M., Frenklach, M., Moriarty, N. W., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, C. T., Hanson, R. K., Song, S., Gardiner, W. C., Lissianski, V. V. & Qin, Z. 1999 Gri-Mech Website. In http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech.Google Scholar
Taine, J. & Petit, J.-P. 1995 Transferts Thermiques. Dunod.Google Scholar
Wei, T. & Willmarth, W. 1989 Reynolds-number effects on the structure of a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 204, 57–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar