Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:40:20.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of the horizontal component of Earth's angular velocity on the instability of the Ekman layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

S. Leibovich  and
S. K. Lele
S. Leibovich
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca. New York
S. K. Lele
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca. New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A systematic study is made of the effect of latitude on the linear, normal mode stability characteristics of the laminar barotropic Ekman layer. The outcome depends upon the direction of the geostrophic flow (in the case of flows modelling the atmospheric Ekman layer) or, alternatively, upon the direction of the applied stress (in the case of flows modelling the oceanic Ekman layer). The minimum critical Reynolds number Rc is a function of latitude. For the atmospheric Ekman layer Rc = 30.8 for all latitudes less than 26.2° and increases monotonically with latitude to 54.2. At a latitude of 45° N, Rc is 33.9 and arises for a geostrophic wind directed towards a compass heading 252° (clockwise from north), corresponding to rolls with axes pointing due west and having wavenumber k (with unit of length taken to be the Ekman layer depth) of 0.594. The minimum Rc for the oceanic boundary layer is 11.6 for latitudes less than 81.1°, and increases with latitude to 11.8. At 45° N latitude, the critical condition arises for a surface-current compass heading of 345.2°, roll axis of 351° and a wavenumber k = 0.33. The results for Rc are all symmetric about the equator, with roll axes and associated basic flow directions rotated by 180°. As the Reynolds number R increases, the effects of the perturbation Coriolis acceleration on the instability diminish, as has been previously shown, and the error caused by neglect of the horizontal component of angular velocity therefore decreases. The high Reynolds number limit is systematically explored. It is shown that the lower branch of the neutral curve is not inviscid as R → ∞; rather kR → constant. The upper branch is inviscid in the limit R → ∞, and corresponds to a regular or singular neutral mode depending on whether the angle ε between the outer geostrophic flow and the roll axis is greater or less than 15.93°. ‘Inflectional’ modes, thought to be relevant by some investigators, do not exist for ε < 15.93°. Lastly, the most unstable inviscid mode corresponding to zero phase speed, a condition to which certain well-known experiments are sensitive, occurs at ε = 11.8° with wavenumber k = 0.6. This is in good agreement with published experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 150 , January 1985 , pp. 41 - 87
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asai, T. & Nakasuji I.1973 On the stability of Ekman boundary layer flow with thermally unstable stratification. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan 51, 29–42.Google Scholar
Barcilon V.1965 Stability of a non-divergent Ekman layer. Tellus 17, 53–68.Google Scholar
Brown R. A.1970 A secondary flow model for the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 742–757.Google Scholar
Brown R. A.1972 On the inflection point instability of a stratified Ekman boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 850–859.Google Scholar
Brown R. A.1980 Longitudinal instabilities and secondary flows in the planetary boundary layer: a review. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 18, 683–697.Google Scholar
Caldwell, D. R. & Van Atta C. W.1970 Characteristics of Ekman boundary layer instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 79–95.Google Scholar
Dudis, J. J. & Davis S. H.1971 Energy stability of the Ekman boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 47, 405–413.Google Scholar
Eckart C.1960 Hydrodynamics of Oceans and Atmospheres. Pergamon.
Ekman V. W.1905 On the influence of the Earth's rotation on ocean currents Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys. 2, no. 11.Google Scholar
Etling D.1971 The stability of an Ekman boundary layer flow as influenced by the thermal stratification. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 44, 168–186.Google Scholar
Etling, D. & Wppermann F.1975 On the instability of a planetary boundary layer with Rossby-number similarity. Boundary-Layer Meteor. 9, 341–360.Google Scholar
Faller A. J.1963 An experimental study of the instability of the laminar Ekman boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 15, 560–576.Google Scholar
Faller A. J.1965 Large eddies in the atmospheric boundary layer and their possible role in the formation of cloud rows. J. Atmos Sci. 22, 176–184.Google Scholar
Faller, A. J. & Kaylor R. E. 1966a Investigations of stability and transition in rotating boundary layers. In Dynamics of Fluids and Plasmas (ed. S. I. Pai), pp. 309–329. Academic Press.
Faller, A. J. & Kaylor R. E.1966b A numerical study of the instability of the laminar Ekman boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 466–480.Google Scholar
Faller, A. J. & Kaylor R. E.1967 Instability of the Ekman spiral with applications to the planetary boundary layer. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 10, 212–219.Google Scholar
Finlayson B. A.1972 The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles. Academic.
Gill, A. E. & Davey A.1969 Instabilities of a buoyancy-driven system. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 775–798.Google Scholar
Gregory N., Stuart, J. T. & Walker W. S.1956 On the stability of three dimensional boundary layers with application to the flow due to a rotating disk Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 248, 155–199.Google Scholar
Greenspan H. P.1968 The Theory of Rotating Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Holton J. R.1979 An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, 2nd edn. Academic.
Iooss G., Nielsen, H. B. & True H.1978 Bifurcation of the stationary Ekman flow into a stable periodic flow. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 68, 227–256.Google Scholar
Kaylor, R. & Faller A. J.1972 Instability of the stratified Ekman boundary layer and the generation of internal waves. J. Atm. Sci. 29, 497–509.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. & Stewartson K.1983 On the stability of columnar vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 335–366.Google Scholar
Lessen M.1978 On power laws for turbulent jets, wakes and shearing layers and their relationship to the principle of marginal instability. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 535–540.Google Scholar
Lele S. K.1985 Some problems of hydrodynamic stability arising in geophysical fluid dynamics. Ph.D. thesis. Cornell University.
Lilly D.K. 1966 On the instability of Ekman boundary flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 481–494.Google Scholar
Lin C. C.1955 The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Lumley J. L.1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation (ed. A. M. Yaglom & V. I. Tatarsky), pp. 157–163. Nauka.
Lumley J. L.1981 Coherent structures in turbulence. In Transition and Turbulence (ed. R. E. Meyer). Academic.
Malkus W. V. R.1956 Outline of a theory of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 521–539.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. & Veronis G.1958 Finite amplitude cellular convection. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 225–260.Google Scholar
Melander M. V.1983 An algorithmic approach to the linear stability of the Ekman layer. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 283–293.Google Scholar
Miles J. W.1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496–508.Google Scholar
Nielson, H. B. & True, H. 1979 Numerical solution of the nonlinear stability of an incompressible Ekman boundary layer. In Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, 1978 (ed. H. Cabannes, M. Holt & V. V. Rusanor). Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 90. Springer.
Orszag S. A.1971 Accurate solution of the Orr—Sommerfeld stability equation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 689–703.Google Scholar
Spooner G. F.1983 Stability of free surface Ekman layers. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 663–677.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. F. & Criminals W. O.1982 The evolution of disturbances in an Ekman boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 327–346.Google Scholar
Stern M. E.1960 Instability of Ekman flow at large Taylor number. Tellus 12, 399–417.Google Scholar
Tatro, P. R. & Mollo-Christensen E. L.1967 Experiments on Ekman layer instability. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 531–543.Google Scholar
Weber J. E.1980 Symmetric instability of stratified geostrophic flow. Tellus 32, 176–185.Google Scholar
Weidman P. D.1976 On the spin-up and spin-down of a rotating fluid. Part 2. Measurements and stability. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 709–735.Google Scholar
Wippermann F.1969 The orientation of vortices due to instability of the Ekman-boundary layer. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 48, 30–45.Google Scholar
Wippermann F., Etling, D. & Kirstein H. J.1978 On the instability of a planetary boundary layer with Rossby number similarity. Part II. The combined effect of inflection point instability and convective instability. Boundary-Layer Meteor. 15, 301–321.Google Scholar