Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T19:54:03.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global modes of variable-viscosity two-phase swirling flows and their triadic resonance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2023

S. Schmidt Open the ORCID record for S. Schmidt [Opens in a new window]  and
K. Oberleithner Open the ORCID record for K. Oberleithner [Opens in a new window]
S. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Flow Instability and Dynamics, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
K. Oberleithner
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Flow Instability and Dynamics, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
*
†Email address for correspondence: s.schmidt@fdx.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The linear and nonlinear dynamics of two-phase swirling flows produced by the Grabowski–Berger profile under the influence of a viscosity stratification are investigated. We perform axisymmetric nonlinear simulations and fully three-dimensional linear global stability analysis of the flow for several swirl numbers $S$ and viscosity ratios $\tilde {\mu }$. They are accompanied by nonlinear three-dimensional simulations and subsequent modal analysis using the bispectral mode decomposition, recently introduced by Schmidt (Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 102, issue 4, 2020, pp. 2479–2501). We find a pronounced destabilising effect of the viscosity stratification on both the onset of axisymmetric vortex breakdown and helical instability that is linked to the required shear stress continuity across the interface. Consequently, destabilisation is shifted to lower $S$ as compared with an equivalent flow with uniform viscosity. Further, the stability analysis reveals the simultaneous destabilisation of two global modes with wavenumbers $m=1$ and $m=2$ that have harmonic frequencies. The analysis of the nonlinear flow reveals a strong triadic resonance between these modes that governs the nonlinear dynamics and leads to a rapid departure from the linear dynamics. At larger swirl, the bifurcation of additional modes initiates an interaction cascade by means of triadic resonance which is elucidated by the bispectral analysis. It leads to the emergence of a variety of additional modes in the nonlinear flow. This study contributes to an improved understanding of the influence of viscosity stratification on the onset of vortex breakdown and the destabilisation of global modes. Further, it provides a clear picture of the dynamics of swirling flows with a codimension-two point and related triadic interaction of two global modes at harmonic frequencies and wavenumbers.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow Vortex Flows: Vortex breakdown
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 955 , 25 January 2023 , A24
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alligne, S., Nicolet, C., Tsujimoto, Y. & Avellan, F. 2014 Cavitation surge modelling in Francis turbine draft tube. J. Hydraul. Res. 52 (3), 399–411.Google Scholar
Barkley, D., Blackburn, H.M. & Sherwin, S.J. 2008 Direct optimal growth analysis for timesteppers. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 57 (9), 1435–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackbill, J.U., Kothe, D.B. & Zemach, C. 1992 A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comput. Phys. 100 (2), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaire, F., Ruith, M., Meiburg, E., Chomaz, J.-M. & Huerre, P. 2006 Spiral vortex breakdown as a global mode. J. Fluid Mech. 549, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, W.J. & Berger, S.A. 1976 Solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations for vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 75 (3), 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickox, C.E. 1971 Instability due to viscosity and density stratification in axisymmetric pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 14 (2), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, E.J. 1984 A note on the mechanism of the instability at the interface between two shearing fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 463–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, A.P. & Boyd, W.G.C. 1983 Shear-flow instability at the interface between two viscous fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hreiz, R., Gentric, C., Midoux, N., Lainé, R. & Fünfschilling, D. 2014 Hydrodynamics and velocity measurements in gas–liquid swirling flows in cylindrical cyclones. Chem. Engng Res. Des. 92 (11), 2231–2246.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.Google Scholar
Liang, H. & Maxworthy, T. 2005 An experimental investigation of swirling jets. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 115–159.Google Scholar
Litvinov, I., Yoon, J., Noren, C., Stöhr, M., Boxx, I. & Geigle, K.P. 2021 Time-resolved study of mixing and reaction in an aero-engine model combustor at increased pressure. Combust. Flame 231, 111474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucca-Negro, O. & O'doherty, T. 2001 Vortex breakdown: a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 27 (4), 431–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maly, M., Cejpek, O., Sapik, M., Ondracek, V., Wigley, G. & Jedelsky, J. 2021 Internal flow dynamics of spill-return pressure-swirl atomizers. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 120, 110210.Google Scholar
Manoharan, K., Hansford, S., O'Connor, J. & Hemchandra, S. 2015 Instability mechanism in a swirl flow combustor: precession of vortex core and influence of density gradient. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 56680, p. V04AT04A073. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meliga, P., Gallaire, F. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2012 A weakly nonlinear mechanism for mode selection in swirling jets. J. Fluid Mech. 699, 216–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczarski, L., Treleaven, N.C., Oberleithner, K., Schmidt, S., Fischer, A. & Kaiser, T.L. 2022 Interaction of multiple linear helical modes in the turbulent flow field of an industrial fuel injection system. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, p. 1061.Google Scholar
Müller, J.S., Sieber, M., Litvinov, I., Shtork, S., Alekseenko, S. & Oberleithner, K. 2021 Prediction of vortex precession in the draft tube of a model hydro turbine using mean field stability theory and stochastic modelling. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 774, p. 012003. IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
Oberleithner, K., Paschereit, C.O. & Wygnanski, I. 2014 On the impact of swirl on the growth of coherent structures. J. Fluid Mech. 741, 156–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberleithner, K., Sieber, M., Nayeri, C.N., Paschereit, C.O., Petz, C., Hege, H.-C., Noack, B.R. & Wygnanski, I. 2011 Three-dimensional coherent structures in a swirling jet undergoing vortex breakdown: stability analysis and empirical mode construction. J. Fluid Mech. 679, 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasche, S., Avellan, F. & Gallaire, F. 2017 Part load vortex rope as a global unstable mode. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 139 (5), 051102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasche, S., Avellan, F. & Gallaire, F. 2018 Onset of chaos in helical vortex breakdown at low Reynolds number. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (6), 064701.Google Scholar
Popinet, S. 2003 Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 190 (2), 572–600.Google Scholar
Popinet, S. 2009 An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (16), 5838–5866.Google Scholar
Popinet, S. 2018 Numerical models of surface tension. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qadri, U.A., Mistry, D. & Juniper, M.P. 2013 Structural sensitivity of spiral vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 720, 558–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, C.W., Mezić, I., Bagheri, S., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D.S. 2009 Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 641, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruith, M.R., Chen, P. & Meiburg, E. 2004 Development of boundary conditions for direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional vortex breakdown phenomena in semi-infinite domains. Comput. Fluids 33 (9), 1225–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruith, M.R., Chen, P., Meiburg, E. & Maxworthy, T. 2003 Three-dimensional vortex breakdown in swirling jets and wakes: direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 486, 331–378.Google Scholar
Rukes, L., Sieber, M., Paschereit, C.O. & Oberleithner, K. 2016 The impact of heating the breakdown bubble on the global mode of a swirling jet: experiments and linear stability analysis. Phys. Fluids 28 (10), 104102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardovelli, R. & Zaleski, S. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31 (1), 567–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P.J. 2010 Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, O.T. 2020 Bispectral mode decomposition of nonlinear flows. Nonlinear Dyn. 102 (4), 2479–2501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S., Tammisola, O., Lesshafft, L. & Oberleithner, K. 2021 Global stability and nonlinear dynamics of wake flows with a two-fluid interface. J. Fluid Mech. 915, A96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, M., Smereka, P. & Osher, S. 1994 A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 114 (1), 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammisola, O., Lundell, F. & Söderberg, L.D. 2012 Surface tension-induced global instability of planar jets and wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 713, 632–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammisola, O., Sasaki, A., Lundell, F., Matsubara, M. & Söderberg, L.D. 2011 Stabilizing effect of surrounding gas flow on a plane liquid sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 672, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuckerman, L.S. & Barkley, D. 2000 Bifurcation analysis for timesteppers. In Numerical Methods for Bifurcation Problems and Large-Scale Dynamical Systems, pp. 453–466. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanierschot, M., Müller, J.S., Sieber, M., Percin, M., van Oudheusden, B.W. & Oberleithner, K. 2020 Single-and double-helix vortex breakdown as two dominant global modes in turbulent swirling jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 883, A31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yih, C.-S. 1967 Instability due to viscosity stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 27 (2), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar