Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T10:20:30.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on gravity currents propagating down slopes. Part 2. The evolution of a fixed volume of fluid released from closed locks into a long, open channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

T. MAXWORTHY
T. MAXWORTHY*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 98009-1191, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: maxworth@usc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of experiments have been carried out on gravity currents released from locks of various dimensions into a sloping, open channel. Initially all the driving heads of the gravity currents grew by addition of heavier material from a following down-slope flow and by entrainment of ambient fluid, as in Maxworthy & Nokes (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 584, 2007, pp. 433–453). After propagating a distance of the order of 5–10 lock lengths the inflow into the rear stopped, and the head began to lose buoyancy-containing fluid from its rear by the detachment of large, weakly vortical structures. At the same time it was still entraining fluid over the majority of its surface so that its mean density was reduced. Measurements using a semi-direct method, in which dye concentration was used as a surrogate for density, have shown that the buoyancy in the current head increased during the first phase and decreased during the second. At no stage was the buoyancy constant except, of course, at the location and time at which the buoyancy was maximum with a magnitude significantly smaller than the initial value in the lock. Despite this the constant buoyancy theory of Beghin, Hopfinger & Britter (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 107, 1981, pp. 407–422), in which the head location x varies with time t as t2/3 during the later velocity-decay stage of the evolution, was found to be remarkably robust as a description of the evolution over both the latter part of the increasing-buoyancy stage and all of the decreasing-buoyancy phase. Critically, however, the multiplying coefficient had to be smaller than presented by them in order to track the experimental data with precision. This was due principally to the observation that the buoyancy at the beginning of the decay phase was considerably smaller than the initial buoyancy in the lock.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 647: Dedicated to Professor S. H. Davis on his 70th birthday , 25 March 2010 , pp. 27 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alavian, V. 1986 Behavior of density currents on an incline. J. Hydraul. Engng 112, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghin, P., Hopfinger, E. J. & Britter, R. E. 1981 Gravitational convection from instantaneous sources on inclined boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Battandier, B. A., Meiburg, E. & Linden, P. F. 2007 Lock-exchange flows in sloping channels. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britter, R.E. & Linden, P. F. 1980 The motion of the front of a gravity current traveling down an incline. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenedese, C. & Dalziel, S. B. 1998 Concentration and depth fields determined by the light transmitted through a dyed solution. In Eighth Intl. Symp. on Flow Visualization, Sorrento, Italy.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. H. & Turner, J. S. 1959 Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. & Tochon-Danguey, J. C. 1977 A model study of powder-snow avalanches. Glaciology 19 (81), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersey, D. G. & Hsu, K. J. 1976 Energy relations of density-current flow: an experimental investigation. Sedimentology 23, 761–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, A., Cremer, M., Beghin, P. & Ravenne, C. 1988 Density surges: two-dimensional experiments. Sedimentology 35, 73–84.Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Schlapfer, D. & Buhler, J. 1991 Motion of dense thermals on incline. J. Hydraul. Engng 117, 1588–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthi, S. 1991 Some new aspects of two-dimensional turbidity currents. Sedimentology 28, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxworthy, T. & Nokes, R. I. 2007 Experiments on gravity currents propagating down slopes. Part 1. The effects of initial conditions on the release of a fixed volume of heavy fluid from an enclosed lock into an open channel. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastello, M. & Hopfinger, E. J. 2004 Sediment-entraining suspension clouds: a model of powder-snow avalanches. J. Fluid Mech. 509, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seon, T., Znaien, J., Perrin, B., Hinch, E. J., Salin, D. & Hulin, J. P. 2007 Front dynamics and macroscopic diffusion in buoyant mixing in tilted tubes. Phys. Fluids 19, 125105.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1987 Gravity currents in the environment and the laboratory, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tickle, G. A. 1996 A model of the motion and dilution of a heavy gas cloud released on a uniform slope in calm conditions. J. Haz. Mat. 49 (1), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tochon-Danguey, J. C. 1977 Etude des courant de gravite sur fort pente avec application aux avalanches poudreuse. Thesis, L'Universite Scientifique et Medicale de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Webber, D. M., Jones, S. J., & Martin, D. 1993 A model of the motion of a heavy gas cloud released on a uniform slope, J. Haz Mat. 33 (1), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar