Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Energetic scales in a bluff body shear layer

  • D. M. Moore (a1), C. W. Letchford (a2) and M. Amitay (a1)

Abstract

A detailed experimental campaign into separated shear layers stemming from rectangular sections (having aspect ratios of 5 : 1, 3 : 1 and 1 : 1) was carried out at Reynolds numbers range between $1.34\times 10^{4}$ and $1.18\times 10^{5}$ based on the body thickness. Particle image velocimetry was used to locate the highest concentration of fluctuations in the velocity field and subsequent hot-wire measurements at those locations provided adequate spectral resolution to follow the evolution of various instabilities that are active within the separated shear layer. Similar to recent findings by this same group, the shear layer behaviour is observed to contain a combination of Reynolds invariant characteristics, including its time-averaged position, while other properties demonstrate clear Reynolds number dependency, including the spatial amplification of turbulent kinetic energy. Additional results here show that the ratio of side lengths of the body is a key parameter in revealing these effects. One reason for this is the level of coupling between modes of instability, which is evaluated using two-point correlation methods. These findings indicate that the separated shear layer on a bluff body is highly nonlinear. A specific set of scales responsible for these unique behaviours is identified and discussed, along with their relationship to other scales in the flow.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: amitam@rpi.edu

References

Hide All
Achenbach, E. 1971 Influence of surface roughness on the cross-flow around a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 46 (2), 321335.
Akon, A. F. & Kopp, G. A. 2018 Turbulence structure and similarity in the separated flow above a low building in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 182 (April), 87100.
Bandyopadhyay, P. R. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1984 The coupling between scales in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 27 (9), 22212228.
Bartoli, G., Bruno, L., Buresti, G., Ricciardelli, F., Salvetti, M. V. & Zasso, A.2008 BARC overview document. Available at: http://www.aniv-iawe.org/barc.
Bearman, P. W. & Morel, T. 1983 Effect of free stream turbulence on the flow around bluff bodies. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 20 (2–3), 97123.
Bloor, S. M. 1964 The transition to turbulence in the wake of a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 19 (02), 290304.
Brown, G. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775816.
Bruno, L., Fransos, D., Coste, N. & Bosco, A. 2010 3D flow around a rectangular cylinder: a computational study. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 98, 263276.
Bruno, L., Salvetti, M. V. & Ricciardelli, F. 2014 Benchmark on the aerodynamics of a rectangular 5 : 1 cylinder: an overview after the first four years of activity. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 126, 87106.
Cantwell, B. & Coles, D. 1983 An experimental study of entrainment and transport in the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 136, 321374.
Carter, D. W. & Coletti, F. 2018 Small-scale structure and energy transfer in homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 854, 505543.
Castro, I. P. & Haque, A. 1987 The structure of a turbulent shear layer bounding a separation region. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 439468.
Christensen, K. T. & Scarano, F. 2015 Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 26 (7), 68.
Fiedler, E. 1991 The spatially accelerated mixing layer in a tailored pressure gradient. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 10 (4), 349376.
Ho, C. M. & Huerre, P. 1984 Perturbed free shear layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365424.
Huerre, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1990 Local and global instabilities in spatially developing flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 473537.
Hultgren, L. S. & Aggarwal, A. K. 1987 Absolute instability of the Gaussian wake profile. Phys. Fluids 30 (11), 33833388.
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365 (1852), 647664.
Lander, D. C.2017 Influence of freestream and forced disturbances on the shear layers of a square prism. PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Lander, D. C., Moore, D. M., Letchford, C. W. & Amitay, M. 2018 Scaling of square-prism shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 849, 10961119.
Mannini, C., Šoda, A. & Schewe, G. 2010 Computers & fluids unsteady RANS modelling of flow past a rectangular cylinder: investigation of Reynolds number effects. Comput. Fluids 39 (9), 16091624.
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311337.
Matsumoto, M. 1999 Vortex shedding of bluff bodies: a review. J. Fluids Struct. 13 (7-8), 791811.
Melbourne, W. H. 1979 Turbulence effects on maximum surface pressures – a mechanism and possibility of reduction. In Fifth International Conference on Wind Engineering, pp. 541551. Pergamon Press.
Michalke, A. 1965 On spatially growing disturbance in an inviscid shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 521544.
Monkewitz, P. A. 1982 Influence of the velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 25 (7), 11371143.
Morrison, M. J. & Kopp, G. A. 2018 Effects of turbulence intensity and scale on surface pressure fluctuations on the roof of a low-rise building in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 183 (June), 140151.
Morton, B. R. 1984 The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 28 (3–4), 277308.
Neal, D. R., Sciacchitano, A., Smith, B. L. & Scarano, F. 2015 Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: the experimental database. Meas. Sci. Technol. 26 (7), 117.
Norberg, C. 1993 Flow around rectangular cylinders: pressure forces and wake frequencies. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 49, 187196.
Okajima, A. 1982 Strouhal numbers of rectangular cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 379398.
Prasad, A. & Williamson, C. H. K. 1997 The instability of the shear layer separating from a bluff body. J. Fluid Mech. 333, 375402.
Prosser, D. T. & Smith, M. J. 2016 Numerical characterization of three-dimensional bluff body shear layer behaviour. J. Fluid Mech. 799, 126.
Roshko, A.1954 On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. Tech. Rep. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington.
Sato, H. 1956 Experimental investigation on the transition of laminar separated layer. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 11 (6), 702709.
Schewe, G. 2013 Reynolds-number-effects in flow around a rectangular cylinder with aspect ratio 1 : 5. J. Fluids Struct. 39, 1526.
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.
Sciacchitano, A. & Wieneke, B. 2016 PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 (8), 116.
Shimada, K. & Ishihara, T. 2002 Application of a modified ke model to the prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of rectangular cross-section cylinders. J. Fluids Struct. 16 (15), 399413.
Sigurdson, L. W.1986 The structure and control of a turbulent reattaching flow. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Tieleman, H. W. 2003 Wind tunnel simulation of wind loading on low-rise structures: a review. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (12–15), 16271649.
Trias, F. X., Gorobets, A. & Oliva, A. 2015 Turbulent flow around a square cylinder at Reynolds number 22 000: a DNS study. Comput. Fluids 123 (22), 8798.
Unal, M. F. & Rockwell, D. 1988 On vortex formation from a cylinder. Part 1. The initial instability. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 491512.
Winant, C. D. & Browand, F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63 (02), 237255.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Energetic scales in a bluff body shear layer

  • D. M. Moore (a1), C. W. Letchford (a2) and M. Amitay (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed