Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:15:30.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Droplet drag in an accelerating and decelerating flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

S. Temkin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, U.S.A.
H. K. Mehta
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, U.S.A. Present address: Boeing Commercial Airplane Co., Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

Abstract

An experimental study of the motion of small water droplets in both accelerating and decelerating conditions is presented. Droplets with diameters in the range 115-187μm were exposed to propagating N-waves having strengths smaller than 0.03. Droplet-displacement data were obtained by single-frame stroboscopic photography, at an equivalent framing rate of 4000 pictures per second. The data were fitted by means of best-fit polynomials in time, which were used to obtain drag coefficients in accelerating and decelerating flow conditions. In addition to providing drag data for impulsive-type motions, these data show that the unsteady drag follows two entirely distinct trends. In one, applicable to decelerating relative flows, the unsteady drag is always larger than the steady drag at the same Reynolds number. In the other, applicable to accelerating relative flows, the unsteady drag is always smaller than the corresponding steady value. These trends have not been previously known. They give some support to a mechanism recently proposed (see Temkin & Kim 1980) to explain departures of the drag coefficient for a sphere from its steady value; namely, the changes in size of the recirculating region behind the sphere, relative to its steady counterpart at the same Reynolds number.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clift, R., Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, chap. 11. Academic.
Hill, M. K. 1973 Behavior of spherical particles at low Reynolds numbers in a fluctuating translational flow. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Ingebo, R. D. 1956 Drag coefficients for droplets and solid spheres in clouds accelerating in air streams. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note TN 3762.
Karanfilian, S. K. & Kotas, T. J. 1978 Drag on a sphere in unsteady motion in a liquid at rest. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 8596.Google Scholar
Kim, S. S. 1977 An experimental study of droplet response to weak shock waves. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Lamb, H. 1925 The Dynamical Theory of Sound. Dover.
Lunnon, R. G. 1926 Fluid resistance to moving spheres. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 110, 302326.Google Scholar
Mehta, H. K. 1980 Droplet drag and breakup in shock-wave induced unsteady flows. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Odar, F. & Hamilton, W. S. 1964 Forces on a sphere accelerating in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 302314.Google Scholar
Reichman, J. M. 1973 A study of the motion. deformation and breakup of accelerating water droplets. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Roos, F. W. & Willmarth, W. W. 1971 Some experimental results on sphere and disk drag. A.I.A.A. J. 9, 285291.Google Scholar
Rudinger, G. 1974 Effective drag coefficients for gas-particle flow in shock tubes. Trans. A.S.M.E. D, J. Basic Engng 94, 8188.Google Scholar
Selberg, B. P. & Nicholls, J. A. 1968 Drag coefficient of small spherical particles. A.I.A.A. J. 6, 401408.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. & Kim, S. S. 1980 Droplet motion induced by weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 133157.Google Scholar
Torobin, L. B. & Gauvin, W. H. 1959 Fundamental aspects of solids-gas flows. III. Accelerated motion of a particle in a fluid. Can. J. Chem. Engng 37, 224236.Google Scholar