Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition by unsteady control vortices

  • Zhengfei Guo (a1) and Markus J. Kloker (a1)

Abstract

The fundamental mechanisms of a hitherto unstudied approach to control the crossflow-induced transition in a three-dimensional boundary layer employing unsteady control vortices are investigated by means of direct numerical simulations. Using a spanwise row of blowing/suction or volume-force actuators, subcritical travelling crossflow vortex modes are excited to impose a stabilizing (upstream) flow deformation (UFD). Volume forcing mimics the effects of alternating current plasma actuators driven by a low-frequency sinusoidal signal. In this case the axes of the actuators are aligned with the wave crests of the desired travelling mode to maximize receptivity and abate the influence of other unwanted, misaligned modes. The resulting travelling crossflow vortices generate a beneficial mean-flow distortion reducing the amplification rate of naturally occurring steady or unsteady crossflow modes without invoking significant secondary instabilities. It is found that the stabilizing effect achieved by travelling control modes is somewhat weaker than that achieved by the steady modes in the classical UFD method. However, the energy requirements for unsteady-UFD plasma actuators would be significantly lower than for steady UFD because the approach makes full use of the inherent unsteadiness of the plasma-induced volume force with alternating-current-driven actuators. Also, the input control amplitude can be lower since unsteady crossflow vortex modes grow stronger in the flow.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition by unsteady control vortices
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition by unsteady control vortices
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition by unsteady control vortices
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: kloker@iag.uni-stuttgart.de

References

Hide All
Barckmann, K., Tropea, C. & Grundmann, S. 2015 Attenuation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves using plasma actuator vortex generators. AIAA J. 53, 13841387.
Barth, H. P., Hein, S. & Rosemann, H. 2017 Redesigned swept flat-plate experiment for crossflow-induced transition studies. In New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Dynamics XI. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Springer.
Benard, N. & Moreau, E. 2014 Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control. Exp. Fluids 55, 1846.
Bippes, H. 1999 Basic experiments on transition in three-dimensional boundary layers dominated by crossflow instability. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 35, 363412.
Bonfigli, G. & Kloker, M. 1999 Spatial Navier–Stokes simulation of crossflow-induced transition in a three-dimensional boundary layer. In New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics II: Contributions to the 11th AG STAB/DGLR Symposium, Berlin, Germany, 1998, pp. 6168. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.
Bonfigli, G. & Kloker, M.2005 Numerical investigation of transition caused by superposed steady and travelling crossflow vortices. Tech. Rep. IAG-TR-2005-CFTRANS. University of Stuttgart, Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics.
Bonfigli, G. & Kloker, M. 2007 Secondary instability of crossflow vortices: validation of the stability theory by direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 583, 229272.
Borodulin, V. I., Ivanov, A. V. & Kachanov, Y. S. 2017 Swept-wing boundary-layer transition at various external perturbations: scenarios, criteria, and problems of prediction. Phys. Fluids 29 (9), 094101.
Borodulin, V. I., Ivanov, A. V., Kachanov, Y. S. & Hanifi, A. 2016 Laminar–turbulent transition delay on a swept wing. AIP Conf. Proc. 1770 (1), 030065.
Chernyshev, S. L., Gamirullin, M. D., Khomich, V. Y., Kuryachii, A. P., Litinov, V. M., Manuilovich, S. V., Moshkunov, S. I., Rebrov, I. E., Rusyanov, D. A. & Yamshchikov, V. A. 2016 Electrogasdynamic laminar flow control on a swept wing. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 59, 155161.
Choi, K.-S. & Kim, J.-H. 2018 Plasma virtual roughness elements for cross-flow instability control. Exp. Fluids 59, 159.
Dörr, P. C. & Kloker, M. J. 2015a Numerical investigation of plasma-actuator force-term estimations from flow experiments. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 395203.
Dörr, P. C. & Kloker, M. J. 2015b Stabilisation of a three-dimensional boundary layer by base-flow manipulation using plasma actuators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 285205.
Dörr, P. C. & Kloker, M. J. 2016 Transition control in a three-dimensional boundary layer by direct attenuation of nonlinear crossflow vortices using plasma actuators. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 61, 449465.
Dörr, P. C. & Kloker, M. J. 2017 Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 063303.
Dörr, P. C. & Kloker, M. J. 2018 Numerical investigations on Tollmien–Schlichting-wave attenuation using plasma actuator vortex generators. AIAA J. 56, 13051309.
Downs, R. S. & White, E. B. 2013 Free-stream turbulence and the development of cross-flow disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 735, 347380.
Friederich, T. & Kloker, M. J. 2012 Control of the secondary cross-flow instability using localized suction. J. Fluid Mech. 706, 470495.
Gregory, N., Stuart, J. T. & Walker, W. S. 1955 On the stability of three-dimensional boundary layers with application to the flow due to a rotating disk. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 248, 155199.
Grundmann, S. & Tropea, C. 2007 Experimental transition delay using glow-discharge plasma actuators. Exp. Fluids 42, 653657.
Grundmann, S. & Tropea, C. 2008 Active cancellation of artificially introduced Tollmien–Schlichting waves using plasma actuators. Exp. Fluids 44, 795806.
Hanson, R. E., Bade, K. M., Belson, B. A., Lavoie, P., Naguib, A. M. & Rowley, C. W. 2014 Feedback control of slowly-varying transient growth by an array of plasma actuators. Phys. Fluids 26, 024102.
Hosseini, S. M., Tempelmann, D., Hanifi, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2013 Stabilization of a swept-wing boundary layer by distributed roughness elements. J. Fluid Mech. 718, R1.
Ivanov, A. V., Mischenko, D. A. & Ustinov, M. V. 2018 Experimental investigation of laminar–turbulent transition control on swept-wing with help of oblique surface non-uniformities. AIP Conf. Proc. 2027 (1), 030152.
Joslin, R. D. 1998a Aircraft laminar flow control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 129.
Joslin, R. D.1998b Overview of laminar flow control. NASA Tech. Rep. TP-1998-208705. NASA Langley Research Center.
Kotsonis, M. 2015 Diagnostics for characterisation of plasma actuators. Meas. Sci. Technol. 26, 092001.
Kotsonis, M., Giepmann, R., Hulshoff, S. & Veldhuis, L. 2013 Numerical study of the control of Tollmien–Schlichting waves using plasma actuators. AIAA J. 51, 23532364.
Kriegseis, J., Simon, B. & Grundmann, S. 2016 Towards in-flight applications? A review on dielectric barrier discharge-based boundary-layer control. Appl. Mech. Rev. 68, 020802.
Kurz, A., Tropea, C., Grundmann, S., Forte, M., Vermeersch, O., Seraudie, A., Arnal, D., Goldin, N. & King, R.2012 Transition delay using DBD plasma actuators in direct frequency mode. AIAA Paper 2012-2945.
Li, F., Choudhari, M. M., Duan, L. & Chang, C.-L. 2014 Nonlinear development and secondary instability of traveling crossflow vortices. Phys. Fluids 26, 064104.
Lohse, J., Barth, H. P. & Nitsche, W. 2016 Active control of crossflow-induced transition by means of in-line pneumatic actuator orifices. Exp. Fluids 57, 124.
Maden, I., Maduta, R., Kriegseis, J., Jakirlić, S., Schwarz, C., Grundmann, S. & Tropea, C. 2013 Experimental and computational study of the flow induced by a plasma actuator. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 41, 8089.
Messing, R. & Kloker, M. J. 2010 Investigation of suction for laminar flow control of three-dimensional boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 117147.
Riherd, M. & Roy, S. 2013 Damping Tollmien–Schlichting waves in a boundary layer using plasma actuators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 485203.
Riherd, M. & Roy, S. 2014 Stabilization of boundary layer streaks by plasma actuators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 125203.
Saric, W. S. Jr., Carrillo, R. B. & Reibert, M. S. 1998 Leading-edge roughness as a transition control mechanism. AIAA Paper 98-0781.
Saric, W. S., Reed, H. L. & White, E. B. 2003 Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 413440.
Schuele, C. Y., Corke, T. C. & Matlis, E. 2013 Control of stationary cross-flow modes in a Mach 3.5 boundary layer using patterned passive and active roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 718, 538.
Serpieri, J. & Kotsonis, M. 2016 Three-dimensional organisation of primary and secondary crossflow instability. J. Fluid Mech. 799, 200245.
Serpieri, J., Yadala Venkata, S. & Kotsonis, M. 2017 Conditioning of cross-flow instability modes using dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 833, 164205.
Shahriari, N., Kollert, M. R. & Hanifi, A. 2018 Control of a swept-wing boundary layer using ring-type plasma actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 844, 3660.
Wang, Z., Wang, L. & Fu, S. 2017 Control of stationary crossflow modes in swept Hiemenz flows with dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. Phys. Fluids 29, 094105.
Wassermann, P. & Kloker, M. 2002 Mechanisms and passive control of crossflow-vortex-induced transition in a three-dimensional boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 456, 4984.
Wassermann, P. & Kloker, M. 2003 Transition mechanisms induced by travelling crossflow vortices in a three-dimensional boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 483, 6789.
Yadala, S., Hehner, M. T., Serpieri, J., Benard, N., Dörr, P. C., Kloker, M. J. & Kotsonis, M. 2018 Experimental control of swept-wing transition through base-flow modification by plasma actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 844, R2.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed