Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T00:10:44.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the interactions of two unequal co-rotating vortices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

LAURA K. BRANDT
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411, USA
KEIKO K. NOMURA*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: knomura@ucsd.edu

Abstract

The interactions and merging of two unequal co-rotating vortices in a viscous fluid are investigated. Two-dimensional numerical simulations of initially equal-sized vortices with differing relative strengths are performed. In the case of equal-strength vortices, i.e. symmetric vortex pairs (Brandt & Nomura, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 592, 2007, pp. 413–446), the mutually induced strain deforms and tilts the vortices, which leads to a core detrainment process. The weakened vortices are mutually entrained and rapidly move towards each other as they intertwine and destruct. The flow thereby develops into a single compound vortex. With unequal strengths, i.e. asymmetric pairs, the disparity of the vortices alters the interaction. Merger may result from reciprocal but unequal entrainment, which yields a compound vortex; however other outcomes are possible. The various interactions are classified based on the relative timing of core detrainment and core destruction of the vortices. Through scaling analysis and simulation results, a critical strain rate parameter which characterizes the establishment of core detrainment is identified and determined. The onset of merging is associated with the achievement of the critical strain rate by ‘both’ vortices, and a merging criterion is thereby developed. In the case of symmetric pairs, the critical strain rate parameter is shown to be related to the critical aspect ratio. In contrast with symmetric merger, which is in essence a flow transformation, asymmetric merger may result in the domination of the stronger vortex because of the unequal deformation rates. If the disparity of the vortex strengths is sufficiently large, the critical strain rate is not attained by the stronger vortex before destruction of the weaker vortex, and the vortices do not merge.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bewley, T. R. 2010 Numerical Renaissance: Simulation, Optimization, and Control. http://numerical-renaissance.com/Diablo.html, Renaissance.Google Scholar
Brandt, L. K. & Nomura, K. K. 2006 The physics of vortex merger: further insight. Phys. Fluids 18, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L. K. & Nomura, K. K. 2007 The physics of vortex merger and the effects of ambient stable stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 413446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerretelli, C. & Williamson, C. H. K. 2003 The physical mechanism for vortex merging. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 4177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Waugh, D. W. 1992 Quantification of the inelastic interaction of unequal vortices in two-dimensional vortex dynamics. Phys. Fluids 4, 17371744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenstein, U. & Rossi, M. 1999 Equilibria of corotating non-uniform vortices. Phys. Fluids 11, 3416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1987 Coalescing of geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 7397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, M. J. 2005 The physical mechanism of symmetric vortex merger: a new viewpoint. Phys. Fluids 17, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, S. 1981 Motion of an elliptic vortex in a uniform shear flow. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 50, 3517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Y. & Herring, J. R. 2001 Gradient enhancement and filament ejection for a non-uniform elliptic vortex in two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 4356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dizes, S. & Verga, A. 2002 Viscous interactions of two co-rotating vortices before merging. J. Fluid Mech. 467, 389410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legras, B. & Dritschel, D. G. 1993 Vortex stripping and the generation of high vorticity gradients in two-dimensional flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariotti, A., Legras, B. & Dritschel, D. G. 1994 Vortex stripping and the erosion of coherent structures in two-dimension flows. Phys. Fluids. 120, 12671297.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., McWilliams, J. C. & Zabusky, N. J. 1987 Asymmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: which vortex is ‘victorious’? Phys. Fluids 30, 26102612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: causes and conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 305340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, P. 2001 Etude experimentale de deux tourbillons co-rotatifs. PhD dissertation, Universite d'Aix-Marseille I, France.Google Scholar
Meunier, P., Ehrenstein, U., Leweke, T. & Rossi, M. 2002 A merging criterion for two-dimensional co-rotating vortices. Phys. Fluids 14, 27572766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, P. & Leweke, T. 2001 Three-dimensional instability during vortex merging. Phys. Fluids 13, 27472750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. B. & Driscoll, C. F. 1996 Electron vortex orbits and merger. Phys. Fluids 8, 18281841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Evolution and merger of isolated vortex structures. Phys. Fluids 25, 12971305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossow, V. J. 1977 Convective merging of vortex cores in lift-generated wakes. J. Aircr. 14, 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. & Szeto, R. 1980 Equilibrium shapes of a pair of equal uniform vortices. Phys. Fluids 23, 23392342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trieling, R. R., Velasco Fuentes, O. U. & van Heijst, G. J. F. 2005 Interaction of two unequal corotating vortices. Phys. Fluids 17, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco Fuentes, O. U. 2005 Vortex filamentation: its onset and its role on axisymmetrization and merger. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 40, 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar