Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T23:01:08.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Axisymmetric particle-driven gravity currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Roger T. Bonnecaze ,
Mark A. Hallworth ,
Herbert E. Huppert  and
John R. Lister
Roger T. Bonnecaze
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1062, USA
Mark A. Hallworth
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Herbert E. Huppert
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
John R. Lister
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Axisymmetric gravity currents that result when a dense suspension intrudes under a lighter ambient fluid are studied theoretically and experimentally. The dynamics of and deposition from currents flowing over a rigid horizontal surface are determined for the release of either a fixed volume or a constant flux of a suspension. The dynamics of the current are assumed to be dominated by inertial and buoyancy forces, while viscous forces are assumed to be negligible. The fluid motion is modelled by the single-layer axisymmetric shallow-water equations, which neglect the effects of the overlying fluid. An advective transport equation models the distribution of particles in the current, and this distribution determines the local buoyancy force in the shallow-water equations. The transport equation is derived on the assumption that the particles are vertically well-mixed by the turbulence in the current, are advected by the mean flow and settle out through a viscous sublayer at the bottom of the current. No adjustable parameters are needed to specify the theoretical model. The coupled equations of the model are solved numerically, and it is predicted that after an early stage both constant-volume and constant-flux, particle-driven gravity currents develop an internal bore which separates a supercritical particle-free region upstream from a subcritical particle-rich region downstream near the head of the current. For the fixed-volume release, an earlier bore is also predicted to occur very shortly after the initial collapse of the current. This bore transports suspended particles away from the origin, which results in a maximum in the predicted deposition away from the centre.

To test the model several laboratory experiments were performed to determine both the radius of an axisymmetric particle-driven gravity current as a function of time and its deposition pattern for a variety of initial particle concentrations, particle sizes, volumes and flow rates. For the release of a fixed volume and of a constant flux of suspension, the comparisons between the experimental results and the theoretical predictions are fairly good. However, for the current of fixed volume, we did not observe the bore predicted to occur shortly after the collapse of the current or the resulting maximum in deposition downstream of the origin. This is unlike the previous study of Bonnecaze et al. (1993) on two-dimensional currents, in which a strong bore was observed during the slumping phase. The radial extent R of the deposit from a fixed-volume current is accurately predicted by the model, and for currents whose particles settle sufficiently slowly, we find that R = 1.9(g′0V3 / v2s)1/8, where V is the volume of the current, vs is the settling velocity of a particle in the suspension and g’0 is the initial reduced gravity of the suspension.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 294 , 10 July 1995 , pp. 93 - 121
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 223–240.Google Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 1993 Particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 339–369 (referred to herin as BHL).Google Scholar
Chen, J. C. 1980 Studies on gravitational spreading currents. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Dade, W. B. & Huppert, H. E. 1994 Predicting the geometry of deep-sea channelized turbidites. Geology 22, 645–648.Google Scholar
Dade, W. B. & Huppert, H. E. 1995 Runout and fine-sediment deposits of axisymmetric turbidity currents. J. Geophys. Res. (Oceans), sub judice.Google Scholar
Einstein, H. A. 1968 Deposition of suspended particles in a gravel bed. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 94, 1197–1205.Google Scholar
Gratton, J. & Vigo, C. 1994 Self-similar gravity currents with variable inflow revisited: plane currents. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 77–104.Google Scholar
Grundy, R. E. & Rottman, J. W. 1986 Self-similar solutions of the shallow-water equations representing gravity currents with variable inflow. J. Fluid Mech. 169, 337–351.Google Scholar
Hay, A. E. 1987 Turbidity currents and submarine channel formation in Rupert Inlet, British Columbia, 1. Surge observations. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 2875–2881.Google Scholar
Hoult, D. P. 1972 Oil spreading on the sea. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 341–368.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1982 The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43–58.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Simpson, J. E. 1980 The slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 785–799.Google Scholar
Inman, D.L., Nordstrom, C.E. & Flick, R.E. 1976 Currents in submarine canyons: an air-sea-land interaction. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 275–3109.Google Scholar
KáRMáN, T. VON 1940 The engineer grapples with nonlinear problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 615–683.Google Scholar
Martin, D. & Nokes, R. 1988 Crystal settling in a vigorously convecting magma chamber. Nature 332, 534–536.Google Scholar
Martin, D. & Nokes, R. 1989 A fluid-dynamical study of crystal settling in convecting magmas. J. Petrol. 30, 1471–1500.Google Scholar
Mccave, I.N. 1970 Deposition of fine grained suspended sediment from tidal currents. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4151–4159.Google Scholar
Normark, W.R. & Dickson, F.H. 1976 Man-made turbidity currents in Lake Superior. Sedimentology 23, 815–831.Google Scholar
Perrodon, A. 1985 Dynamics of oil and gas accumulation. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production, Elf-Aquitaine, Pau, France, pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1987 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory. Ellis Horwood.
Sparks, R. S. J., Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E., Lister, J. R., Mader, H. & Phillips, J. 1993 Sediment-laden gravity currents with reversing buoyancy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 114, 243–257Google Scholar
Sparks, R.S.J. & Walker, G.P.L. 1977 The significance of vitric-enriched air-fall ashes associated with crystal-enriched ignimbrites. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2, 329–341.Google Scholar
Whitham, G.B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves, p. 456. John Wiley & Sons.