Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:50:39.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Algebraically decaying modes and wave packet pseudo-modes in swept Hiemenz flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

DOMINIK OBRIST*
Affiliation:
Institute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
PETER J. SCHMID
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Hydrodynamique (LadHyX), CNRS-École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
*
Email address for correspondence: obrist@ifd.mavt.ethz.ch

Abstract

The modal structure of the swept Hiemenz flow, a model for the flow near the attachment line of a swept wing, consists of eigenfunctions which exhibit (super-)exponential or algebraic decay as the wall-normal coordinate tends to infinity. The subset of algebraically decaying modes corresponds to parts of the spectrum which are characterized by a significant sensitivity to numerical discretization. Numerical evidence further suggests that a continuous spectrum covering a two-dimensional range of the complex plane exists. We investigate the family of uniform swept Hiemenz modes using eigenvalue computations, numerical simulations and the concept of wave packet pseudo-modes. Three distinct branches of the family of algebraically decaying eigenmodes are identified. They can be superimposed to produce wavefronts propagating towards or away from the boundary layer and standing or travelling wave packets in the free stream. Their role in the exchange of information between the free stream and the attachment-line boundary layer for the swept Hiemenz flow is discussed. The concept of wave packet pseudo-modes has been critical in the analysis of this problem and is expected to lead to further insights into other shear flows in semi- or bi-infinite domains.

JFM classification

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bender, C. M. & Orszag, S. A. 1978 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Brattkus, K. & Davis, S. H. 1991 The linear stability of plane stagnation-point flow against general disturbances. Quart. J. Mech. appl. Math. 44 (1), 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanak, M. R. & Stuart, J. T. 1995 Distortion of the stagnation-point flow due to cross-stream vorticity in the external flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 352, 443452.Google Scholar
Görtler, H. 1941 Instabilität laminarer Grenzschichten an konkaven Wänden gegenüber gewissen dreidimensionalen Störungen. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 21, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosch, C. E. & Salwen, H. 1978 The continuous spectrum of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. Part 1. The spectrum and the eigenfunctions. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 3354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. & Malik, M. R. 1986 On the instability of a three-dimensional attachment-line boundary layer: weakly nonlinear theory and a numerical approach. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 257282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P., Malik, M. R. & Poll, D. I. A. 1984 On the stability of an infinite swept attachment line boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 395, 229245.Google Scholar
Hämmerlin, G. 1955 Zur Instabilitätstheorie der ebenen Staupunktströmung. In 50 Jahre Grenzschichtforschung (ed. Görtler, H. & Tollmien, W.), p. 315. Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestin, J. & Wood, R. T. 1970 On the stability of a two-dimensional stagnation flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 461479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R.-S. & Malik, M. R. 1996 On the stability of attachment-line boundary layers. Part 1. The incompressible swept Hiemenz flow. J. Fluid Mech. 311, 239255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyell, M. J. & Huerre, P. 1985 Linear and nonlinear stability of plane stagnation flow. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 295312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrist, D. 2000 On the stability of the swept leading-edge boundary layer. PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Obrist, D. & Schmid, P. J. 2003 a On the linear stability of swept attachment-line boundary layer flow. Part 1. Spectrum and asymptotic behaviour. J. Fluid Mech. 493, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrist, D. & Schmid, P. J. 2003 b On the linear stability of swept attachment-line boundary layer flow. Part 2. Non-modal effects and receptivity. J. Fluid Mech. 493, 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrist, D. & Schmid, P. J. 2009 Wave packet pseudomodes upstream of a swept cylinder. In Seventh IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Salwen, H. & Grosch, C. E. 1981 The continuous spectrum of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. Part 2. Eigenfunction expansions. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 445465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988 Direct numerical study of leading-edge contamination. In Proceedings of the AGARD Symposium on Application of Direct and Large Eddy Simulation to Transition and Turbulence, AGARD, CP-438, pp. 5-1–5-13.Google Scholar
Theofilis, V. 1998 On linear and nonlinear instability of the incompressible swept attachment-line boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 355, 193227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trefethen, L. N. 2005 Wave packet pseudomodes of variable coefficient differential operators. Proc. R. Soc. A 461 (2062), 30993122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trefethen, L. N. & Embree, M. 2005 Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behaviour of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. D. R. & Gladwell, I. 1978 The stability of a two-dimensional stagnation flow to three-dimensional disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 517527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar