Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T07:30:21.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reopening of a collapsed fluid-filled elastic tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2007

ANNE JUEL  and
ALEXANDRA HEAP
ANNE JUEL
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UKanne.juel@manchester.ac.uk
ALEXANDRA HEAP
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UKanne.juel@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present an experimental study of the reopening mechanics of a collapsed liquid-filled elastic tube. The experiment is a simple mechanical model of pulmonary airway reopening and aims to assess the robustness of existing theoretical models. A metre-long horizontal elastic tube of inner radius Ri=4.88 ± 0.14mm is filled with silicone oil and is carefully collapsed mechanically. The injection of nitrogen at a constant flow rate results in the steady propagation of an air finger, after the decay of initial transients. This behaviour is observed over the realizable range of the capillary numbers Ca, which measures the ratio of viscous and capillary forces. With increasing Ca, the transition region between the collapsed and reopened sections of the tube shortens, and the height of the tube behind the bubble tip increases. We also find that air fingers can propagate in partially reopened tubes, in which the transmural pressure is negative far behind the finger tip.

The effect of viscosity on the reopening dynamics was explored by performing experiments using three different grades of silicone oil, with kinematic viscosities of 1000cS, 200cS and 100cS. A direct comparison between the experimental pressure dependence on Ca and numerical simulations of the zero-gravity three-dimensional airway-reopening model of Hazel & Heil (Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Engng, vol. 128, 2006, p. 473) highlights some significant differences. Within the experimental parameter range, gravity profoundly influences the reopening mechanics in several ways. The reopening tube is supported by a rigid base, which induces an asymmetry about the horizontal mid-plane of the collapsed tube, resulting in distinct phases of reopening as Ca increases. In addition, buoyancy forces act on the air finger, which is observed to propagate near the top of the cross-section of the tube, leaving a thicker fluid-lining below. In the limit of small Ca, the height of the reopened tube increases significantly with viscosity. Experimental evidence suggests that this increase in viscosity leads to significant changes in the film configuration behind the propagating finger, caused by the increased contribution of buoyancy forces. The altered film configuration changes the mechanical load on the tube walls and, hence, the shape of the reopened tube.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 572 , February 2007 , pp. 287 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Flaherty, J. E., Keller, J. B. & Rubinow, S. I. 1972 Post-buckling behaviour of elastic tubes and rings with opposite sides in contact. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 23, 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver III, D. P., Halpern, D., Jensen, O. E. & Grotberg, J. B. 1996 The steady motion of a semi-infinite bubble through a flexible-walled channel. J. Fluid Mech. 319, 25–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver III, D. P., Samsel, R. W. & Solway, J. 1990 Effects of surface tension and viscosity on airway reopening. J. Appl. Physiol. 69, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotberg, J. B. 2001 Respiratory fluid mechanics and transport processes. Annu. Rev. Biomech. Eng. 3, 421–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. & Grotberg, J. B. 1992 Fluid-elastic instabilities of liquid-lined flexible tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 244, 615–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D., Jensen, O. E. & Grotberg, J. B. 1998 A theoretical study of surfactant and liquid delivery into the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 85, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D., Naire, S., Jensen, O. E. & Gaver III, D. P. 2005 Unsteady bubble propagation in a flexible channel: predictions of a viscous stick-slip instability. J. Fluid Mech. 528, 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, A. L. & Heil, M. 2003 Three-dimensional airway reopening: The steady propagation of a semi-infinite bubble into a buckled elastic tube. J. Fluid Mech. 478, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, A. L. & Heil, M. 2005 Surface-tension-induced buckling of liquid-lined elastic tubes: a model for pulmonary airway closure. Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 1847–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, A. L. & Heil, M. 2006 Finite Reynolds number effects in steady, three-dimensional airway reopening. Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Engng 128, 473–478.Google ScholarPubMed
Heil, M. 2000 Finite Reynolds number effects in the propagation of an air finger into a liquid-filled flexible-walled channel. J. Fluid Mech. 424, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O. E., Horsburgh, M. K., Halpern, D. & Gaver III, D. P. 2002 The steady propagation of a bubble in a flexible-walled channel: asymptotic and computational models. Phys. Fluids 14, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, R. D. & Schroter, R. C. 1989 Is airway closure caused by a liquid film instability? Resp. Physiol. 75, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, H., Chew, Y. & Zhou, C. 1997 Pulmonary airway reopening: effects of non-Newtonian fluid viscosity. Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Engng 119, 298–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Macklem, P. T., Proctor, D. F. & Moss, J. C. 1970 The stability of peripheral airways. Resp. Physiol. 8, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naire, S. & Jensen, O. 2005 Epithelial cell deformation during surfactant-mediated airway reopening: a theoretical model. J. Appl. Physiol. 99, 458–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naureckas, E. T., Dawson, C. A., Gerber, B. S., Gaver III, D. P., Gerber, H. L., Lineran, J. M., Solway, J. & Samsel, R. W. 1994 Airway reopening pressure in isolated rat lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 76, 1372–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perun, M. L. & Gaver III, D. P. 1995a An experimental model investigation of the opening of a collapsed untethered pulmonary airway. Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Engng 117, 245–253.Google ScholarPubMed
Perun, M. L. & Gaver III, D. P. 1995b Interaction between airway lining fluid forces and parenchymal tethering during pulmonary airway reopening. J. Appl. Physiol. 79, 1717–1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatz, M. F., VanHook, S. J., McCormick, W., Swift, J. B. & Swinney, H. L. 1995 Onset of surface-tension-driven Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1938–1941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, A. H. 1977 Steady flow in collapsible tubes. Trans. ASME: J. Biomech. Engng 99, 126–147.Google Scholar
White, J. P. & Heil, M. 2005 Three-dimensional instabilities of liquid-lined elastic tubes: A thin-film fluid-structure interaction model. Phys. Fluids 17, 031506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar