Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:30:06.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pressure plateau of separation induced by shock impingement in a Mach 5 flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2023

Longsheng Xue
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China
Yun Jiao
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China
Chengpeng Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China
Keming Cheng
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, PR China
*
Email address for correspondence: wangcp@nuaa.edu.cn

Abstract

Separation induced by impinging shock is a fundamental feature in supersonic and hypersonic flows; however, it is difficult to predict the pressure plateau due to a limited theoretical understanding of the effect of impinging shock strength. In this study, the evolution of the separation configuration and pressure distribution with changes in impinging shock angle is examined, and a theoretical equation for predicting the pressure plateau based on minimum entropy production is proposed. For validation, an experimental device that can measure wall pressure in the separation region at high spatiotemporal resolution is developed, and schlieren visualization is employed to capture the flow structure. Accordingly, the fine characteristics of pressure distributions along the centreline of the separation region as well as the reattachment region induced by shock impingement at various angles ($8.5^\circ$ to $30.5^\circ$) are obtained in a flow of Mach number 5 and Reynolds number ${\approx }1.4\times 10^7\ {\rm m}^{-1}$. The experimental results agree well with the theoretical results; both indicate that the pressure distribution is strongly related to the impinging shock strength and that there is a critical flow deflection angle $\alpha ^\ast$ (${\approx }20.8^\circ$ for Mach 5). The pressure in the separation region grows nearly linearly with increasing impinging shock strength when the flow deflection angle of the impinging shock is less than $\alpha ^\ast$; the pressure stops growing and resides in a small range when the flow deflection angle is larger than $\alpha ^\ast$. Therefore, the impinging shock strength should be considered a main factor when predicting the pressure plateau.

Type
JFM Rapids
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babinsky, H. & Harvey, J.K. 2011 Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhardwaj, S., Vamsi, K.H.C. & Sriram, R. 2022 On the scaling of three-dimensional shock-induced separated flow due to protuberances. Phys. Fluids 34, 076115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J.T., Li, N., Xu, K.J., Bao, W. & Yu, D.R. 2017 Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 89, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D.R., Kuehn, D.M. & Larson, H.K. 1958 Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Tech. Rep. 1356.Google Scholar
Erdos, J. & Pallone, A. 1962 Shock-boundary layer interaction and flow separation. In Proceedings of the 1962 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, vol. 15, pp. 239–254. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eric, W.K.C., Wilson, Y.K.C., Timothy, J.M. & Ananthanarayanan, V. 2021 Hypersonic shock impingement on a heated flat plate at Mach 7 flight enthalpy. J. Fluid Mech. 908, R1.Google Scholar
Gai, S.L. & Khraibut, A. 2019 Hypersonic compression corner flow with large separated regions. J. Fluid Mech. 877, 471494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giepman, R.H.M., Schrijer, F.F.J. & van Oudheusden, B.W. 2018 A parametric study of laminar and transitional oblique shock wave reflections. J. Fluid Mech. 844, 187215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, I.J. & Bruce, P.J.K. 2018 Confinement effects on regular-irregular transition in shock-wave-boundary-layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 853, 171204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1996 Application of the principle of minimum entropy production to shock wave reflection. Part I. Steady flow. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 20272037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheis, J. & Hickel, S. 2015 On the transition between regular and irregular shock patterns of shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 776, 200234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandham, N.D., Schulein, E., Wagner, A., Willems, S. & Steelant, J. 2014 Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 752, 349382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmucker, R.H. 1973 Side loads and their reduction in liquid rocket engines. Tech. Rep. TUM-LRT TB-14, 24th International Astronautical Congress, Baku, USSR.Google Scholar
Sriram, R., Srinath, L., Devaraj, M.K.K. & Jagadeesh, G. 2016 On the length scales of hypersonic shock-induced large separation bubbles near leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 806, 304355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Y., Fan, X.Q. & Zhao, Y.L. 2014 Viscous effects of shock reflection hysteresis in steady supersonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 759, 134148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.P., Xue, L.S. & Cheng, K.M. 2018 Application of the minimum entropy production principle to shock reflection induced by separation. J. Fluid Mech. 857, 784805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.G., Zhao, Y.L., Zhao, Y.X. & Fan, X.Q. 2015 Prediction of massive separation of unstarted inlet via free-interaction theory. AIAA J. 53, 11081112.Google Scholar
Xie, W.Z., Yang, S.Z., Zeng, C., Liao, K., Ding, R.H., Zhang, L. & Guo, S.M. 2021 Improvement of the free-interaction theory for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. Phys. Fluids 33, 075104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, L.S., Cheng, C., Wang, C.P. & Cheng, K.M. 2021 a An integration method based on a novel combined flow for aerodynamic configuration of strutjet engine. Chinese J. Aeronaut. 34, 156167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, L.S., Schrijer, F.F.J., van Oudheusden, B.W., Wang, C.P., Shi, Z.W. & Cheng, K.M. 2020 Theoretical study on regular reflection of shock wave-boundary layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 899, A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, L.S., Wang, C.P. & Cheng, K.M. 2018 Dynamic characteristics of separation shock in an unstarted hypersonic inlet flow. AIAA J. 56, 24842490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, L.S., Wang, C.P. & Cheng, K.M. 2021 b A study on the RR-to-MR transition of shock wave reflections near the leading edge in hypersonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 919, A40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhukoski, E.E. 1967 Turbulent boundary-layer separation in front of a forward-facing step. AIAA J. 5, 17461753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar