Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:52:50.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-ergodicity of inviscid two-dimensional flow on a beta-plane and on the surface of a rotating sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Theodore G. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK

Abstract

It is shown that, for a sufficiently large value of β, two-dimensional flow on a doubly-periodic beta-plane cannot be ergodic (phase-space filling) on the phase-space surface of constant energy and enstrophy. A corresponding result holds for flow on the surface of a rotating sphere, for a sufficiently rapid rotation rate Ω. This implies that the higher-order, non-quadratic invariants are exerting a significant influence on the statistical evolution of the flow. The proof relies on the existence of a finite-amplitude Liapunov stability theorem for zonally symmetric basic states with a non-vanishing absolute-vorticity gradient. When the domain size is much larger than the size of a typical eddy, then a sufficient condition for non-ergodicity is that the wave steepness ε < 1, where ε = 2√2ZU in the planar case and $\epsilon = 2^{\frac{1}{4}} a^{\frac{5}{2}}Z^{\frac{7}{4}}/\Omega U^{\frac{5}{2}}$ in the spherical case, and where Z is the enstrophy, U the r.m.s. velocity, and a the radius of the sphere. This result may help to explain why numerical simulations of unforced beta-plane turbulence (in which ε decreases in time) seem to evolve into a non-ergodic regime at large scales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnol'd, V. I. 1966 On an a priori estimate in the theory of hydrodynamical stability. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Matematika 54, no. 5, 35. (English transl.: Am. Math. Soc. Transl., Series 2 79, 267–269 (1969).)Google Scholar
Babiano, A., Basdevant, C., Legras, B. & Sadourny, R. 1984 Dynamiques comparées du tourbillon et d'un scalaire passif en turbulence bi-dimensionnelle incompressible. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 299, Serie II, 601604.Google Scholar
Basdevant, C. & Sadourny, R. 1975 Ergodic properties of inviscid truncated models of two-dimensional incompressible flows. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 673688.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, A. F. & Haidvogel, D. B. 1983 Low-resolution numerical simulation of decaying two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 738748.Google Scholar
Boer, G. J. 1983 Homogeneous and isotropic turbulence on the sphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 154163.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F. 1982 Statistical features of the evolution of two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 143153.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F., Frisch, U. & Salmon, R. 1981 H-theorems in statistical fluid dynamics. J. Phys. A 14, 17011718.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G. & Orszag, S. A. 1973 Inviscid dynamics of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 16, 169171.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. 1975 Theory of two-dimensional anisotropic turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 22542271.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. & McWilliams, J. C. 1985 Comparison of direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional turbulence with two-point closure: the effects of intermittency. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 229242.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R., Orszag, S. A., Kraichnan, R. & Fox, D. G. 1974 Decay of two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 417444.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. 1984 Contrary roles of planetary wave propagation in atmospheric predictability. In Predictability of Fluid Motions, Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. (ed. G. Holloway & B. J. West), vol. 106, pp. 593599.
Holloway, G. 1986 Eddies, waves, circulation, and mixing: statistical geofluid mechanics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 91147.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. & Hendershott, M. C. 1977 Stochastic closure for nonlinear Rossby waves. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 747765.Google Scholar
Kells, L. C. & Orszag, S. A. 1978 Randomness of low-order models of two-dimensional inviscid dynamics. Phys. Fluids 21, 162168.Google Scholar
Killworth, P. D. & McIntyre, M. E. 1985 Do Rossby-wave critical layers absorb, reflect or over-reflect? J. Fluid Mech. 161, 449492.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1967 Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10, 14171423.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1975 Statistical dynamics of two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 155175.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. & Shepherd, T. G. 1987 An exact local conservation theorem for finite-amplitude disturbances to non-parallel shear flows, with remarks on Hamiltonian structure and on Arnol'd's stability theorems. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 527565.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. 1984 The emergence of isolated, coherent vortices in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 2143.Google Scholar
Peierls, R. 1979 Surprises in Theoretical Physics. Princeton University Press.
Prigogine, I. 1980 From Being to Becoming. W. H. Freeman.
Rhines, P. B. 1975 Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 417443.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1982 Geostrophic turbulence. In Topics in Ocean Physics (ed. A. R. Osborne & P. Malanotte-Rizzoli), vol. 80, pp. 3078. Societa Italiana di Fisica, Bologna: North-Holland.
Salmon, R., Holloway, G. & Hendershott, M. C. 1976 The equilibrium statistical mechanics of simple quasi-geostrophic models. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 691703.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. D. 1982 On the structure of the hydrodynamical equations for two-dimensional flows of an incompressible fluid: the role of integral invariance. In Mathematical Methods in Hydrodynamics and Integrability in Dynamical Systems, Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. (ed. M. Tabor & Y. M. Treve), vol. 88, pp. 301317.