Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:47:45.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A general method for finding extremal states of Hamiltonian dynamical systems, with applications to perfect fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Theodore G. Shepherd
Theodore G. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A7, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In addition to the Hamiltonian functional itself, non-canonical Hamiltonian dynamical systems generally possess integral invariants known as ‘Casimir functionals’. In the case of the Euler equations for a perfect fluid, the Casimir functionals correspond to the vortex topology, whose invariance derives from the particle-relabelling symmetry of the underlying Lagrangian equations of motion. In a recent paper, Vallis, Carnevale & Young (1989) have presented algorithms for finding steady states of the Euler equations that represent extrema of energy subject to given vortex topology, and are therefore stable. The purpose of this note is to point out a very general method for modifying any Hamiltonian dynamical system into an algorithm that is analogous to those of Vallis et al. in that it will systematically increase or decrease the energy of the system while preserving all of the Casimir invariants. By incorporating momentum into the extremization procedure, the algorithm is able to find steadily-translating as well as steady stable states. The method is applied to a variety of perfect-fluid systems, including Euler flow as well as compressible and incompressible stratified flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 213 , April 1990 , pp. 573 - 587
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnol'D, V. I. 1965 Conditions for nonlinear stability of stationary plane curvilinear flows of an ideal fluid. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 162, 975–978 (English trans. Sov. Maths 6, 773–777 (1965)).Google Scholar
Arnol'D, V. I. 1966 On an a priori estimate in the theory of hydrodynamical stability. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Matematika 54 (5), 3–5 (English trans. Am. Math. Soc. Trans., Series 2 79, 267–269 (1969)).Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1984 Impulse, flow force and variational principles. IMA J. Appl. Maths 32, 3–68.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1986 On the Boussinesq model for two-dimensional wave motions in heterogeneous fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 445–474.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F. & Frederiksen, J. S. 1987 Nonlinear stability and statistical mechanics of flow over topography. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 157–181.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F. & Shepherd, T. G. 1990 On the interpretation of Andrews’ theorem. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 51, 1–17.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F. & Vallis, G. K. 1990 Pseudo-advective relaxation to stable states of inviscid two-dimensional fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 549–571.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D. 1986 Hamiltonian formulation of the baroclinic quasigeostrophic fluid equations. Phys. Fluids 29, 7–8.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E., Ratiu, T. & Weinstein, A. 1985 Nonlinear stability of fluid and plasma equilibria. Phys. Rep. 123, 1–116.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Lord 1887 On the stability of steady and of periodic fluid motion. Phil. Mag. 23, 459–464.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, R. G. 1982 Singular Poisson tensors. In Mathematical Methods in Hydrodynamics and Integrability in Dynamical Systems (ed. M. Tabor & Y. M. Treve), Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. vol. 88, pp. 47–66
Mcintyre, M. E. & Shepherd, T. G. 1987 An exact local conservation theorem for finite-amplitude disturbances to non-parallel shear flows, with remarks on Hamiltonian structure and on Arnol'd's stability theorems. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 527–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1969 The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117–129.Google Scholar
Morrison, P. J. 1982 Poisson brackets for fluids and plasmas. In Mathematical Methods in Hydrodynamics and Integrability in Dynamical Systems (ed. M. Tabor & Y. M. Treve), Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc. vol. 88, pp. 13–46
Olver, P. J. 1986 Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations. Springer.
Salmon, R. 1988a Hamiltonian fluid mechanics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225–256.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1988b Semigeostrophic theory as a Dirac-bracket projection. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 345–358.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1987 Non-ergodicity of inviscid two-dimensional flow on a beta-plane and on the surface of a rotating sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 289–302.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. 1988 Rigorous bounds on the nonlinear saturation of instabilities to parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 291–322.Google Scholar
Vallis, G. K., Carnevale, G. F. & Young, W. R. 1989 Extremal energy properties and construction of stable solutions of the Euler equations. J. Fluid Mech. 207, 133–152.Google Scholar