Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:26:21.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barge motions in random seas – a comparison of theory and experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

D. T. Brown
Affiliation:
London Centre for Marine Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College London
R. Eatock Taylor
Affiliation:
London Centre for Marine Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College London
M. H. Patel
Affiliation:
London Centre for Marine Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering. University College London

Abstract

This paper describes a comparison of experimental data and theoretical results for the motions in waves of large flat-bottomed barges having zero forward speed. The experimental data are derived from model tests at two scales (1:36 and 1:108). These consist of measurements of motions in surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch and yaw to long-crested seas approaching the barge models at two orientation angles (head and beam seas). The experimental data are compared with results computed from linearized potential-flow theory, which accounts for the diffraction and radiation of gravity waves around the barge. The boundary-integral scheme employed to solve this potential-flow problem is briefly reviewed.

The experimental data at two scales and the theoretical results show that potential-flow theory is in reasonable agreement with experimental data for all motions except roll near resonance. These roll-motion discrepancies, due to vortex shedding from bilge-keel edges, are discussed. Some of the observable effects of scale in the model tests are highlighted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. 1971 Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley-Interscience.
Brown, D. T. & Patel, M. H. 1981 An investigation of vortex shedding below the keel of a floating offshore vessel in waves. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Unsteady Turbulent Shear Flows (ed. R. Michel, J. Cousteix & R. Houdeville), p. 329. Springer.
Eatock Taylor, R. 1982 Analysis of hydrodynamic loads by boundary element methods. In Developments in Boundary Element Methods −2 (ed. P. K. Banerjee & R. P. Shaw), p. 211. Applied Science Publishers.
Eatock Taylor, R. & Waite, J. B. 1978 The dynamics of offshore structures evaluated by boundary integral techniques Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng 13, 73.Google Scholar
Eatock Taylor, R. & Zietsman, J. 1981 Implementation of coupled formulations for hydro-dynamic analysis in three dimensions. In Numerical Methods for Coupled Problems (ed. E. Hinton, P. Bettess & R. W. Lewis), p. 281. Pineridge.
John, F. 1950 On the motion of floating bodies. II Communs Pure Appl. Maths 3, 45.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1978 Numerical methods in water wave diffraction and radiation Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10, 393.Google Scholar
Newman, J. N. 1977 Marine Hydrodynamics. M.I.T. Press.
Patel, M. H. & Brown, D. T. 1981 The calculation of vorticity effects on the motion response of a flat-bottomed barge to waves. In Proc. Intl Symp. on Hydrodynamics in Ocean Engng, Norwegian Inst. of Tech., Trondheim, 24–28 August, p. 667.
Shaw, R. P. 1979 Boundary integral equation methods applied to wave problems. In Developments in Boundary Element Methods −1 (ed. P. K. Banerjee & R. Butterfield), p. 121. Applied Science Publishers.
Ursell, F. 1981 Irregular frequencies and the motion of floating bodies J. Fluid Mech. 105, 143.Google Scholar