Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. The Journal of Economic History
  4. Volume 44
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:
Topic: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 44 - September 1984

Contents

Page 3 of 12

Notes and Discussion

Notes and discussion

Editors' Notes

  • Editors' Notes

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 March 2009, pp. 1100-1104
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association

Notes and discussion

Review Article

Reviews of Books

Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association

  • Macroeconomic Instability and the “Natural” Processes in early Neoclassical Economics

  • Philip Mirowski
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 March 2009, pp. 345-354

  • It may seem odd to disinter an economic theory—in this instance, William Stanley Jevons's claim that sunspots caused macroeconomic fluctuations—which no one now believes or much cares about. In fact, my purpose is not to scoff at a dead theory, but to use it as a pretext to discuss the following issues: economic historians often have suggested a dichotomy between a premodem and industrial macroeconomy, with the premodern economy largely at the mercy of weather and other natural phenomena; the dichotomy is rooted in early neoclassical economic theory (here restricting ourselves to Jevons); there is little historical evidence that premodern macro fluctuations were caused by natural disturbances, such as the weather (here restricting ourselves to the case of England); and the above three theses have some interesting implications for the way economic policy is conceived, both then and now.

Reviews of Books

Review Article

Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association

Editors' Notes

  • Editors' Notes

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 March 2009, pp. 185-189
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association

  • Keynes and Protection

  • Barry Eichengreen
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 March 2009, pp. 363-373

  • The paper traces the development of Keynes's views of free trade and protection and their relationship to British economic policy from 1922 to 1946.

    “Is there anything that a tariff could do which an earthquake could not do better?”

Reviews of Books

Editor's Notes

  • Editor's Notes

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 March 2009, pp. 844-847
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews of Books

Papers Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association

Page 3 of 12