Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:04:32.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Description of a method for inducing fetal growth restriction in the spiny mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

H. Dickinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
S. Ellery
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
M. Davies-Tuck
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
M. Tolcos
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
I. Nitsos
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
D. W. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
S. L. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: H. Dickinson, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, The Ritchie Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia. (Email Hayley.dickinson@hudson.org.au)

Abstract

Intrauterine or fetal growth restriction (IUGR) is a major complication of pregnancy and leads to significant perinatal morbidities and mortality. Typically, induction of IUGR in animals involves the complete occlusion or ablation of vessels to the uterus or placenta, acutely impairing blood flow and fetal growth, usually with high fetal loss. We aimed to produce a model of reduced fetal growth in the spiny mouse with minimal fetal loss. At 27 days gestational age (term is 38–39 days), a piece of silastic tubing was placed around the left uterine artery to prevent the further increase of uterine blood flow with advancing gestation to induce IUGR (occluded). Controls were generated from sham surgeries without placement of the tubing. Dams were humanely euthanized at 37 days gestational age and all fetuses and placentas were weighed and collected. Of the 17 dams that underwent surgery, 15 carried their pregnancies to 37 days gestational age and 95% of fetuses survived to this time. The difference in fetal body weight between occluded and control was ~21% for fetuses in the left uterus side: there were no differences for fetuses in the right uterus side. Offspring from the occluded group had significantly lower brain, liver, lung, kidney and carcass weights compared with shams. Preventing the gestation-related increase of uterine blood flow induced significant growth restriction in the fetal spiny mouse, with minimal fetal loss. This technique could be readily adapted for other small animal.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Miller, SL, Huppi, PS, Mallard, C. The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome. J Physiol. 2016; 594, 807823.Google Scholar
2. Gardosi, J, Madurasinghe, V, Williams, M, Malik, A, Francis, A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. Br Med J. 2013; 346, f108.Google Scholar
3. Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Chou, D, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013; 10, 1.Google Scholar
4. Garite, TJ, Clark, R, Thorp, JA. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191, 481487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Nardozza, LMM, Júnior, EA, Barbosa, MM, et al. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge to the general Obs/Gyn. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McMillen, IC, Adams, MB, Ross, JT, et al. Fetal growth restriction: adaptations and consequences. Reproduction. 2001; 122, 195204.Google Scholar
7. Resnik, R. Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99, 490496.Google Scholar
8. Hinchliffe, S, Lynch, M, Sargent, P, Howard, C, Velzen, Dv. The effect of intrauterine growth retardation on the development of renal nephrons. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992; 99, 296301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Morrison, JL, Botting, KJ, Soo, PS, et al. Antenatal steroids and the IUGR fetus: are exposure and physiological effects on the lung and cardiovascular system the same as in normally grown fetuses? J Pregnancy. 2012; 2012, 839656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Swanson, A, David, A. Animal models of fetal growth restriction: considerations for translational medicine. Placenta. 2015; 36, 623630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Jansson, T, Persson, E. Placental transfer of glucose and amino acids in intrauterine growth retardation: studies with substrate analogs in the awake guinea pig. Pediatr Res. 1990; 28, 203208.Google Scholar
12. Ergaz, Z, Avgil, M, Ornoy, A. Intrauterine growth restriction – etiology and consequences: what do we know about the human situation and experimental animal models? Reprod Toxicol. 2005; 20, 301322.Google Scholar
13. Herrera, EA, Alegria, R, Farias, M, et al. Assessment of in vivo fetal growth and placental vascular function in a novel intrauterine growth restriction model of progressive uterine artery occlusion in guinea pigs. J Physiol. 2016; 594, 15531561.Google Scholar
14. Bellofiore, N, Ellery, SJ, Mamrot, J, et al. First evidence of a menstruating rodent: the spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216, 40.e140.e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Brunjes, P. A comparative study of prenatal development in the olfactory bulb, neocortex and hippocampal region of the precocial mouse (Acomys cahirinus) and rat. Dev Brain Res. 1989; 49, 725.Google Scholar
16. O’Connell, B, Moritz, K, Walker, D, Dickinson, H. Sexually dimorphic placental development throughout gestation in the spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) . Placenta. 2013; 34, 119126.Google Scholar
17. Quinn, TA, Ratnayake, U, Dickinson, H, et al. Ontogeny of the adrenal gland in the spiny mouse, with particular reference to production of the steroids cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone. Endocrinology. 2013; 154, 11901201.Google Scholar
18. Fleiss, B, Parkington, HC, Coleman, HA, et al. Effect of maternal administration of allopregnanolone before birth asphyxia on neonatal hippocampal function in the spiny mouse. Brain Res. 2012; 1433, 919.Google Scholar
19. Dickinson, H, Walker, D, Cullen-McEwen, L, Wintour, E, Moritz, K. The spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) completes nephrogenesis before birth. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005; 289, F273F279.Google Scholar
20. Lamers, W, Mooren, P, De Graaf, A, Charles, R. Perinatal development of the liver in rat and spiny mouse. Its relation to altricial and precocial timing of birth. Eur J Biochem. 1985; 146, 475480.Google Scholar
21. Oosterhuis, W, Mooren, P, Charles, R, Lamers, W. Perinatal development of the lung in rat and spiny mouse: its relation to altricial and precocial timing of birth. Biol Neonate. 1984; 45, 236243.Google Scholar
22. Basilious, A, Yager, J, Fehlings, MG. Neurological outcomes of animal models of uterine artery ligation and relevance to human intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; 57, 420430.Google Scholar
23. Dickinson, H, Moritz, KM, Kett, MM. A comparative study of renal function in male and female spiny mice‚ sex specific responses to a high salt challenge. Biol Sex Differ. 2013; 4, 21.Google Scholar
24. Ellery, SJ, LaRosa, DA, Cullen-McEwen, LA, et al. Renal dysfunction in early adulthood following birth asphyxia in male spiny mice, and its amelioration by maternal creatine supplementation during pregnancy. Pediatr Res. 2017; 81, 646653.Google Scholar
25. LaRosa, DA, Ellery, SJ, Snow, RJ, Walker, DW, Dickinson, H. Maternal creatine supplementation during pregnancy prevents acute and long-term deficits in skeletal muscle after birth asphyxia: a study of structure and function of hind limb muscle in the spiny mouse. Pediatr Res. 2016; 80, 852860.Google Scholar
26. LaRosa, DA, Ellery, SJ, Parkington, HC, et al. Maternal creatine supplementation during pregnancy prevents long-term changes in diaphragm muscle structure and function after birth asphyxia. PLoS One. 2016; 11, e0149840.Google Scholar