Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:04:33.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of aseptically packed ultra-heat-treated milk: Electron microscopic examination of changes occurring during storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. T. Andrews ,
B. E. Brooker  and
D. G. Hobbs
A. T. Andrews
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
B. E. Brooker
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
D. G. Hobbs
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Changes in the appearance of casein micelles and fat globules in ultra-heat-treated (UHT) milk were comparatively slight within a 14-month storage period although closer inspection often revealed the beginnings of some of the changes observed after even longer storage. Within this period the milks remained liquid and no evidence for any proteolytic breakdown was seen on electrophoretio examination. After 34 months the milks had all gelled and there was evidence of a small amount of proteolytic breakdown. Electron microscopic changes were striking and depended on storage temperature. At 4 °C the casein micelles in the gel phase had become very ‘spiky’ and long tendrils often bridged micelles, forming extensive networks. At room temperature and at 30 °C this tendril formation was less marked and the average micelle size was considerably greater than in freshly processed milk. There was also clear evidence for the coalescence of micelles. After storage at 37 °C the micelles were much larger than in the other samples, often exceeding 0·4 mμ in diam.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 283 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M., Brooker, B. E., Cawston, T. E. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. T. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. T. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1971). Journal of Dairy Research 38, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. T. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. & Michalak, W. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, T. R. (1965). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 18, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. (1969). Dairy Science Abstracts 31, 287.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. J., Thompson, M. P. & Nutting, G. C. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. J., Thompson, M. P. & Melnychyn, P. (1971). Journal of Dairy Science 54, 1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, W. J., Hidalgo, J. E. & Mikolajcik, E. M. (1970). 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney 1 E, 192.Google Scholar
Heintzberger, H., Koops, J. & Westerbeek, D. (1971). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 26, 31.Google Scholar
Henstra, S. & Schmidt, D. G. (1970). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 24, 45.Google Scholar
Hostettler, H. (1972). Annual Bulletin, International Dairy Federation No. 5, p. 6.Google Scholar
Hostettler, H., Stein, J. & Imhof, K. (1968). Mitteilungen aus dem Oebiete der Lebensmitteluntersuchung und Hygiene 59, 60.Google Scholar
Kalab, M. & Harkwalkar, V. R. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimber, A. M., Brooker, B. E., Hobbs, D. G. & Prentice, J. H. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindqvist, B. (1970). 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney 1 E, 191.Google Scholar
Muller, L. L. & Jacks, T. J. (1975). Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 23, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, L., Herreid, E. O. & Whitney, R. Mc. (1958). Journal of Dairy Science 41, 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakai, S., Wilson, H. K. & Herreid, E. O. (1964). Journal of Dairy Science 47, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. & Calvin, J. R. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruegg, M., Luscher, M. & Blanc, B. (1974). Journal of Dairy Science 57, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samel, R., Weaver, R. W. V. & Gammack, D. B. (1971). Journal of Dairy Research 38, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, E. G. & Holm, S. (1966). 17th International Dairy Congress, Munich B, 57.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. (1968). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 22, 40.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. (1969). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 23, 128.Google Scholar
Swartling, P. (1967). Technical Publications, Australian Society of Dairy Technology 19, 18.Google Scholar
Zadow, J. G. & Chituta, F. (1975). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 30, 104.Google Scholar