Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:59:39.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lactulose content, colour and the organoleptic assessment of ultra heat treated and sterilized milks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Geoffrey R. Andrews
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK‡
Steven V. Morant
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK‡

Summary

24 ultra heat treated (UHT) and 17 in-bottle sterilized milks prepared in commercial plants and of a similar age were presented to taste panels for assessment of flavour and colour. The colour was also analysed instrumentally and the lactulose content of the milks measured by an enzymic method. Flavour defects, other than the cooked flavour, were scored very low. The lactulose content of the milks was negatively correlated with the acceptability of the milks and positively correlated with the cooked flavour. Correlations were also found between the visual and instrumental assessments of milk colour and between some of the instrumental colour parameters and the lactulose content of the milks. UHT and in-container sterilized milks could not always be distinguished on the basis of their organoleptic qualities. The best distinction was observed in the scores for cooked smell and acceptability of taste. The usefulness of the lactulose content and/or the colour of the milks in discriminating between UHT and in-bottle sterilized milks was calculated. Using all the data, sterilized milk could be correctly identified in 96·7% of decisions. The lactulose content of a milk was considered to give a good indication of the organoleptic quality of the milk.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, G. R. 1984 Distinguishing pasteurized, UHT and sterilized milks by their lactulose content. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 37 9295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1985 Determining the energy of activation for the formation of lactulose in heated milks. Journal of Dairy Research 52 275280Google Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1986 a Ph.D. thesis, University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1986 b Effect of storage, light and homogenization on the colour of ultra heat treated and sterilized milk. Journal of Dairy Research 53 615624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. 1986 c Review article. Formation and occurrence of lactulose in heated milk. Journal of Dairy Research 53 665680Google Scholar
Blankenagel, G. & Humbert, E. S. 1963 Sulfhydryl groups and cooked flavor in ultra-high-temperature processed skimmilk. Journal of Dairy Science 46 614Google Scholar
Bosset, J. O. & Blanc, B. 1978 Determination of the colour of milk and milk products using a tristimulus reflectance photometer (Hunter system). 20th International Dairy Congress, Paris E 427428Google Scholar
Brunner, J. R. 1974 Physical equilibria in milk: the lipid phase. In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry 2nd edn pp. 474602 (Eds Webb, B. H., Johnson, A. H. and Alford, J. A.) Westport, CT: Avi Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Burton, H. 1954 Colour changes in heated and unheated milk. 1. The browning of milk on heating. Journal of Dairy Research 21 194203Google Scholar
Burton, H. 1956 The effect of heat treatment on the colour of milk. 2. Practical applications of colour measurement in the control of heat treatment. Dairy Industries 21 134137Google Scholar
Burton, H. 1959 Some observations on the performance of ultra-high-temperature milk-sterilizing plants. 15th International Dairy Congress, London 4 20452051Google Scholar
Burton, H. 1984 Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science: The bacteriological, chemical, biochemical and physical changes that occur in milk at temperatures of 100–150°C. Journal of Dairy Research 51 341363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, R. & Kessler, H. G. 1984 [Assessment of sensory changes during storage of UHT milk.] Deutsche Molkerei-Zeitung 105 14441454Google Scholar
Horak, F. P. & Kessler, H. G. 1981 [Colour measurement as an indicator of heat treatment of foods, as exemplified by milk products.] Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Technologie und -V erfahrenstechnik 32 180184Google Scholar
Hostettler, H. 1972 Appearance, flavour and texture aspects. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin Document no. 68 634 (IDF Monograph on UHT Milk)Google Scholar
Hunter, R. S. 1942 Photoelectric tristimulus colorimetry with three filters. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (NBS Circular 429)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1984 Definitions of heat treatment as applied to milk products. Brussels: IDF (IDF D-Doc 120)Google Scholar
Keenan, T. W., Dylewski, D. P., Woodford, T. A. & Ford, R. H. 1983 Origin of milk fat globules and the nature of the milk fat globule membrane. In Developments in Dairy Chemistry-2. Lipids pp. 83118 (Ed. Fox, P. F.) London: Applied Science PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loo, L. G. W. van der 1983 [Differences between different types of milk preserved by heating.] Zuivelzicht 75 116–118; 138141Google Scholar
McLaren, K. & Rigg, B. 1976 The SDC recommended colour difference formula – change to CIELAB. Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists 92 337338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, A. V., Dash, M. C. & Kitchen, B. J. 1984 a Isolation and composition of milk fat globule membrane material. I. From pasteurized milks and creams. Journal of Dairy Research 51 279287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, A. V., Dash, M. C. & Kitchen, B. J. 1984 b Isolation and composition of milk fat globule membrane material. II. From homogenized and ultra heat treated milks. Journal of Dairy Research 51 289297Google Scholar
Mogensen, G. & Poulsen, P. R. 1980 Quality of UHT milk, stored at refrigerated and ambient temperatures as compared to HTST pasteurized milk. Milchwissenschaft 35 552556Google Scholar
Mottar, J. & Naudts, M. 1979 [Quality of UHT milk compared with that of pasteurized and in-bottle sterilized milks.] Lait 59 476488Google Scholar
Mulder, H. & Walstra, P. 1974 The Milk Fat Clobule. Farnham Royal, Bucks: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (Commonwealth Bureau of Dairy Science and Technology, Technical Communication no. 4)Google Scholar
Naudts, M. & Mottar, J. 1981 Appendix D to Doc.D-Doc. 77 Brussels: IDFGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, A. C. & O'Connor, F. 1969 International seminar on UHT processing. Dairy Industries 34 494499Google Scholar
Pavey, J. A., Hillier, R. M. & Burton, H. 1982 The turbidity test applied to UHT milk. International Dairy Congress, Moscow 1 (1) 260261Google Scholar
Pien, J. 1972 Method for distinguishing between UHT milks and conventional sterilized milks. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin Document no. 68 5455 (IDF Monograph on UHT Milk)Google Scholar
Thomas, E. L., Burton, H., Ford, J. E. & Perkin, A. G. 1975 The effect of oxygen content on flavour and chemical changes during aseptic storage of whole milk after ultra-high-temperature processing. Journal of Dairy Research 42 285295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walstra, P. & Jenness, R. 1984 Dairy Chemistry and Physics. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Zadow, J. G. 1980 UHT milk – standards and quality assurance. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 35 140144Google Scholar
Zadow, J. G. & Birtwistle, R. 1973 The effect of dissolved 02 on the changes occurring in the flavour of ultra-high-temperature milk during storage. Journal of Dairy Research 40 169177CrossRefGoogle Scholar