Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:13:56.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of liner design on mouthpiece chamber vacuum during milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Janthea A. Newman ,
Robert J. Grindal  and
M. Clare Butler
Janthea A. Newman
Affiliation:
MAFF, ADAS, Quantock House, Paul Street, Taunton TA1 3NX, UK
Robert J. Grindal
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN, UK
M. Clare Butler
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Engineering Research, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshire MK45 4HS, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three types of liner (wide bore tapered, wide bore and narrow bore) were compared in a change-over design experiment comprising three 3-d periods and using six lactating Holstein Friesian cows with a wide range in milk flow rate and teat dimensions. Vacuum levels measured within the liner showed a characteristic pattern of three distinct phases: 1, a mouthpiece chamber (MPC) vacuum that fluctuated with vacuum beneath the teat; 2, a stable MPC vacuum that coincided with the period of peak milk flow and 3, a MPC vacuum that fluctuated with pressure changes in the pulsation chamber and coincided with the period of no or reduced flow. Of the three liners examined, the Gascoigne 1030A (wide bore tapered) induced the highest MPC vacuum (29·4 ± 2·23 kPa, mean ± s.e.m), significantly higher (P < 0·01) than the Alfa-Laval 960000–01 wide bore (23·5 ± 2·32), regardless of teat size and milk flow rate. The Alfa-Laval 7275737–01 (narrow bore) gave a significantly lower value (16·5 ± 1·96) than either of the others (P < 0·001). It was not possible to link absolutely raised MPC vacuum to cow discomfort and teat trauma but circumstantial evidence encourages this view. Narrow teats in combination with slow flow rate appeared to exacerbate MPC vacuum and, because milking time for such animals was protracted, teats were exposed for longer periods.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 21 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler, M. C., Allen, C. J. & Hillerton, J. E. 1990 Methods of measuring and calculating milking performance of cows. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 46 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. 1987 Prospectus in machine milking. Proceedings of International Mastitis Symposium pp. 100–119Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
Mein, G. A. 1972 Mechanics of the teat and teatcup liner during milking. PhD Thesis, University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, J. F. 1969 The effect of vacuum fluctuation on udder disease. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Milking 1968 pp. 71–82 (Ed. Hall, H. S.). Shinfield: National Institute for Research in DairyingGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J. 1981 Machine milking and mastitis. Irish Veterinary Journal 35 93–99Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. & O'Callaghan, E. 1983 Liner design factors affecting milking characteristics. In Summary of Milking Research at Moorepark up to 1983 pp. 30–32Moorepark, Fermoy: An Foras TalúntaisGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J., O'Callaghan, E., Meaney, W. J. & Crowley, C. 1975 Liner slips, impacts and mastitis. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 14 372Google Scholar
O'Shea, J., O'Callaghan, E. & Walsh, J. P. 1986 Machine milking research. In Moorepark 25th Anniversary Publication II: Animal Health and Machine Milking pp. 115–214 (Ed. O'Shea, J.). Moorepark, Fermoy: An Foras TalúntaisGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. S. M. 1966 New Ideas on Teat Cup Design. Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre Publication No. 205Google Scholar