Skip to main content Accessibility help

How does the milk removal method affect teat tissue and teat recovery in dairy ewes?

  • Manuel Alejandro (a1), Amparo Roca (a1), Gema Romero (a1) and Jose Ramon Díaz (a1)


The aim of this work was to study how machine milking (MM) carried out in suitable conditions affects teat wall thickness and teat canal length and their return after milking to pre-milking conditions, in comparison with other milk extraction methods considered biological referents: lamb suckling (LS), milk removal by catheter (RC) and hand milking (HM). Three Latin square experiments were designed, using 11 ewes in the first experiment (LS), 13 in the second (RC) and 12 in the third (HM). Each of the Latin squares was divided into two periods: in the first, the left gland of each animal was machine milked and the corresponding treatment (LS, RC and HM) was applied to the right gland. Subsequently, in the second period the extraction methods were interchanged. During the experimental period, 4 sampling days were carried out (2 in each experimental period), where ultrasound scans were taken before (B) and immediately after milking (A) and at 1 (1 h), 2 (2 h), 3 (3 h), 4 (4 h), 6 (6 h), 8 (8 h) and 10 (10 h) hours after milking finished. Teat wall thickness (TWT), teat wall area (TWA), teat end area (TEWA) and teat canal length (TCL) were measured in all the ultrasound images. MM increased TWT after milking compared with RC. TWT, TWA, TEWA and TCL were lower (P<0·05) in HM than in MM. No significant differences (P>0·05) were found between LS and MM for any variable. The extraction method affected the recovery time of the variables, with total teat recovery at 6 h after RC and 4 h after HM. In the case of LS, the TEWA and TCL values were recovered sooner, as of 3 h. Teat recovery time after MM was similar to the extraction method with which it was compared in each experiment. Thus, considering the similar increase in wall thickness and their recovery time compared with the reference methods, it was concluded that machine milking, carried out in optimum conditions and respecting the time interval between milkings usually applied on sheep farms (8–12 h), would not affect teat integrity. Moreover, given the variability observed in teat thickness recovery time between the different experiments, further research should be carried out to study which factors intrinsic and extrinsic to the animal may affect the teat wall thickness and recovery time after machine milking.


Corresponding author

*For correspondence; e-mail:


Hide All
Alejandro, M, Roca, A, Romero, G & Díaz, JR 2014a Effects of milk removal on teat tissue and recovery in Murciano-Grandina goats. Journal of Dairy Science (in press)
Alejandro, M, Rodríguez, M, Peris, C & Díaz, JR 2014b Study of ultrasound scanning as method to estimate changes in teat thickness due to machine milking in Manchega ewes. Small Ruminant Research 119 138145
Castillo, V, Such, X, Caja, G, Casals, R, Albanell, E & Salama, AA 2008 Effect of milking interval on milk secretion and mammary tight junction permeability in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 91 26102619
Fahr, R, Schulz, J & Rosner, F 2001 Melkbedingte Veränderungen an der Zitzenspitze der Ziege [Milking associated changes of the teat end in goats]. Tierarztliche Praxis 29 G151G156
Gleeson, DE, O'callaghan, EJ & Rath, MV 2002 Effect of milking on bovine teat tissue as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal 55 628632
Hamann, J & Burvenich, C 1994 Physiological status of the bovine teat. En: Teat Tissue reactions to machine milking and new infection risk. International Dairy Federation 297 311
Hamann, J & Mein, GA 1988 Responses of bovine teat to machine milking. Measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex. Journal of Dairy Research 55 331338
Hamann, J & Mein, GA 1990 Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat. Journal of Dairy Research 57 495505
Hamann, J & Osteras, O 1994 II Special aspects. In Teat Tissue reactions to machine milking and new infection risk. International Dairy Federation 297 3541
Knizkova, I, Kunc, P, Broucek, J & Kisac, P 2005 The effect of calf suckling and machine milking on bovine teats. In Physiological and Technical Aspects of Machine Milking Proceedings of the International Conference held in Nitra, Slovak Republic, 26–28 April, pp. 137146 (Eds Tancin, V, Mihina, S & Uhrincat, M). Villa del Ragno, Via Nomentana 134, 00162 Rome, Italy: ICAR
Lefcourt, AM 1982 Rhythmic contractions of the teat sphincter in bovines: an expulsion mechanism. The American Journal of Physiology 242 R181R184
McDonald, JS & Witzel, DA 1966 Differential pressures across the bovine teat canal during three methods of milk removal. Journal of Dairy Science 49 176178
Neijenhuis, F, Klungel, GH & Hogeveen, H 2001 Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonography scanning. Journal of Dairy Science 84 25992606
Rasmussen, MD & Mayntz, M 1998 Pressuer in the teat cistern and the mouth of the calf during suckling. Journal of Dairy Research 65 685692
Ślósarz, P, Wójtowski, J, Bielińska, S, Frąckowiak, A, Ludwiczak, A, Krzyżewski, J, Bagnicka, E & Strzałkowska, N 2010 Machine induced changes of caprine teats diagnosed by ultrasonography. African Journal of Biotechnology 9 86988703
Svennersten, K, Claesson, C & Nelson, L 1990 Effect of local stimulation of one quarter on milk production and milk components. Journal of Dairy Science 73 970974
van der Tol, PPJ, Schrader, W & Aernouts, B 2010 Pressure distribution at the teat-liner and teat-calf interfaces. Journal of Dairy Science 93 4552
Wójtowski, J, Ślósarz, P, Bielińska, S, Nowicki, S, Gut, A & Danków, R 2006 Ultrasound image of morphological changes of teat end in sheep caused by machine milking. Archiv Tierzucht Dummerstorf 49 (Special Issue) 231237
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Dairy Research
  • ISSN: 0022-0299
  • EISSN: 1469-7629
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-dairy-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed